Lord Posted May 19, 2014 Share Posted May 19, 2014 Next Stop. Bigg Boss. :giggle: that irritates me tbh,It means Indian players dont have to fear getting caught fixing as they can still make huge money after that :mad: Link to comment
sachin34357 Posted May 19, 2014 Share Posted May 19, 2014 Good play him in ur cricket team. No offence' date=' but no one in their right mind will have this [b']buffoon in their playing 11. hes a buffoon for his antics but my question relates to spot fixing. Link to comment
Stuge Posted May 19, 2014 Share Posted May 19, 2014 that irritates me tbh' date='It means Indian players dont have to fear getting caught fixing as they can still make huge money after that :mad:[/quote'] It seems crazy to you ,but he is not guilty unless proven ..period . and FFS its just spot fixing .. he has not killed anyone ....aab kya usse fasi dogi spot fixing ke liye :facepalm: Its just allegation which are to be proven .. WTH is srinivasan doing in BCCI which is bizzare over everything .Even he should be kicked out of BCCI IMO. Link to comment
Midfielder Posted May 19, 2014 Share Posted May 19, 2014 It is been two years and they still don't have charges. He is innocent as far as I am concerned. Link to comment
FischerTal Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 It seems crazy to you ,but he is not guilty unless proven ..period . and FFS its just spot fixing .. he has not killed anyone ....aab kya usse fasi dogi spot fixing ke liye :facepalm: Its just allegation which are to be proven .. WTH is srinivasan doing in BCCI which is bizzare over everything .Even he should be kicked out of BCCI IMO. exactly. man has to earn money for a living, so i don't see why he should be ostracized Link to comment
yoda Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 exactly. man has to earn money for a living' date=' so i don't see why he should be ostracized[/quote'] cause we said so. :winky: Link to comment
Lord Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 exactly. man has to earn money for a living' date=' so i don't see why he should be ostracized[/quote'] His earnings and fame shouldnt be due to cricket imo.Same applies to Azharuddin,Jadeja etc. Link to comment
Lord Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 It seems crazy to you ,but he is not guilty unless proven ..period . and FFS its just spot fixing .. he has not killed anyone ....aab kya usse fasi dogi spot fixing ke liye :facepalm: Its just allegation which are to be proven .. WTH is srinivasan doing in BCCI which is bizzare over everything .Even he should be kicked out of BCCI IMO. Why was he banned if hes not guilty?He hasnt challenged it AFAIK. I just dont want fixers to benefit financially due to cricket.He can do anything else for all I care Srini should be kicked out too.That doesnt justify Sreesanth Link to comment
Stuge Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 Why was he banned if hes not guilty?He hasnt challenged it AFAIK. I just dont want fixers to benefit financially due to cricket.He can do anything else for all I care Srini should be kicked out too.That doesnt justify Sreesanth It all allegations right now .. Nothing is proved in the court . I brought Srini to give you an insight ,what kind of double standards BCCI employs . Link to comment
CSK Fan Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 It all allegations right now .. Nothing is proved in the court . I brought Srini to give you an insight ,what kind of double standards BCCI employs . The circumstantial evidence was enough for the police to arrest Sreesanth. And in both ICC and BCCI book, such evidence is enough to ban a player. You do not need the same level of evidence as a court needs to convict. Azhar and particularly Jadeja, were banned with much lessor evidence. Link to comment
Midfielder Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 Sreesanth does not come across like a cheat. Prove it or drop it. Link to comment
Stuge Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 The circumstantial evidence was enough for the police to arrest Sreesanth. And in both ICC and BCCI book' date=' such evidence is enough to ban a player. You do not need the same level of evidence as a court needs to convict. Azhar and particularly Jadeja, were banned with much lessor evidence.[/quote'] Such evidence needs to be proved in the court without which it doesnt make sense. Sent from my XT535 using Tapatalk 2 Link to comment
CSK Fan Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 Such evidence needs to be proved in the court without which it doesnt make sense. Sent from my XT535 using Tapatalk 2 Only if they have to go to jail. BCCI and ICC are private organizations with their own rule books and can ban players even for just talking to bookies and not reporting. Most private companies can fire employees for lack of discipline, which is not illegal under a court of law. Link to comment
vamos_rafa Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 Only if they have to go to jail. BCCI and ICC are private organizations with their own rule books and can ban players even for just talking to bookies and not reporting. Most private companies can fire employees for lack of discipline' date=' which is not illegal under a court of law.[/quote'] Yeah but in some cases even crimes in Pvt organinsations can lead to jail. Case in point is the Satyam saga. If Sreesanth or any cricketer has any underworld links then he can also go to jail. Or even if they are involved in betting which is illegal. Link to comment
CSK Fan Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 Yeah but in some cases even crimes in Pvt organinsations can lead to jail. Case in point is the Satyam saga. If Sreesanth or any cricketer has any underworld links then he can also go to jail. Or even if they are involved in betting which is illegal. Of course. But this part is where you need stringent evidence and have to prove it in a court of law. I was replying to Stuge's point about Sreesanth getting a ban based on no evidence. Link to comment
CG Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 It will be difficult to prove in court as the case is based on a towel. Link to comment
vamos_rafa Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 It will be difficult to prove in court as the case is based on a towel. So true. Problem is in India there are so many loop holes that you can get around things easily and hence its in the interest of the convicted to keep on dragging things. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now