Remote Mindset

[FischerTal]

there's a reason for that - he's friggn guilty. I have seen the working of Govt. administration from up close and I can say this with 100% certainty that there is no way riots of that scale could have happened and the CM couldn't have known. Besides' date= Modi isn't the usual CM - he likes to control every single thing in his state so to think that he just didn't know/had nothing to do with the riots is laughable. The Cong was directly involved in the 1984 riots but no major leader has been brought to justice till date - the same may happen in Modi's case but that does not mean he's not guilty or that the media should stay silent or that the Cong shouldn't use its influence to make the media cover this story in greater detail.

the horns are coming out now. :clap:

[Sachin=GOD]

the horns are coming out now. :clap:

if COng thinks that he is guilty and they have media resources then why shouldn't they use them :dontknow: Modi is also using all possible mainstream and social media channels to portray himself as a saint so..

[FischerTal]

if COng thinks that he is guilty and they have media resources then why shouldn't they use them :dontknow: Modi is also using all possible mainstream and social media channels to portray himself as a saint so..

then why blame Modi for PR image building? isnt that hypocritical if you justify COng using media to bring him down? :dontknow:

[someone]

Another thread derailed by Sachin=God. :facepalm: And reading your recent posts, you are looking as sick as there is too much obsession of him for one particular person. The point is very simple of this article, how Gandhi faces no questions, and they have their paid gang groups to defend them whenever anything shows up. As leaders of the nation, any Indian can demand at least knowing their personal views, their own opinions but there is none of them. They are most protected "assets" in India and a whole lot of spinning doctors work with them.

[someone]

The inside story of how Sonia’s spin doctoring works

If ever proof were needed that Sonia Gandhi’s relationship with her government is about plausible deniability on the unpopular things associated with the latter, you can do this check. Just put “Sonia unhappy” on Google and you will have an entire list of things she is said to be unhappy about: about corruption, about efforts to defang the RTI Act, about the poor implementation of MGNREGA, about governors who act in a partisan manner to help her party. Even the recent exits of Pawan Bansal and Ashwani Kumar from the railway ministry and law ministry respectively came after unconfirmed reports talked about “Sonia’s unhappiness” with their conduct (over alleged corruption in railway jobs and attempts to doctor the CBI report on Coalgate respectively). There is a good chance that these stories were really the result of Sonia Gandhi’s spin doctors going to work overtime rather than anything real. For the real Sonia Gandhi has almost never voiced these opinions to the media or even in public fora. Those who dislike Sonia Gandhi have never been in any doubt that certain parts of the media bend over backwards to make news out of the spin doled out by her political secretary Ahmad Patel and others supposedly close to her. If you don’t believe this, you could do worse than to read Sandeep Bhushan’s article in Open magazine, about how the Sonia-spin system works. Bhushan, who worked for what seems like a Sonia-friendly TV news channel, got his first taste of spin-doctoring when covering the Congress party in 2005. At that time, Syed Sibte Razi was Jharkhand Governor, and as Sonia’s “hand-picked” incumbent, his job was to install a Congress-friendly government headed by Shibu Soren by hook or by crook. Sibte Razi gave Soren, who clearly lacked the numbers, 20 days to prove his majority, and even the Supreme Court frowned on this partiality by forcing an earlier confidence vote. Suddenly, instead of focusing on Sibte Razi’s biased actions, some TV channels suddenly changed tune and, as Bhushan writes, “word went around that Sonia Gandhi was ‘unhappy’ with the Jharkhand Governor.” Bhushan’s editor told him the focus was not Sibte Razi but Sonia’s “unhappiness”. Bhushan rues: “I was left with little choice. Sonia had not issued a statement. Yet the story had irrevocably changed. The next morning, even the print media was full of the same spin.” The question is simple: why do senior editors change their obvious story lines to kowtow to the first family? Bhushan is clear that there is a linkage between editors at the top and the Congress spin doctors. But these linkages are difficult to prove and not restricted to the top bosses alone. They extend to beat reporters as well. To be sure, this is a well-established rule in all spin doctoring, whether political or corporate. Every businessman knows that it is not enough to merely schmooze with the editorial boss. The beat reporter also has to be wined and dined. Editors may come and go, but beat reporters carry their biases from one newspaper or channel to another till the end of their careers. But this is not about outright corruption, but about favoured access and status. For the beat reporter, the offer of an exclusive with the CEO or an owner or somebody powerful is big; in politics, this opens up visions of special scoops from powerful people or even special appearances at your family occasions. It can do wonders to your status. Says Bhushan: “Stories impacting Sonia’s image are carefully choreographed right at the top, at the level of promoters and editors who are on first-name terms with key Congress functionaries such as Ahmed Patel. But Patel, the consummate spin doctor, also has a line with beat reporters; they need each other in the demanding 24×7 news cycle where a single ‘untutored’ line could damage the Congress President’s image.” So why does a beat reporter toe the line? Answer: for psychic benefits. “If you work for a friendly channel and scrupulously adhere to the rules of the game, he (Ahmad Patel, or some other Congress worthy) could spring a surprise or two by gracing your marriage celebrations – not alone but with Congress Vice-President Rahul Gandhi. Recently, to the utter surprise of journalist colleagues, both made an appearance at the marriage celebrations of a ‘lowly’ Congress beat reporter, whose stock was sent soaring among his network bosses.” Well, now you know how you should read stories about Sonia’s alleged unhappiness. Here are some links to stories where Sonia, at a convenient time, became “unhappy” with someone or something. When Sonia Gandhi wants to appear on both sides of a Hindu-Muslim or communal issue, Digvijaya Singh will cut loose at one end, and Sonia will privately express her displeasure over it. Her party may be in the dock over firings in which minority members were killed, but she will merely express unhappiness covertly about it.

[adi B]

why bring modi`s name and derail a thread not related to him :headshake: congress party is a sh1thole and will indulge in the worst kind of petty politics and perfidy peoples trust gloryfying such instances :facepalm:

[someone]

Even today, I saw some news channels talking about "Sonia orders", "Sonia demands". Is there anything ever concrete about them? Not a single interview out there and yet, we only get to hear those above stuffs in that poor manner. Same thing with Congress members, they run to defend them whenever something arises about them, never seen this person themselves rising up for the questions..

[zumi]

Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi, infact the whole Gandhi parivar (except Vadra, who is smart) are well trained monkeys used smartly by elite congress ministers to rob India. Sonia and Rahul Gandhi haven't even got an iota of IQ to even understand how to boil an egg, these two monkeys are probably on par with another lucky idiot, north korea's Kim Jong-un.

[someone]

How The Indian Media Supporting Congress Party! Share This & let everyone know about the Alliance of Indian Media & Congressss Party Please read thissssss..... "1. Hindustan Times – Shobhna Bhartia, owner and editor-in-chief of Hindustan Times is a Congress MP from Rajya Sabha. 2. Vinod Sharma, HT Political Affairs editor, is essentially a Congress spokesman on all TV panel discussions, because once his boss’ term gets over, he will be looking out for her RS seat next 3. Barkha Dutt and Vir Sanghvi, famous Congress stooges (and intermediaries for UPA allies) who were exposed in the Radiagate scandal, and are virtual Congress spokespersons in their capacities as electronic media personalities, are the ones who write opinion and op-ed columns most frequently (once every week) on the editorial pages of HT. In return, Barkha and Sanghvi are rewarded with Padma Shris and other monetary compensation by the Nehru dynasty or Congress party. 4. NDTV’s promoters are Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy. Radhika’s sister Brinda Karat is a famous CPM leader (well known for anti-Baba Ramdev views) and Brinda’s husband Prakash Karat is the CPM Politburo General Secretary (well known for preferring Congress over BJP). And Prannoy Roy’s first cousin is the famous far-leftist pro-Maoist-Naxalite pro-Kashmiri-terrorists “intellectual” Arundhati Suzanna Roy. 5. NDTV’s Barkha Dutt’s reality has already been exposed by me in above section. 6. NDTV’s Sonia Singh is the wife of Uttar Pradesh Congress MP, Union minister and ex-princely state ruler, Mr. R. P. N. Singh, who is one of the fastest rising stars in the Congress party. If you remember, Sonia Singh is a very high-profile anchor on NDTV whose pro-Congress anti-BJP bias is legendary. 7. NDTV’s Nidhi Razdan (high-profile anchor of Left Right Centre) is the current girlfriend of J&K CM Omar Abdullah (after Omar recently divorced his wife of several years and mother of his two children, Payal). Nidhi Razdan is also famous for her legendary pro-Congress and anti-BJP bias. 8. CNN-IBN : Rajdeep Sardesai’s wife and co-promoter of CNN-IBN, Sagarika Ghose, who anchors Face the Nation and is famous journalist of CNN-IBN (well, her hubby is the owner-editor-in-chief after all) are famous Congress stooges. 9. Sagarika’s father Bhaskar Ghose was a famous sarkari babu and was made the chief of Prasar Bharati (Doordarshan) during Indira and Rajiv regimes. Bhaskar Ghose was well-known for personal loyalty to the Nehru dynasty, and now his daughter and son-in-law are rewarded with their own channel to do Congress propaganda. 10. In fact Sagarika’s extended family even consists of her aunts Ruma Pal (former Supreme Court justice and a close friend of the Nehru family) and Arundhati Ghose (former diplomat and Indian ambassador to various countries, predictably, under Congress regimes). 11. Let’s now come to another famous CNN-IBN media personality who also writes columns frequently for Hindustan Times — Karan Thapar. What you may not know is that the Nehru family itself is related, through blood and marriages, to the high-profile Thapar family. India’s Army chief during the 1962 debacle against China, Gen. P. N. Thapar, is brother-in-law of Nayantara Sehgal, the daughter of Vijaylakshmi Pandit and niece of Jawaharlal Nehru. Gen. Thapar’s son is pro-Congress journalist Karan Thapar. Gen. Thapar’s sister is Romila Thapar, a famous “top” typical JNU Nehruvian communist ideologue historian, who gets to write our textbooks and pollute them with pro-Congress Marxist propaganda. 12. The HIndu – The Worst – N. Ram, owner and editor-in-chief (till February 2012) of The Hindu, was once a vice president of the Students Federation of India. SFI is the students’ wing of the CPM. 13. P. Sainath of the The Hindu (acclaimed journalist well known for his, again, unsurprisingly, typical left-wing Nehruvian communism ideology), is the nephew of Congress politician V. Shankar Giri and the grandson of V. V. Giri, ex-President of India and famous Congress politician. Giri was especially known to be one of the first few staunch loyalists of Indira, and whom Indira fielded for President elections against her own party’s Neelam Sanjeeva Reddy, and who ultimately became the cause of the first high-profile split in the Indian National Congress into Congress (O) and Congress (I) — almost all the pre-independence regional stalwarts split away to join Congress (O) or form their own state parties, and the rest including Giri (all the loyalists of the Nehru family staying on with Indira). 14. Or even what about little known News24 Hindi media channel? Owned by ex-journalist and editor Rajiv Shukla, famous Congress MP in Rajya Sabha, Union minister, industrialist, BCCI vice president and IPL chairman. 15. Or even what about little known Lokmat (and IBN Lokmat) that is Marathi newspaper (and channel) in Maharashtra? Owner and editors-in-chief are the brothers Vijay Darda (Congress MP) and Rajendra Darda (Congress MLA in Maharashtra, and minister in state govt). 16. Or even the other bigger and smaller media houses, such as The Times of India and Indian Express, where the Nehru dynasty has managed to infiltrate its loyalists such as Dileep Padgaonkar and Shekhar Gupta, who are essentially paid stooges of the Congress party. 17 Vinod Mehta - Outlook editor has been well known to take anti BJP stand The Congress (in fact just the one single family — the Nehru dynasty) has been in power for 56 of the last 65 years of independence. This matters a LOT. Personal relationships have been built, blackmail-worthy secrets have been spied, monumental wealth has been accumulated … all by the one single Nehru dynasty (and its family-business-cum-political-party aka Congress) that helps it maintain its tight irongrip over not just the entire Indian mainstream media, but also deep into our bureaucracy, our governmental institutions, and even our journalism and mass media colleges and grad schools. We have probably not even scratched the surface of the network of family and personal relationships through which the Nehru dynasty has completely dominated and controlled the entire intellectual, historian and journalist landscape of India. And we haven’t even talked about the monumental wealth or the blackmailing secrets. All because the one single dynasty got to rule over India for 60 years uninterrupted. It matters a LOT. The typical JNU Nehruvian communist left-libbers ideologues have really perpetrated some kind of stranglehold on India’s journalism, media and intellectual space. Almost all opposition (or even centre-right ideologues) journalists have been slowly thrown out of their jobs due to pressure from the Congress and the Nehru family. Even the great venerable Ramnath Goenka, frustrated and broken by repeated I-T raids and ED investigations ultimately had to fire Arun Shourie twice from the Indian Express, which was once the best Indian newspaper in the 1970s and 80s. That was the team — Goenka the owner, Shourie the editor, and S. Gurumurthy the fearless journalist, that brought political heavyweights like Indira Gandhi down on her knees and even took on corporate honchos like Dhirubhai Ambani. (Ramnath Goenka inspired the Mithun Chakraborty character and S. Gurumurthy inspired the R. Madhavan character in the Ambani biopic “Guru”.) But very few centre-right ideologues are left in India’s media space today, that too in minor publications like The Pioneer. Almost all the mainstream media houses have been thoroughly infiltrated and coerced into towing the Congress’ line, sometimes just through ideology and relationships, and not even money power. The Congress party essentially owns and controls every single mainstream media house in India, including Hindustan Times, The Times of India, NDTV, CNN-IBN, The Hindu, Tehelka, Outlook, etc"

[adi B]

agree with most of them except maybe a couple,for example p sainath might be an anti bjp but he`s far from a congress chamcha add kumar ketkar on the list ,he`s an epitome of anti bjp..sharad pradhan is a rare good journo from UP