rkt.india Posted March 21, 2013 Posted March 21, 2013 While the Indians were scything through the Aussie batting line-up at Mohali for a win inside four days, made possible by their new opening pair, the just-discarded duo of Virender Sehwag and Gautam Gambhir was taking fresh guard together some 300 km away in Gurgaon. Just a handful of people at the secluded 'green' TERI Gram — built on power-saving techniques — witnessed the duo's spine-tingling start to a 161-run chase in the Syed Mushtaq Ali national T20 opener against Punjab. Clad in Delhi's yellow and blue, away from fans and media with Sehwag even dumping his spectacles, they, as MS Dhoni insists in media sessions, 'expressed themselves'. Bright start Sehwag found the meat early against paceman Sandeep Sharma, glancing one to fine leg and then clearing mid on; an edge to third man fence completed the over. Gambhir, deciding not to play the sheet anchor he is known for, survived jitters. Siddharth Kaul got some bounce that left Gambhir missing a couple of swats and then mistiming one. Through the early part, while Viru blazed away to a 26-ball 36, the Gauti rushed into his shots. He was dropped twice, survived a run-out chance once. But he soon found his groove when a full delivery was creamed through covers. From thereon, Gambhir waited, saw and smashed. After Sehwag was caught short of his crease in a rather clumsy manner, not grounding his bat even after reaching the crease, and Unmukt Chand holing one to deep point for a duck, Gambhir took charge and guided the chase as Puneet Bisht went berserk. The Viru-Gauti combine realized 76 in just 8.3 overs. When Sehwag last played in national T20s — just last season — he was eyeing return to India team from injury. Since then, he has been axed from the T20 squad, then from the ODI squad and finally from Tests. This time though, he seems to be eyeing a return — as a pair with Gambhir. Brief Scores Punjab 160/7 (Gurkeerat 57, M Sidhana 35, V Sood 2/24, P Negi 2/36, P Awana 1/37) lost to Delhi 162/4 in 19.1 overs (G Gambhir 68*, V Sehwag 36, P Bisht 32) J&K 108/7 (S Khajuria 61, I Khan 2/16, A Sakuja 2/23) lost to Services 109/5 in 19.2 overs (N Verma 39*, R Paliwal 22) by five wickets. http://www.hindustantimes.com/Cricket/CricketNews/Open-sesame-Viru-Gauti-come-good-in-different-hue/Article1-1028514.aspx Looks like good preparation for IPL but there's more to that. Beyond the numbers, their performance certainly wasn't something to write home about. Sehwag started by lifting seamer Sandeep Sharma over mid-on for a boundary but the next couple of fours were streaky shots. Sehwag was playing without those spectacles but the manner of his run-out will again put question marks on his casual approach. Trying to steal a quick single, Sehwag didn't bother to either ground his bat or enter the crease as Punjab glovesman Chandan Madan whipped off the bails in a flash. Gambhir, was scratchy from the beginning. Even medium pacer Siddharth Kaul was able to hurry the left-hander into his shots with short-pitched stuff as he was never in control of his pulls. On two occasions, the 'butter fingered' Punjab fielders dropped dollies. In fact on the second occasion, Gambhir's slog off Rahul Sharma's delivery was dropped by long-on fielder but the batsman didn't even go for a single. The only time he looked in his elements was when he smacked two sixes over deep mid-wicket. Great players will tell how difficult it is to motivate oneself in the confines of domestic cricket having 'been there and done that' at the international level. Gambhir and Sehwag at times did look out of place while fielding. As the other Delhi boys were wearing DDCA caps, Gambhir was seen in a Red Bull cap (he's a brand ambassador) and Sehwag in a red baseball cap. Read more at: http://www.thatscricket.com/news/2013/03/19/sehwag-gambhir-begin-their-2nd-innings-066518.html
SLICKR392 Posted March 21, 2013 Posted March 21, 2013 Still a lot to do. Sehwag was out for single digit in the previous game. List A's won't do.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now