bharat297 Posted March 4, 2013 Posted March 4, 2013 I think Lyon still is a good bowler. I think Australia have to remember a couple of things: 1) They're not going to find a Shane Warne but even Shane Warne got smashed in India the first few times. India are very good players of spin bowling. Nathan Lyon is still very inexperienced and for the number of games he's played, he's doing a lot better than many other spinners in history. 2) With 1 front-line spinner in the team (whether its Lyon or Doherty or even Warne), you can't score < 350 in your first innings against India and expect to be able defend that. Australia's batsman are letting them down and they've dropped the spinners instead.
Vanarp22 Posted March 4, 2013 Posted March 4, 2013 I think Lyon still is a good bowler. I think Australia have to remember a couple of things: 1) They're not going to find a Shane Warne but even Shane Warne got smashed in India the first few times. India are very good players of spin bowling. Nathan Lyon is still very inexperienced and for the number of games he's played, he's doing a lot better than many other spinners in history. 2) With 1 front-line spinner in the team (whether its Lyon or Doherty or even Warne), you can't score < 350 in your first innings against India and expect to be able defend that. Australia's batsman are letting them down and they've dropped the spinners instead. My sentiments exactly. Lyon is a decent bowler who just happened to get smashed last Test.
Ultimate_Game Posted March 4, 2013 Posted March 4, 2013 Ohhhhhhhh so thats why they call him Dartbhajan' date=' [b']because of his huge wides that he bowls down the leg side :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: People prefer to call them "darts on or down the leg stump"
Vivek.S.123 Posted March 4, 2013 Posted March 4, 2013 People prefer to call them "darts on or down the leg stump" :giggle:
SLICKR392 Posted March 4, 2013 Author Posted March 4, 2013 I'm talking about generally in international cricket' date=' not just Tests.[/quote'] He has faired well enough in LOIs.
Ultimate_Game Posted March 4, 2013 Posted March 4, 2013 Show some respect to the million dollar man :giggle:
SLICKR392 Posted March 4, 2013 Author Posted March 4, 2013 This great batting by Murali. They way this parternership is building we may see record breaking partnership coming tomorrow. So yep Murali Vijay the man for the job, GG better work on more for saving his seat in limited over games. IMO benched player Tiwary atm more eligible & deserving to get in the nat squad than GG. Yeah sure. Stick with hacks like Vijay after he scores a ton against a lame bowling attack and get pwned againt Saffers dynamite bowling line up. GG will be back after the break unlike some of the other lazy holes in the team he is determined. Utter foolish and delusive after 1 Vijay ton to write him off.
Vanarp22 Posted March 4, 2013 Posted March 4, 2013 Show some respect to the million dollar man :giggle: :emc:
Vanarp22 Posted March 4, 2013 Posted March 4, 2013 But its BK who is the problem and can't bowl on subcontinent wickets' date=' Isshaanntt should be persisted with :orderorder:[/quote'] trololol BK just took 3 wickets in 4 overs
oneANDone Posted March 4, 2013 Posted March 4, 2013 Seems most of people here want to fail Vijay/Jadeja.. so that they claim they are true in judging players.. :cantstop: Think his point of view, no matter how many runs he scored, he wont be part of regular test side... unless until anyone of delhi duo got hammered/injured.. its just matter of time gumbir get into side.. and this poor guy being sidelined..
India-KXIP fan Posted March 4, 2013 Posted March 4, 2013 lol @ Clarke. :hysterical: Pattinson and Siddle are no Bhuvneshwar Kumar, what was he thinking? This has to be the worst attack I've seen in a while. The spinners are even worse.
Crookbond Posted March 4, 2013 Posted March 4, 2013 He's not meant to be a bowler actually. It's the same thing they did with Cameron Smith in 2008. Maxwell is a batting all-rounder they have picked at No.8 in the bowling slot. It doesn't make any sense. Australia blundered by not picking Steven O'Keefe. He's a left-arm orthodox who is a decent batsman too. They could have combined him with Lyon and pick Krejza probably as the back up offspinner. You combined Cameron White from 2008 series and Steve Smith from 2010 series to make a new player named Cameron Smith in 2013. Amusing!
rkt.india Posted March 4, 2013 Posted March 4, 2013 I just dont know he is suddenly called a bowler. He was nothing more than a part timer even for Aus emerging team ib EPT. He is a batsman.
Ultimate_Game Posted March 4, 2013 Posted March 4, 2013 I just dont know he is suddenly called a bowler. He was nothing more than a part timer even for Aus emerging team ib EPT. He is a batsman. Not really. He's a bits & pieces player in the mould of players Eng used to field in 90s a la Ealhams, Hoallioakes, Dougie Browns etc. At the end of the day they could neither score nor take wkts. Same with Maxwell, Steven Smith and Cameron White.
SLICKR392 Posted March 4, 2013 Author Posted March 4, 2013 I just dont know he is suddenly called a bowler. He was nothing more than a part timer even for Aus emerging team ib EPT. He is a batsman. He is an AR with an avg. of under 35 in Aussie conditions. As a all round spin bowler he is expected to deliver in these (Indian/SC) conditions.
Crookbond Posted March 4, 2013 Posted March 4, 2013 Hoping we can push for 700 today. Revenge for Sydney 2012!!! Revenge for Sydney shouldn't be statistical but moral and physical. Even if we score 550 and shoot them down for 100 odd, I will take it.
Crookbond Posted March 4, 2013 Posted March 4, 2013 Not really. He's a bits & pieces player in the mould of players Eng used to field in 90s a la Ealhams' date=' Hoallioakes, Dougie Browns etc. At the end of the day they could neither score nor take wkts. Same with Maxwell, Steven Smith and Cameron White.[/quote'] You are passing on a judgment on Maxwell's batting too soon I guess. I think he's a much better batsman than some of the names you have mentioned. It is however hilarious to even call him as a bowler, I couldn't stop laughing my guts out yesterday. :hysterical:ŽÃ
rkt.india Posted March 4, 2013 Posted March 4, 2013 Not really. He's a bits & pieces player in the mould of players Eng used to field in 90s a la Ealhams' date=' Hoallioakes, Dougie Browns etc. At the end of the day they could neither score nor take wkts. Same with Maxwell, Steven Smith and Cameron White.[/quote'] his bowling is like Raina and Rohit Sharma, cant even say bits and pieces but he is a better batsmen than what his bowling is. He is mainly an LOI player.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now