saneindian Posted February 10, 2013 Author Posted February 10, 2013 4 fielders on the boundary when ROI have got more than 440 runs to defend in 42 overs
saneindian Posted February 10, 2013 Author Posted February 10, 2013 LSRK talking about Ojha having changed his run up from a diagonal one to a straighter one. Says was bowling with the changed run up in the 1st innings and has gone up to his old run up now.
Lord Posted February 10, 2013 Posted February 10, 2013 Rahane can be tried too imo,he bats at 3 for Mumbai,can open imo
saneindian Posted February 10, 2013 Author Posted February 10, 2013 What an idiotic field setting by Bhajji.
Cevno Posted February 10, 2013 Posted February 10, 2013 Rahane can be tried too imo' date='he bats at 3 for Mumbai,can open imo[/quote'] Would much rather have him in the middle order, imo. 5 or 6 where you have to face 2nd new ball anyway. Even in this match Tare who is not a opener is opening and not him.
saneindian Posted February 10, 2013 Author Posted February 10, 2013 Bhajji having a go at Ojha for not trying to catch that skier lol
Cevno Posted February 10, 2013 Posted February 10, 2013 ABP News @abpnewstv Selection of Team India for Test series against Australia today; Harbhajan and Sreesanth likely to get chance
Lord Posted February 10, 2013 Posted February 10, 2013 Would much rather have him in the middle order, imo. 5 or 6 where you have to face 2nd new ball anyway. Even in this match Tare who is not a opener is opening and not him. yes,maybe they are preparing Tare for thr job,since Rahane is our permanent waterboy. but it can be tried
Cevno Posted February 10, 2013 Posted February 10, 2013 yes,maybe they are preparing Tare for thr job,since Rahane is our permanent waterboy. but it can be tried Why you wanna experiment with him in the top order when the middle order spot is empty ? They'll pick Raina for that otherwise.
Lord Posted February 10, 2013 Posted February 10, 2013 Why you wanna experiment with him in the top order when the middle order spot is empty ? They'll pick Raina for that otherwise. at the top you need a sedate guy with decent technique.Rahane fits the bill imo at 6,we need a free flowing player who can bat with the tail.like Rohit/Rayudu Rahane's game seems closer to an opener than no6. anyway Raina is certain to be selected now:((
Cevno Posted February 10, 2013 Posted February 10, 2013 at the top you need a sedate guy with decent technique.Rahane fits the bill imo at 6,we need a free flowing player who can bat with the tail.like Rohit/Rayudu Rahane's game seems closer to an opener than no6. anyway Raina is certain to be selected now:(( Rahane is a busy batsman who likes to rotate strike. He is not a opener for that reason as a opener has to go through long patches of no runs and defending. Plus at 6 and 7 many times you have to face second new ball anyway, which is what both Raina and Dhoni struggled with in England. Neither Rohit or Rayudu are sloggers either.
Cevno Posted February 10, 2013 Posted February 10, 2013 Rahane may do well opening in India but he will certainly do better in the middle order abroad, imo.
Cevno Posted February 10, 2013 Posted February 10, 2013 Rahane was known to be a attacking batsman and quicker scorer than Rohit when he was averaging 69. He is more circumspect these days perhaps because he is out of form. He may not be a power hitter but he isn't a Aakash Chopra type player either, which is a impression some have. He can score quicker than Rohit and Rayudu in the longer form easily even though they might have edge in shorter forms.
kubrickian Posted February 10, 2013 Posted February 10, 2013 Rahane looks like a proper test batsmen with the right technique and temperament. He should always be in the reckoning over Raina and Rohit. Rayudu is also a good batsman but I doubt he will get picked for this series.
Cevno Posted February 10, 2013 Posted February 10, 2013 @APRAMEYAC: Selection committee meeting is over. India Test team out soon #IndvsAus"
Lord Posted February 10, 2013 Posted February 10, 2013 Rahane is a busy batsman who likes to rotate strike. He is not a opener for that reason as a opener has to go through long patches of no runs and defending. Plus at 6 and 7 many times you have to face second new ball anyway, which is what both Raina and Dhoni struggled with in England. Neither Rohit or Rayudu are sloggers either. an opener needs to rotate strike too.can't allow bowlers to bowl at one batsman only.Smith an Peterson regularly do that. I'd rather care about 1st new ball than 2nd. Rohit and Rayudu are strokeplayers like VVS.they dont get bogged down,we dont need sloggers there.Tiwary is an option too there
Cevno Posted February 10, 2013 Posted February 10, 2013 Probably calling Srinivasan right now and asking if he wants to Veto something. :giggle:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now