carnish Posted March 17, 2013 Posted March 17, 2013 Did he have a good tour in England? Aside from 2 good performances, he was at the end of his form. You really are in a dream world my sir.
BeautifulGame Posted March 17, 2013 Posted March 17, 2013 How is Sachin tied with him? Its your opinion nonetheless but how on earth is Sachin tied with him. Ponting' date=' Lara and Dravid all have almost the same average and both Dravid and Ponting has scored more tons and runs than Lara did.[/quote'] Longevity doesnt define greatness.It also matters how hard and the quality of quality of opposition the runs were scored. Lara and Sachin scored runs when almost all opposition had all time great bowlers and when run scoring was much harder in 90s.Ponting and Dravid scored mostly 2000 when the batting was much easier and never really faced the all-time great bowlers that much.
BeautifulGame Posted March 17, 2013 Posted March 17, 2013 3' date=' I think.[/quote'] 2 300's and 1 299 n.o iirc.
FreakazoiD Posted March 17, 2013 Posted March 17, 2013 I think the OP has a point. We celebrate Sachin as the greatest ever because he has 100 100s, but then a 100 doesn't win you test matches, but a 200 or a 300 might. It is purely a man-made milestone that we see on a player's stats page, but then it could so easily have been "number of 200s" and "number of 300s", rather than "number of 50s" and "number of 100s". The one metric that is independent of these man-made milestones is the batting average, and while Sachin's is good, it isn't the best. That Sachin has scored more runs that anybody else is a sign of longevity, fitness and desire to play. If one believes those things count in the judge of the greatness of a batsman, then Sachin is the best there will ever be. Its all subjective in the end.
The Outsider Posted March 17, 2013 Posted March 17, 2013 I think the OP has a point. We celebrate Sachin as the greatest ever because he has 100 100s' date=' but then a 100 doesn't win you test matches, but a 200 or a 300 might. It is purely a man-made milestone that we see on a player's stats page, but then it could so easily have been "number of 200s" and "number of 300s", rather than "number of 50s" and "number of 100s". [b']The one metric that is independent of these man-made milestones is the batting average, and while Sachin's is good, it isn't the best. Batting average is divine? Rest is all man made moh maya.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now