Jump to content

Richie Benaud's XIs - Your Favorite Team?


Lurker

Recommended Posts

Posted

..and so when Richie Benaud sat down to compile his Greatest XI, he actually selected 66 shortlisted legends. These were then narrowed down to 3 teams, 33 players and the final XI off them. Here are the teams: Team A (the final one): Hobbs, Gavaskar, Bradman, Viv Richards, Tendulkar, Sobers, Imran Khan, Gilchrist, Warne, Lillee, Barnes. Team B: Hutton, Arthur Morris, Wally Hammond, Greg Chappell, Frank Worrell, Keith Miller, Richard Hadlee, Rod Marsh, Bill O Reilley, Lindwall, Trueman. Team C: Victor Trumper, Greenidge, George Headley, Graeme Pollock, Lara, Botham, Kapil Dev, Healey, Qadir, Glen Mcgrath, Larwood. Of the three, I happen to like Team C best actually, including the final XI (A). It has the right mix of style and dare-devilry. The top 5 batting line-up is as good, if not better, than other teams. Bowling wise Larwood, Qadir and Mcgrath are all characters who arent simply famous for picking wickets, folks like Trumper and Pollock mix great performance with history and romanticism of what-could-have been and just thinking of Botham and Kapil batting together gives me an orgasm, and I am not gay :--D Of the three teams which is your favorite?

Guest BossBhai
Posted

-- Removed on request of the user --

Posted

Team A by far. The team has too much depth inbatting as well as bowling, and Team B is the weakest of the lot. However I would have loved to see one of Holding/Marshall/Garner/McGrath/Wasim in Team A instead of Sobers. The team already has depth in batting with likes of Gilchrist and Imran, and another pacer would have been ideal.

Posted
The team which has Bradman in it ' date=' will always leave any other team miles behind in batting department.[/quote'] :haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Posted
Team A by far. The team has too much depth inbatting as well as bowling' date=' and Team B is the weakest of the lot. However I would have loved to see one of Holding/Marshall/Garner/McGrath/Wasim in Team A instead of Sobers. The team already has depth in batting with likes of Gilchrist and Imran, and another pacer would have been ideal.[/quote'] 3 seamer + Sobers.
Posted
:haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
What's there to laugh. He'll score a hundred almost every innings. Will give more than significant edge to his teams batting line up. :winky:
Posted
What's there to laugh. He'll score a hundred almost every innings. Will give more than significant edge to his teams batting line up. :winky:
Yes Bradman would have averaged 100 against Marshall,Roberts,Garner. :--D Keep this crap away from me.
Posted
3 seamer + Sobers.
But Sobers wasn't a genuines wkt taker with bowling average in 30s. I would add another out and out seamer from one of the WI quartet in 80s or Wasim. The point is with likes of Bradman in the team and Gilchrist and Imran batting till 7 or 8 you would rather add another bowler to make it tougher for the opposition. Against this bowling attack they will have no breathing space.
Posted

Not bad but anything before 1970 is irrelvant, it was not real cricket back then Mine would be: 1. Sunil Gavaskar 2. Viv Richards 3. Rahul Dravid 4. Sachin Tendulkar 5. Steve Waugh (captain) 6. Brian Lara 7. Adam Gilchrist (wk) 8. Wasim Akram 9. Curtly Ambrose 10. Murali 11. Glenn McGrath 12th man- Andy Flower (also reserve wk)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...