Rajiv Posted August 11, 2007 Posted August 11, 2007 ..we give too much emphasis on Pak series, yes we are rivals..but how is it better than beating the best in the business; that too in their den
MundaPakistani Posted August 11, 2007 Posted August 11, 2007 MM why is the "performance in SA" one of the choices? WIn in PAK for mine, that PAK team had already defeated both SA and NZ and before the Multan test win IND had never won a test match in PAK.
Ram Posted August 11, 2007 Author Posted August 11, 2007 MM why is the "performance in SA" one of the choices? WIn in PAK for mine, that PAK team had already defeated both SA and NZ and before the Multan test win IND had never won a test match in PAK. I had used the term performance because we didnt even draw that series, but it was something i couldnt miss because of our good performance in the first test.
MundaPakistani Posted August 11, 2007 Posted August 11, 2007 I had used the term performance because we didnt even draw that series' date=' but it was something i couldnt miss because of our good performance in the first test.[/quote'] SA these days aren't a "great" test team(certainly not as good as Cronje's team) so winning 1 test yet losing the series is no great feat IMO. I reckon IND's performance in ENG in 02 was far superior than their performance in SA.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now