seedhi Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 Namorons cant understand because they think police machinery can be used for their whims and fancies' date=' but law is very clear on this. [b']I cannot go and approach a minister to stalk me and use police machinery for the same. A govt has to work for public good, not to help some acquaintance because she has no problem with it. It is height of nepotism and illegal .Yes you can. You are perfectly within your rights to approach a minister with such a request. The minister is perfectly within his rights to ask his subordinate to provide you with protection (within the parameters of law). The minister's role ends there, and the police's role begins. If a permission from MHA was not taken then it is the fault of the the local police. But as an AAPtard, such subtleties of law need not concern you, as you are in favour of stopping women (preferably dark skinned) in the middle of the night with your goons and making them urinate on the road in full public view. AAPtards ke saathi Somnath Bharti !
seedhi Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 Child marriage is perfectly legal if they decides to not annul the marriage within 2 years of reaching adulthood. He lived with her for three years and ran way without giving her an option. I am sure she must have suffered all her life battling questions about her marital life. As I said these things between couples doent matter to me as a voter.So you do not believe the wife even who left on her own to complete her education ? I have little hope that your AAPtard brain will be able to parse the following statement from his wife, but still ... When I came to Vadnagar to live with his family, he told me “why did you come to your in-laws’ house when you are still so young, you must instead focus on pursuing your studiesâ€. The decision to leave was my own and there was never any conflict between us.
seedhi Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 Those days 90% of marriages were child marriages so no point of bringing the legal aspects. And separation was not mutual. He just abandoned her.Again, hoping against hope that perhaps your AAPtard brain (addled as it is with bhakti of Somnath Bharti) can process simple English .. When I came to Vadnagar to live with his family, he told me “why did you come to your in-laws’ house when you are still so young, you must instead focus on pursuing your studiesâ€. The decision to leave was my own and there was never any conflict between us. http://www.financialexpress.com/news/narendra-modis-wife-jashodaben-finally-speaks-i-like-to-read-about-him-%28modi%29...-i-know-he-will-become-pm/1222311/2
urbestfriend Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 “I will not say anything against my husband. He is very powerful. This job is all I have to survive. I am afraid of the consequences.” This is in 2009. http://www.openthemagazine.com/article/nation/i-am-narendra-modi-s-wife Completely understand why she has fell in line just like the stalked woman did. Of course, Namorons are morally and intellectually bankrupt to see the obvious and bring irrelevant legal loopholes etc to defend their masters.
seedhi Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 This is in 2009. http://www.openthemagazine.com/article/nation/i-am-narendra-modi-s-wife Completely understand why she has fell in line just like the stalked woman did. Of course, Namorons are morally and intellectually bankrupt to see the obvious and bring irrelevant legal loopholes etc to defend their masters.AAPtards seem to be mentally retarded as to not understand the following simple statement that she made just two months ago this year: The decision to leave was my own and there was never any conflict between us. He never spoke to me about the RSS or about his political leanings. http://www.financialexpress.com/news/narendra-modis-wife-jashodaben-finally-speaks-i-like-to-read-about-him-%28modi%29...-i-know-he-will-become-pm/1222311/2 When women actually do complain like those who were made to urinate by maha-AAPtard Somnath Bharti - he is protected, praised and elevated by fellow AAPtards. In AAPtard world: Number of women complaining against Modi = 0 ---> Modi is guilty. Women file police complaints against Somnath Bharti for harassment and making them urinate in public ---> Somnath Bharti is a great leader of AAP for fighting crime.
ganeshran Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 Please discuss without making ad-hominem remarks towards other members. I thought this was settled after the last round of suar-kutta debates Epithets like chaddi, AAPtard are fine, but please refrain from insulting other members.
ravishingravi Posted April 12, 2014 Posted April 12, 2014 Those days 90% of marriages were child marriages so no point of bringing the legal aspects. And separation was not mutual. He just abandoned her. 90%. Where did you get that from ?
ravishingravi Posted April 12, 2014 Posted April 12, 2014 This is in 2009. http://www.openthemagazine.com/article/nation/i-am-narendra-modi-s-wife Completely understand why she has fell in line just like the stalked woman did. Of course, Namorons are morally and intellectually bankrupt to see the obvious and bring irrelevant legal loopholes etc to defend their masters. Yeah those corrupt people talking of legal things. When will they learn that it's not all about logic. It is about feelings and emotions. Right ?
ravishingravi Posted April 12, 2014 Posted April 12, 2014 Reverse the roles. A woman married off at age of 17. Refuses to accept her marriage and leaves the house. You will neo feminist, liberals and AAPies parading her as symbol of empowerment and strength. Confused lot these AAPies.
JaiRamesh2 Posted April 12, 2014 Posted April 12, 2014 Bharka Dutt and Rajdeep Sardesai's role in Gujarat 2002 riots undefined Transcript (translated to eng): It was my endeavour that we restore peace at the earliest possible. If you look at the data you will see that in 72 hours we had put down the riots and brought the situation under control. But these TV channels kept on playing up the same incidents over and over again. At the time, Rajdeep and Barkha were in the same channel NDTV. During those inflamed days, Barkha acted in the most irresponsible manner. Surat had not witnessed any communal killings, barring a few small incidents of clashes. However the bazaars were closed [as a precautionary measure]. Barkha stood amidst closed shops screaming “This is Surat’s diamond market, but there is not a single police man here.†I phoned Barkha and said, “Are you providing the address of this “unprotected†bazaar to the rioting mobs? Are you inviting them to come and create trouble there by announcing that there is no police here so you can run amok safely?†In a second incident in Anjar, she played up the news that a Hanuman mandir had been broken and vandalized. I told her, “What are you up to? You are in Kutch which is a border district. There you are showing the attack and destruction of a mandir. Do you realize the implications of broadcasting such news? We haven’t yet recovered from the earthquake. Have you actually done proper investigation into the riots? Why are you lighting fires for us? Your news takes a few minutes to broadcast that such and such place is unprotected or a mandir has been vandalized. But it takes for me a few hours to move the police from one disturbed location to another since these incidents are breaking out in the most unexpected places.†What is worse, when I got the matter enquired into by the local police, we found out that it was a small, insignificant structure under a tree which had been damaged a little bit by some crazy individual. But NDTV presented it as an attack on a Hanuman mandir. When the fires were raging these journalists were pouring fuel on those fires. On that day I had put a ban on TV channels because they were actually provoking trouble. But it was only for one day. Since Rajdeep Sardesai was among the leading reporters covering the disturbances, I phoned him to say, “I will have to put a temporary ban on your channel if you continue with the provocative coverage. There is a well-established regulation that media should not name communities during communal riots nor identify a damaged placed as a mandir or masjid. Why are you violating that code and well set protocol about not naming communities or identifying places, of worship? You are going against established norms.â€
bulbul Posted April 12, 2014 Posted April 12, 2014 Please discuss without making ad-hominem remarks towards other members. I thought this was settled after the last round of suar-kutta debates Epithets like chaddi, AAPtard are fine, but please refrain from insulting other members. What about Chaddi-less :--D
Sachin=GOD Posted April 12, 2014 Posted April 12, 2014 Narendra Modi @narendramodi Will appear on 'Aap Ki Adalat' with @RajatSharmaLive this evening. Watch it at 10 PM on @indiatvnews http://nm4.in/1sPURcc finally!!!!
bulbul Posted April 12, 2014 Posted April 12, 2014 Narendra Modi @narendramodi Will appear on 'Aap Ki Adalat' with @RajatSharmaLive this evening. Watch it at 10 PM on @indiatvnews http://nm4.in/1sPURcc finally!!!! Then dont blame Rajat Sharma was bought out :((
urbestfriend Posted April 12, 2014 Posted April 12, 2014 Then dont blame Rajat Sharma was bought out :(( we all know who has financed Indian TV..! Check with biggest Namoron Madhu kishwar for confirmation.
bulbul Posted April 12, 2014 Posted April 12, 2014 we all know who has financed Indian TV..! Check with biggest Namoron Madhu kishwar for confirmation. I Don't know..is that same like Ford foundation funding AAP?
urbestfriend Posted April 12, 2014 Posted April 12, 2014 I Don't know..is that same like Ford foundation funding AAP? Thats why I asked you to check with one of your ilk , and biggest NAMOron , Madhu Kishwar.
bulbul Posted April 12, 2014 Posted April 12, 2014 Thats why I asked you to check with one of your ilk ' date=' and biggest NAMOron , Madhu Kishwar.[/quote'] That's what i said,i dont know her. But i am asking you, is that same like how AAP funded by Ford foundation?
Sachin=GOD Posted April 12, 2014 Posted April 12, 2014 I Don't know..is that same like Ford foundation funding AAP? how does that matter in THIS thread?
bulbul Posted April 12, 2014 Posted April 12, 2014 how does that matter in THIS thread? Same like how ownership of India TV mattered,Why should i ask Madhu Kishwar? Atleast you can wait till Interview is over right?
Recommended Posts