Sidhoni Posted May 31, 2013 Author Share Posted May 31, 2013 How? More balls per wicket for Finn' date= more Runs per wicket for McKay and RPO almost the same. :haha: Isn't more balls per wicket bad? And Mckay has lesser runs per wicket. Link to comment
Sidhoni Posted May 31, 2013 Author Share Posted May 31, 2013 BTW thanks for that comparison DM! :nice: Added to the OP. Link to comment
Crookbond Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 :haha: Isn't more balls per wicket bad? And Mckay has lesser runs per wicket. Oh right I guess - missed that. Thanks! Link to comment
Sidhoni Posted May 31, 2013 Author Share Posted May 31, 2013 Oh right I guess - missed that. Thanks! Happens to the best of us! PS : Where did you get that comparison from? The ICC rankings website? Link to comment
Crookbond Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 Happens to the best of us! PS : Where did you get that comparison from? The ICC rankings website? Starsports website. http://www.starsports.com/cricket/stats/comparisons/BowlerVsBowler/index.htmx?&player1Id=4274&player2Id=5271&competitionFormat=2&TeamAId=3&TeamBId=1 Link to comment
SLICKR392 Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 McKay has won more games to Aus than Finn has for England. A better death bowler and has a lot more variations in LOI compared to Finn which makes him a better ODI bowler than Finn. Overall (Test/T20/ODI) Finn >> McKay Link to comment
FischerTal Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 McKay has won more games to Aus than Finn has for England. A better death bowlers and has a lot more variations in LOI compared to Finn which makes him a better ODI bowler than Finn. Overall (Test/T20/ODI) Finn >> McKay :two_thumbs_up: Link to comment
Sidhoni Posted May 31, 2013 Author Share Posted May 31, 2013 McKay has won more games to Aus than Finn has for England. A better death bowler and has a lot more variations in LOI compared to Finn which makes him a better ODI bowler than Finn. Overall (Test/T20/ODI) Finn >> McKay Agreed. In tests there is no comparison at all. Link to comment
Sidhoni Posted May 31, 2013 Author Share Posted May 31, 2013 Starsports website. http://www.starsports.com/cricket/stats/comparisons/BowlerVsBowler/index.htmx?&player1Id=4274&player2Id=5271&competitionFormat=2&TeamAId=3&TeamBId=1 Thanks :icflove: Can't compare Morgan and Raina there :wall: Link to comment
SLICKR392 Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 Thanks :icflove: Can't compare Morgan and Raina there :wall: Why not? http://www.starsports.com/cricket/stats/comparisons/BatsmanvsBatsman/index.htmx?&player1Id=3823&player2Id=3700&competitionFormat=2&TeamAId=3&TeamBId=4 Link to comment
Sachin=GOD Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 BTW IIRC this new starsports website will be doing LIVE streaming of the Champions Trophy :hmmm: Link to comment
Sidhoni Posted May 31, 2013 Author Share Posted May 31, 2013 Why not? http://www.starsports.com/cricket/stats/comparisons/BatsmanvsBatsman/index.htmx?&player1Id=3823&player2Id=3700&competitionFormat=2&TeamAId=3&TeamBId=4 For me Raina wasn't showing in the list! :wall: Link to comment
Vikrant Dhoni Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 I would pick McKay because he can pick wickets at regular intervals Link to comment
Crookbond Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 For me Raina wasn't showing in the list! :wall: You may have not selected "Batsmen" on the Top of the page. Link to comment
Sidhoni Posted May 31, 2013 Author Share Posted May 31, 2013 You may have not selected "Batsmen" on the Top of the page. I did. I don't what was the problem. I chose ODI - Batsmen. Link to comment
Sidhoni Posted June 10, 2013 Author Share Posted June 10, 2013 We could have had a face off but Cook did not pick Finn. McKay had 2-38 off his 10. Link to comment
MCcricket Posted June 10, 2013 Share Posted June 10, 2013 An innocuous bits and pieces trundler who surprisingly plays for the Aussies, shows how bad things are for them and compare him to a genuine bowler like Finn, no comparisons. Link to comment
NareshK Posted June 10, 2013 Share Posted June 10, 2013 Finn just looks like a better bowler. He has the height, pace and gets the bounce and movement. Looks like a good prospect for tests. McKay may have the better stats in ODIs but he doesnt look special. He looks like one of those ODI specialists who can stick to a good line and length and relies on variations and doesnt give away too many runs. I dont think he is the type of bowler whom the captain will be calling to break a crucial partnership. I rate wicket taking bowlers irrespective of economy because strike bowlers have an immediate impact on the game. So Finn > McKay. Link to comment
SLICKR392 Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 Finn just looks like a better bowler. He has the height, pace and gets the bounce and movement. Looks like a good prospect for tests. McKay may have the better stats in ODIs but he doesnt look special. He looks like one of those ODI specialists who can stick to a good line and length and relies on variations and doesnt give away too many runs. I dont think he is the type of bowler whom the captain will be calling to break a crucial partnership. I rate wicket taking bowlers irrespective of economy because strike bowlers have an immediate impact on the game. So Finn > McKay. More consistent and better than Finn in ODIs. Hands down!! Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now