Govt must have say in appointment of judges to higher courts: Sibal

[Clarke]

The collegium system of appointing judges has not worked to the expectations and the government must have a say in such appointments, Law Minister Kapil Sibal has said as he prepares to move a Cabinet note to scrap the two-decades-old system. He said he would “very soon” move a proposal in the Cabinet to replace the collegium system with the Judicial Appointment Commission which will give a say to the Executive in the appointments of judges to the Supreme Court and High Courts. “We do not think that the collegium system has worked to our expectations. I don’t think it even worked to the expectations of the judiciary,” Mr. Sibal told PTI in an interview while justifying the need for scrapping the system. Mr. Sibal, who took charge of the Law Ministry last month, said the objective of the government and the judiciary is to have the best people as judges who must be chosen with complete transparency and objectivity and there must be broad based consultations. “Just as judges have enormous stake in the appointment of judicial officers in the higher judiciary (Supreme Court and the 24 High Courts), the government has an equal stake. Since both of us have stakes in the appointment of members of the higher judiciary, the consultation of both of them is absolutely necessary. Government must have a say,” he emphasised. Chief Justice of India Altamas Kabir recently strongly defended the collegium system, saying appointments to the higher judiciary are made after “intense deliberations”. When referred to the judiciary’s objections to changing the system, the Law Minister said, “We know the views (of the judiciary). We will take that into account. Again, laws must be acceptable by and large to the stakeholders, that includes the judiciary, it includes the executive, it includes all the players in the field of dispensation of justice,” he said. Under the government proposal, a six-member Judicial Appointments Commission headed by the Chief Justice of India with the Law Minister as a representative of the government would be set up to select judges for the higher courts. The JAC will also have two judges of the Supreme Court, two eminent jurists nominated by the President as members. The government is open to include the Leader of Opposition in the Commission. The proposal to replace the present system of collegium appointing judges will require a Constitutional amendment. The practice of judges appointing judges started after 1993, with the collegium replacing the system of government picking judges for higher judiciary comprising the Supreme Court and High Courts. The collegium is a five-member body headed by the Chief Justice of India and includes four other senior-most judges. The proposal was on the agenda of the Union Cabinet on April 18, but could not be taken up. Mr. Sibal said he would strive to “give life” to the various Law Ministry bills pending in Parliament by getting them enacted. These include the Judicial Standards Accountability Bill. “The government is very keen for the law to be passed and I think the time is ripe,” he said while talking about the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill which has been in the pipeline for quite some time. “I think the opposition is on board. They also want the law to be passed,” he added. The Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill deals with with complaints against Supreme Court and High Court judges. A judge, who makes oral comments against another constitutional authority or individuals, would be liable for judicial misconduct, according to a clause of the bill passed in the Lok Sabha. “We’ll give it life by enacting it. I take decisions as quickly as possible and a lot of work has already been done. I thank all the previous Law Ministers who have done yeoman’s work and I am taking the benefit of that work and hope to push it forward,” he said. Asked about the hurdles he is facing to get the bills passed, Mr. Sibal said he has not yet been confronted with any hurdle. “I think a little bit of tinkering here and there will resolve all issues... these are minor issues. I think the opposition is on board. They also want the law to be passed. The government is very keen for the law to be passed and I think the time is ripe.” When asked whether it was ‘ironical’ that despite the opposition being on board, the bills were pending, he said hopefully, by August there will be no irony.

http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/govt-must-have-say-in-appointment-of-judges-to-higher-courts-sibal/article4775263.ece?homepage=true Ye to game set match championship kar dega

[Sachin=GOD]

Awesome!!! thats exactly what we need - more political interference in the Judiciary :clap: :clap:

[seedhi]

Awesome!!! thats exactly what we need - more political interference in the Judiciary :clap: :clap:

Actually .. India is the only constitutional democracy in the world where judges of the higher judiciary appoint themselves.

[FischerTal]

Actually .. India is the only constitutional democracy in the world where judges of the higher judiciary appoint themselves.

amreeka has worst system for SC judges. lifetime appointment :((

[Sachin=GOD]

Actually .. India is the only constitutional democracy in the world where judges of the higher judiciary appoint themselves.

its not an ideal system but political interference would produce even worse judges who will be in the pockets of politicians.

[FischerTal]

its not an ideal system but political interference would produce even worse judges who will be in the pockets of politicians.

justice katju

[Clarke]

Actually .. India is the only constitutional democracy in the world where judges of the higher judiciary appoint themselves.

Are you for/against this move ?

[seedhi]

Are you for/against this move ?

The Constitution does give the executive a major role in the appointments process, but the Supreme Court - around 20 years ago - reinterpreted the process in its favor and almost completely excluded the executive. I think there is need of reform in the appointments process as well as the issue of post-retirement jobs to ensure that judges do not get influenced by post-retirement jobs. I believe there is some degree of convergence of views of both Congress and BJP on these matters - something like the Judicial Appointments Commission could be more transparent than the present system.

[zumi]

Mr. Sibal, who took charge of the Law Ministry last month, said the objective of the government and the judiciary is to have the best people as judges who must be chosen with complete transparency and objectivity and there must be broad based consultations. “Just as judges have enormous stake in the appointment of judicial officers in the higher judiciary (Supreme Court and the 24 High Courts), the government has an equal stake. Since both of us have stakes in the appointment of members of the higher judiciary, the consultation of both of them is absolutely necessary. Government must have a say,” he emphasised.

fantastic!:hysterical: but if they go forward, then I would like to see a rep from the main opposition also appointed to the committee, not just the ruling "government". :hehe:

[yoda]

Good move. Judges appointing themselves sounds bogus. On the other hand, the US system of executive + legislative appointing judges also puts a partisan spin on the judicial composition. A commission with members from both the judiciary and the executive seems better than either one of them doing it alone.