fineleg Posted June 16, 2013 Posted June 16, 2013 Is Butler going to get penalized for claiming that dismissal? He would have known it hit his gloves and only then stumps yet claimed it to be out. Over 17.3 Bopara to Williamson
indiaregulator Posted June 16, 2013 Posted June 16, 2013 I ****ing hope so, Bairstow is better. On a serious note, it's a completely different situation and you know it. Ramdin celebrated like he knew he caught it, Buttler was nonchalant about it and simply wanted the umpires for a review. he didn't even celebrate.
Crookbond Posted June 16, 2013 Posted June 16, 2013 He should be punished as it was a clear transgression.
indiaregulator Posted June 16, 2013 Posted June 16, 2013 So everytime a wicketkeeper claims for run-out when the batsman crossed the line should be banned right Dexter? ****ing logic man.
fineleg Posted June 16, 2013 Author Posted June 16, 2013 He can claim it's fro stumping. ECB-ICC will try these loopholes. They always let the Eng Aus players get away! He was appealing for a bowled dismissal of Williamson.
bulbul Posted June 16, 2013 Posted June 16, 2013 ECB-ICC will try these loopholes. They always let the Eng Aus players get away! He was appealing for a bowled dismissal of Williamson. I don't know , but this is not as straight forward as Ramdin's case.
Crookbond Posted June 16, 2013 Posted June 16, 2013 So everytime a wicketkeeper claims for run-out when the batsman crossed the line should be banned right Dexter? ****ing logic man. Two straw man's in one post - now that's new! 1. He wasn't appealing for a stumping, Williamson had both his feet inside the crease, he appealed to the umpire at the bowler's end and not the leg umpire. Nasser Hussain on air, "I think England are asking for a bowled. It's no where near a stumping - he's a yard in." 2. I said he should be penalized not banned. There's no way Jos Butler wouldn't know that it didn't hit his gloves first.
indiaregulator Posted June 16, 2013 Posted June 16, 2013 So then what's Buttler, functionally retarded? he clearly asked for the umpire review as he didn't wildly celebrate. if he knew he wouldn't have wasted everyone's time. if he knew why would be bother asking for umpire review when he knew what the result was going to be.
Crookbond Posted June 16, 2013 Posted June 16, 2013 So then what's Buttler, functionally retarded? he clearly asked for the umpire review as he didn't wildly celebrate. if he knew he wouldn't have wasted everyone's time. if he knew why would be bother asking for umpire review when he knew what the result was going to be. Just like Matt Prior, eh? Same argument can be made for Ramdin as well. He claimed Williamson was OUT - the umpire asked for a review. Take it up on the chin; as we speak Broad bowls a NO ball and the 3rd umpire is blind enough not to see it.
indiaregulator Posted June 16, 2013 Posted June 16, 2013 Ramdin was hoping that the Umpire's wouldn't make the review and he would be immediately given out. Butler immediately ran to the umpire. Different situation.
Crookbond Posted June 16, 2013 Posted June 16, 2013 Ramdin appealed and so did Butler - same situation. IDK we had psychics in this world like Charles Xavier who can read what players are thinking.
indiaregulator Posted June 16, 2013 Posted June 16, 2013 Just watch the reactions of Ramdin and then Buttler and then you will immediately see the difference. It's pretty damned obvious in fairness. Ramdin chucked the ball in the air and went apeshit and buttler said nothing, raised his arms and asked the umpire.
CSK Fan Posted June 16, 2013 Posted June 16, 2013 No way a wicket keeper wouldn't know whether it hit his gloves before hitting the stumps
Crookbond Posted June 16, 2013 Posted June 16, 2013 Just watch the reactions of Ramdin and then Buttler and then you will immediately see the difference. It's pretty damned obvious in fairness. Ramdin chucked the ball in the air and went apeshit and buttler said nothing, raised his arms and asked the umpire. Let me call out another BS. Watch the video and tell me where he chucked it in the air. He under arms it to the leg umpire. On the other hand, Butler is arm raising and pointing towards the stumps. Even Hussain and Atherton on air said that Butler should know if it hit his gloves before the stumps. Atherton also mentioned about the bails falling ahead rather than behind. cnO45rmaDZQ
indiaregulator Posted June 16, 2013 Posted June 16, 2013 semantics. he ****ing runs around high fiving everyone for god sakes and smiling and laughing and cheering. keep grasping at your straws and cry at the so called 'injustice' when nobody else in the world cares about Buttler.
FischerTal Posted June 16, 2013 Posted June 16, 2013 fricking ECB act like upright purists of the game, but no more corrupt than Seeni Mamu and his henchmen
saneindian Posted June 16, 2013 Posted June 16, 2013 semantics. he ****ing runs around high fiving everyone for god sakes and smiling and laughing and cheering. keep grasping at your straws and cry at the so called 'injustice' when nobody else in the world cares about Buttler. 5 posts from you full of profanities in the thread ..so looks like it does matter to some people
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now