Manny_Pacquiao Posted August 4, 2012 Share Posted August 4, 2012 Manny pakau' date=' most of the pepople agree here that he got beaten. We are just mad that how the our appeal got rejected and the American's got accepted.[/quote'] i saw the sangwan one, it was nowhere near as bad as this. no ref mistakes either. decisions got overturned based on refereeing mistakes, not on scoring. in the case of the japanese guy, it was the ref's failure to give a count, in the case of spence-vikas, it was a failure to penalise for spitting the mouthpiece along with excessive holding. and that was a great run out by manoj tiwary B-> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
veer Posted August 4, 2012 Share Posted August 4, 2012 The only problem that I see is that he wod have fought differently in 3rd round if he had known correct score Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manny_Pacquiao Posted August 4, 2012 Share Posted August 4, 2012 The only problem that I see is that he wod have fought differently in 3rd round if he had known correct score ?? bhaisaab, he could barely stand on his feet in the 3rd rd. had he gone toe to toe with spence, he would have hit the floor... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Outsider Posted August 4, 2012 Share Posted August 4, 2012 i saw the sangwan one, it was nowhere near as bad as this. no ref mistakes either. decisions got overturned based on refereeing mistakes, not on scoring. in the case of the japanese guy, it was the ref's failure to give a count, in the case of spence-vikas, it was a failure to penalise for spitting the mouthpiece along with excessive holding. and that was a great run out by manoj tiwary B-> Wouldn't he have just got a warning the first time? Not very aware of boxing rules etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSK Fan Posted August 4, 2012 Share Posted August 4, 2012 i saw the sangwan one, it was nowhere near as bad as this. no ref mistakes either. decisions got overturned based on refereeing mistakes, not on scoring. in the case of the japanese guy, it was the ref's failure to give a count, in the case of spence-vikas, it was a failure to penalise for spitting the mouthpiece along with excessive holding. and that was a great run out by manoj tiwary B-> Rule is, you cannot penalise unless you give two previous warnings. What are you talking about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manny_Pacquiao Posted August 4, 2012 Share Posted August 4, 2012 Rule is' date=' you cannot penalise unless you give two previous warnings. What are you talking about?[/quote'] ?? he spat his mouthpiece out intentionally. automatic penalty, automatic deduction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crookbond Posted August 4, 2012 Share Posted August 4, 2012 Enough of a discussion! If a Boxer’s gumshield falls down for the first time, a caution will be given by the RefereeThereafter, every time the gumshield falls down, a warning will be issued In the case where the gumshield is out of the Boxer’s mouth, the Referee shall take the Boxer to the Boxer’s corner, have the gumshield washed and returned to its proper positionWhile this is being done, the Second is not allowed to talk to the Boxer 127 If the Boxer intentionally spits out his/her gumshield, an immediate warning shall be issued Read the rules. It's quite clear that there has to be a "warning issued". http://aiba.org/documents/site1/docs/technical_and_competition_rules_FINAL.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kabira Posted August 4, 2012 Share Posted August 4, 2012 ^if thats the case then its quite unfortunate...Indian boxing should have gone all out.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manny_Pacquiao Posted August 4, 2012 Share Posted August 4, 2012 http://www.nbcolympics.com/video/boxing/full-fight-errol-spence-vs-krishan-vikas-round-of-16-bout.html watch it again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raghav_12 Posted August 4, 2012 Share Posted August 4, 2012 http://www.nbcolympics.com/video/boxing/full-fight-errol-spence-vs-krishan-vikas-round-of-16-bout.html watch it again. Not available outside USA.. any other link? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manny_Pacquiao Posted August 4, 2012 Share Posted August 4, 2012 can't help you, thats the only link i use. will look around india has another boxer going today, manoj kumar in the light welter against a top seeded british guy. the other brits have had decisions going in their favour so far, so it doesnt look good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crookbond Posted August 4, 2012 Share Posted August 4, 2012 ^if thats the case then its quite unfortunate...Indian boxing should have gone all out.. The irony is - he didn't deserve to win but not because of the gumshield but on punch point scores. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raghav_12 Posted August 4, 2012 Share Posted August 4, 2012 can't help you, thats the only link i use. will look around india has another boxer going today, manoj kumar in the light welter against a top seeded british guy. the other brits have had decisions going in their favour so far, so it doesnt look good. Thanks.. Not finding anything on youtube. other than news clippings.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manny_Pacquiao Posted August 4, 2012 Share Posted August 4, 2012 the official statement has come out, for those of u that still care...lol There were a total of nine (9) holding fouls committed by the Indian boxer in the third round alone. However the Referee only gave one caution; In the second round, at the time 02:38, the boxer from India spitted out his gum shield intentionally. However the Referee didn’t give any warning. Based on these findings, the Competition Jury Members unanimously decided the following: Decision #1: Based on the AIBA Technical & Competition Rules 12.1.9, the Referee should have given at least two (2) warnings to the Indian boxer; Decision #2: Although the boxer from India intentionally spitted out his gumshield, the Referee’s view was blocked by the boxer from the USA and was not able to see the action; Final Decision: Based on Decision #1, at least four (4) points should have been awarded to the boxer from the USA. Therefore the final score should be 13:15 in favour of the USA. The protest is accepted and the winner of Bout #142 is Errol Spence (USA). like i said, only the refereeing mistakes are overturned. india accepted the decision, btw. move on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crookbond Posted August 5, 2012 Share Posted August 5, 2012 There were holding fouls committed by Errol Spence too! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now