Jump to content

ICF National Rankings


vipin

Recommended Posts

Posted
it says ODI/List A :dontknow:
For List A :agree: I can't export the response list since it basic package in survey monkey.Need to pay for using other features :(( Will post a screenshot later :nice:
Posted
For List A :agree: I can't export the response list since it basic package in survey monkey.Need to pay for using other features :(( Will post a screenshot later :nice:
:two_thumbs_up:
Posted
List career avg of 56.97 almost 57 :dontknow:
So? How many ODIs? He might go on to be very good but as of now I don't see how he can be better than guys like Yuvi and Gambhir. Possibly the Che love showing again.
Posted
So? How many ODIs? He might go on to be very good but as of now I don't see how he can be better than guys like Yuvi and Gambhir. Possibly the Che love showing again.
lol can you not read? it says ODI/List A :cantstop:
Posted
So player with good List A record is better than player with good ODI record? :hatsoff:
it is not about one being better than other. both are mentioned. :two_thumbs_up: PS: If you want to make it about one over the other and compare List A averages, you'll see who is better :good: Che 56+ Dhoni 50+ Kohli 49+
Posted
it is not about one being better than other. both are mentioned. :two_thumbs_up: PS: If you want to make it about one over the other and compare List A averages, you'll see who is better :good: Che 56+ Dhoni 50+ Kohli 49+
Che at 7, Yuvi and Gambo below that. How is that not about one being better than other?
Posted
Che at 7' date=' Yuvi and Gambo below that. How is that not about one being better than other?[/quote'] so what do you suggest? he should be at the bottom of the list :headshake:
Posted
so what do you suggest? he should be at the bottom of the list :headshake:
At least much below than guys like Yuvi and Gambhir. Bottom would be ideal TILL he doesn't make his debut.
Posted
At least much below than guys like Yuvi and Gambhir. Bottom would be ideal TILL he doesn't make his debut.
lol then whats the point of including List A if a guy who averages over 56+ has to be at the bottom of the list?
Posted
lol then whats the point of including List A if a guy who averages over 56+ has to be at the bottom of the list?
If not absolutely bottom, then at least in bottom 3. Top priority is ODI and not List A.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...