rkt.india Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 Mumbai Indians and KKR in their last match did not play a single U23 player in their XI. Wasn't it compulsory for the teams to play at least one U23 player in their match XI? How would it help these U23 players if they don't even play them in matches? Can anyone shed some light on this rule?
shinchan Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 i don't think there is rule on number of under 23 players in playing XI. there is rule about number of under 23 players in squad .
bulbul Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 common RKT those rules started in the begining ..may be for only 3 years who knows the same 21/22 year old kids now grown up and cross the age limit what you want drop them.. if there is no good replacements what teams will do
rkt.india Posted April 11, 2012 Author Posted April 11, 2012 common RKT those rules started in the begining ..may be for only 3 years who knows the same 21/22 year old kids now grown up and cross the age limit what you want drop them.. if there is no good replacements what teams will do Look at this Suryakumar Yadav, played one game, came in pressure situation, didnt do well, others did not do well too, but he was the one dropped for Suman who is not great either. Then ban U23 players from T20 and IPL so that they can concentrate building their game fro FC rather than modelling themselves for useless T20s
bulbul Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 Look at this Suryakumar Yadav, played one game, came in pressure situation, didnt do well, others did not do well too, but he was the one dropped for Suman who is not great either. Then ban U23 players from T20 and IPL so that they can concentrate building their game fro FC rather than modelling themselves for useless T20s RKT bhayya plz come out of this nationalistic thinking to reality.. What do you prefer if you are in place of a U23 player ? T20 or chance in Indian team which may come or may not?
rkt.india Posted April 11, 2012 Author Posted April 11, 2012 RKT bhayya plz come out of this nationalistic thinking to reality.. What do you prefer if you are in place of a U23 player ? T20 or chance in Indian team which may come or may not? They can certainly get chance in T20 once they pass 23.
bulbul Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 They can certainly get chance in T20 once they pass 23. there us No gurantee with anything.....cricket become commercial now.. new players will emerge every year what if 7/4 rule changed to 6/5...i dont thinl franchise will simply pay Foreign players in bench for too long What if U23 players want to play in IPL than FC?
rkt.india Posted April 11, 2012 Author Posted April 11, 2012 there us No gurantee with anything.....cricket become commercial now.. new players will emerge every year what if 7/4 rule changed to 6/5...i dont thinl franchise will simply pay Foreign players in bench for too long What if U23 players want to play in IPL than FC? They will have to go with with the rules.
bulbul Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 They will have to go with with the rules. means you think 7/4 will stay forever.. Also you didnt answered my question about what if U23 player whom you want take out of IPL prefer it over FC ??
rkt.india Posted April 11, 2012 Author Posted April 11, 2012 means you think 7/4 will stay forever.. Also you didnt answered my question about what if U23 player whom you want take out of IPL prefer it over FC ?? Because it is not players' decision. It is BCCI to decide who they want to play. These players earn quite even in FC cricket. U23 is the foundation for he national team for Test cricket and dont forget if a player does not make it to the Indian team, he does not even get the money. Uncapped players are not given huge money that Indian capped players get so it is all more important for them to play for India berth rather than IPL and because even IPL performances does not count much for team India selection as even our T20 team is not selected based on IPL performances apart from exceptions like Rahul Sharma.
bulbul Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 Because it is not players' decision. It is BCCI to decide who they want to play. These players earn quite even in FC cricket. U23 is the foundation for he national team for Test cricket and dont forget if a player does not make it to the Indian team' date=' he does not even get the money. Uncapped players are not given huge money that Indian capped players get so it is all more important for them to play for India berth rather than IPL and because even IPL performances does not count much for team India selection as even our T20 team is not selected based on IPL performances apart from exceptions like Rahul Sharma.[/quote'] 1.uncapped player gets a minimum of $10,000 and not all can dream of getting Indian cap with all the politics in Indian cricket. 2.Not all the players have enough talent to reach Team India but they can some how survive in T20 how many uncapped players came anywhere near to Indian team in last 5 years..i am talking about comparing overall ratio..Number of players played/selected for IPL and the few who came near to selection and played for A teams
rkt.india Posted April 11, 2012 Author Posted April 11, 2012 1.uncapped player gets a minimum of $10,000 and not all can dream of getting Indian cap with all the politics in Indian cricket. 2.Not all the players have enough talent to reach Team India but they can some how survive in T20 how many uncapped players came anywhere near to Indian team in last 5 years..i am talking about comparing overall ratio..Number of players played/selected for IPL and the few who came near to selection and played for A teams Bhai I am not talking about life ban on them, just U23. They will still have enough time to earn that money by joining IPL team once they cross 23.
bulbul Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 Bhai I am not talking about life ban on them' date=' just U23. They will still have enough time to earn that money by joining IPL team once they cross 23.[/quote'] put yourself into shoes of a 22 year old cricketer (even better a 22 year old cricketer from very backward place,without any mentor support and have to take care a family)..if you are are given option of getting $10,000 now or soem chance of getting into Indian team (depens on various factors) what you will do ? i agree if a Player is very taleneted he can wait ? but normal guys (ex Vinay,Arvind,Jakati kind guys U22..not the na,es i mentoned here etc) why should they loose whatever comes their way..any way their state teams also wont ban them for participating in IPL so why not take the chance rather than just trying for something that may or may not happen? why for the sake of say 10% other 90% has to suffer ?
rkt.india Posted April 11, 2012 Author Posted April 11, 2012 put yourself into shoes of a 22 year old cricketer (even better a 22 year old cricketer from very backward place,without any mentor support and have to take care a family)..if you are are given option of getting $10,000 now or soem chance of getting into Indian team (depens on various factors) what you will do ? i agree if a Player is very taleneted he can wait ? but normal guys (ex Vinay,Arvind,Jakati kind guys U22..not the na,es i mentoned here etc) why should they loose whatever comes their way..any way their state teams also wont ban them for participating in IPL so why not take the chance rather than just trying for something that may or may not happen? why for the sake of say 10% other 90% has to suffer ? They get money by playing FC cricket too. They dont play for free and they get govt. jobs as well.
bulbul Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 They get money by playing FC cricket too. They dont play for free and they get govt. jobs as well. how much money..? also what about glitz and glamour ? are they travelling in Flights from one city to another city during FC cricket? also how much time IPL runs 2 months ? how much time FC runs ? time to play one IPL match ? Time to play one FC match ? i appreciate your concern for National team..but reality is different..sorry brah
ganeshran Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 Its ironic how the greater cause is so appealing when we are talking about the livelihoods of other people. Cricketers opt for IPL because it pays more, end of story. not because it has better quality cricket or it contributes to Indian cricket or any other altruistic BS. As professionals with limited shelf life, they are entitled to every avenue of earning money (in a legal way) in the game.
jairamesh Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 The rule is all IPL teams must have a minimum of four under-22 players in their squad.
RedFever Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 Mumbai Indians and KKR in their last match did not play a single U23 player in their XI. Wasn't it compulsory for the teams to play at least one U23 player in their match XI? How would it help these U23 players if they don't even play them in matches? Can anyone shed some light on this rule? this rule has been changes since his 4th IPL.. upto 3rd IPL it was mandatory to have one under 23 in the playing 11
1983-2011 Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 its either under 23 players or players from ur catchment area I think.
Recommended Posts