The Master Posted January 3, 2007 Posted January 3, 2007 The reason why Kumble will always be considered a very ordinary bowler is because of the tripe he bowls in pressure situations. Just look at the tripe him and zaheer are bolwing Warne is great coz he puts pressure on the batsmen and hardly gives them any freebies like Kumble Really pathetic stuff from the Indians...firstly throwing away the batting advantage and then bowling utter garbage
The Master Posted January 3, 2007 Author Posted January 3, 2007 Re: The difference between warne and kumble our chut.iya bowlers are leaking runs at this rate SA will score 500 in no time and we will loose this test match. MARK MY WORDS WE WILL LOOSE THIS TEST.
The_Black_Prince Posted January 3, 2007 Posted January 3, 2007 Re: The difference between warne and kumble Once we just "loose" and do not lose.
Legend Posted January 3, 2007 Posted January 3, 2007 Re: The difference between warne and kumble :hic: lol achaa hooa yaar bata diya.. mujeh toh pata nahi thaa
DesiChap Posted January 3, 2007 Posted January 3, 2007 Re: The difference between warne and kumble SA bowling was even worse as we were 153/0. Good stuff to pick up a wkt by India :lmao:
Dhondy Posted January 3, 2007 Posted January 3, 2007 Re: The difference between warne and kumble I wouldn't even go as far as Warne. What worries me is that Kumble has been outbowled so far by a rookie spinner on a subcontinent type wicket.
King Tendulkar Posted January 4, 2007 Posted January 4, 2007 Re: The difference between warne and kumble Stupid thread as Jumbo grabs 4 and demolishes the SA tail. :wtg:
DesiChap Posted January 4, 2007 Posted January 4, 2007 Re: The difference between warne and kumble Master disappears as usual when India does well
yoda Posted January 4, 2007 Posted January 4, 2007 Re: The difference between warne and kumble Master disappears as usual when India does well He doesn't like giving gallis to the opposition. What can he do? :shrug:
Don Posted January 4, 2007 Posted January 4, 2007 Re: The difference between warne and kumble He has 14 wkts at 21 from 3 test matches. This is as overseas as it gets. Terrific performance from Kumble, so much for a home bully.
veer Posted January 4, 2007 Posted January 4, 2007 Re: The difference between warne and kumble kumble will be on hattrick when he bowls in 2nd innings.. :wtg:
Sooda Posted January 4, 2007 Posted January 4, 2007 Re: The difference between warne and kumble Yep. Typical Master, will come out again if were not doing great
The Master Posted January 4, 2007 Author Posted January 4, 2007 Re: The difference between warne and kumble guys i am rite here.....just watch out for the collapse tomorrow....this indian team lacks the fighting spirit (although no indian team has ever had it)....did u c how the fielders were just lumbering around?......this team is useless
yoda Posted January 4, 2007 Posted January 4, 2007 Re: The difference between warne and kumble guys i am rite here.....just watch out for the collapse tomorrow....this indian team lacks the fighting spirit (although no indian team has ever had it)....did u c how the fielders were just lumbering around?......this team is useless How come you never posted right after the first test win?
jcricketer Posted January 4, 2007 Posted January 4, 2007 Re: The difference between warne and kumble Guys, Why this fixation of comparing Kumble and Warne ... and that too looking at the current match ... both are brilliant bowlers and both have done amazing things in their careers. Australia have had awesome success against teams like SA and Pak because of Warne ... India has been near-invincible at home because of Kumble .... Kumble is a great bowler . Period. Particularly the pathetic crop of bowlers we have had since Kaps retired - there have been the Sreenaths and Prasads, but none have dominated opposition batsmen in home series' like Kumble. Lets enjoy greats like Kumble, Warne, Murali, Sachin, Lara rather than comparing and belittling their magnificent careers ... Just a humble point of view ... And in true Indian Cricket Fan Tradition - fingers crossed on winning this one!
King Posted January 4, 2007 Posted January 4, 2007 Re: The difference between warne and kumble Some can't appreciate their own. If there is one man Indians need to be forever indebted to and never question his credentials it is "Anil Kumble". You can fault Tendulkar, Rahul, Ganguly or even Gavaskar but not this fella. It is firstly stupid to expect him to take 5 wickets every inning and neither does Warnie. As someone pointed out above Kumble has 14 wickets at 21 from 3 test matches and the first two test matches it was hardly assisting the spinners. I wouldn't even go as far as Warne. What worries me is that Kumble has been outbowled so far by a rookie spinner on a subcontinent type wicket. Dhondy what's happened to you man? You are questioning each and every one's ability these days based on a day's return. You know the fortunes change in no time and you are undermining someone that is 4th highest wicket taker as well as the biggest match winner India has ever seen.
Anakin Posted January 4, 2007 Posted January 4, 2007 Re: The difference between warne and kumble Absolutely Ravi, agree with you completely.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now