shortbread Posted January 2, 2014 Posted January 2, 2014 Truth. These guys cant seem to accept that. We beat India home and away. There is no argument to present against that. :two_thumbs_up: Yes theres an argument, is 3 tour games not enough?! Is not spending 3 months in a country playing against the same opposition not enough?! I mean you guys could spend the whole 2014 in Aus and still not win a game?!!
alexander Posted January 2, 2014 Posted January 2, 2014 3-0 is now 'just scraping to a narrow win'. :cantstop: Your W/L ratio is the 2nd worse in test cricket from the main 8 teams. Only the Kiwis have worse then your 0.80. :finger: All those FTBs didnt win much for you, did they?
special K Posted January 2, 2014 Author Posted January 2, 2014 Yes the last time the pom win loss ratio and pom pundits predicted them to whitewash the Aussies at home, look what happened, oh wait look at whats still happening LOL!!! Dont forget you just scraped through to narrowly win against the Aussies at home, thanks to the weather!! This new Indian side, THRASHED the Aussies at home. Englands trundlers will have no replies against the likes of Dhawan, Vijay, Kohli, Pujara and Rahane. Rest assured be prepared for even more pommie mental breakdowns, resignations, suicides et all..... No, If the weather stayed at worst we still win the ashes 3-2. The bad light screwed us out of winning 4-0 You guys will be whitewashed by New Zealand and then by us. The only chance you're got of winning a test is if we let you bat for three innings.
special K Posted January 2, 2014 Author Posted January 2, 2014 Yes theres an argument, is 3 tour games not enough?! Is not spending 3 months in a country playing against the same opposition not enough?! I mean you guys could spend the whole 2014 in Aus and still not win a game?!! We didn't lose our tour games though. Unlike India. They also didn't have MJ bowling to them in those tour games you know.
special K Posted January 2, 2014 Author Posted January 2, 2014 We beat England home and away before that.. You caught us when we go through transition and when you were at your peak after like two decades? :cantstop: We are still in the middle of transition. As per your own commies and experts England was supposed to rule the world for next decade or so as other teams have lost lot of players. Let us see how you rule the world :cantstop: We were going through transition in 2007. It should have been 1-1 that series, if Monty wasn't screwed out of the most blatant LBW when you were 9 down at Lords and then the bad light saved you.
vvvslaxman Posted January 2, 2014 Posted January 2, 2014 We were going through transition in 2007. It should have been 1-1 that series' date=' if Monty wasn't screwed out of the most blatant LBW when you were 9 down at Lords and then the bad light saved you.[/quote'] Excuses Excuses.. :cantstop: How many times Indian batsmen got the rough justice on that tour so much so Simon Taufe had to make an apology in the press :cantstop:
shortbread Posted January 2, 2014 Posted January 2, 2014 The bad light screwed us out of winning 4-0 Oooohh theres plenty of light in Australia...What happened?!:haha: You guys will be whitewashed by New Zealand and then by us. We won the last time in NZ, even with our elderly statesmen players!!! What happened when u lot toured NZ, oh wait you did not win a single game and even lost against a club side!!:haha: The only chance you're got of winning a test is if we let you bat for three innings. Why do you want the Indian batsmen to bat for the poms as well. Ooohh cmon cant be that bad. You still have Pietersen, hes a Saffer but at least you still have one decent batsman left!!
alexander Posted January 2, 2014 Posted January 2, 2014 SK, These guys seem to think cricket started in 2000. As if all before that didnt happen. We who grew up decades ago recall India as a truly joke team. Yes, the Aussies were good, the West Indians were good, the Pakistanis were good - and the South Africans were good before being banned - and good again after 1991/2. But India was always easy wins - and at home, that has not changed. A few decent years by their standards and now act like the the best in the world.
special K Posted January 2, 2014 Author Posted January 2, 2014 NZ has a much better attack now. When's the last time India won a series in Australia?
panther Posted January 2, 2014 Posted January 2, 2014 India only win in England should have been 1-1 panesar had some batsman plumb with only 1 wicket left back in 2007.
vvvslaxman Posted January 2, 2014 Posted January 2, 2014 SK, These guys seem to think cricket started in 2000. As if all before that didnt happen. We who grew up decades ago recall India as a truly joke team. Yes, the Aussies were good, the West Indians were good, the Pakistanis were good - and the South Africans were good before being banned - and good again after 1991/2. But India was always easy wins - and at home, that has not changed. A few decent years by their standards and now act like the the best in the world. Yea.. i distinctly remember India canned England to oblivion in England 2-0 in 1986 series.
vvvslaxman Posted January 2, 2014 Posted January 2, 2014 NZ has a much better attack now. When's the last time India won a series in Australia? They are world no.6th ranked test side. You couldn't beat them in your very best. What does that tell you. You are just a home track bully. We beat them home and away against NZ. This is the NZ team that could not buy a win in Bangladesh.
vvvslaxman Posted January 2, 2014 Posted January 2, 2014 What about all the other series? :D Well in 1970s we won a series as well :cantstop: Remember chandras 6 for 38
vvvslaxman Posted January 2, 2014 Posted January 2, 2014 Australia has bragging rights, SA has bragging rights. Not England. They were reduced into mere spectators in 1992/93 series whitewash against Kumble.
special K Posted January 2, 2014 Author Posted January 2, 2014 They are world no.6th ranked test side. You couldn't beat them in your very best. What does that tell you. You are just a home track bully. We beat them home and away against NZ. This is the NZ team that could not buy a win in Bangladesh. We're a home track bully and we beat you at your home. What does that tell you about you.:yay:
shortbread Posted January 2, 2014 Posted January 2, 2014 We who grew up decades ago recall India as a truly joke team. We who grew up....really, Did you?!! Do you remember the decades england were absolutely crap and were Australia's whipping boys (much like now)?! Forgot that, or is it that you weren't fully grown back then?! Maybe the Yes' date=' the Aussies were good, the West Indians were good, the Pakistanis were good - and the South Africans were good before being banned - and good again after 1991/2.[/quote'] So you agree england were never good!! Atleast we agree on something
special K Posted January 2, 2014 Author Posted January 2, 2014 Australia has bragging rights' date=' SA has bragging rights. Not England. They were reduced into mere spectators in 1992/93 series whitewash against Kumble.[/quote'] We were beaten 3-0 in that series, Aus were beaten 4-0. So in what way does Aus have bragging rights and we don't? Aus has a worse record in India then we do btw.
shortbread Posted January 2, 2014 Posted January 2, 2014 We're a home track bully and we beat you at your home. What does that tell you about you.:yay: Since you are challenged to answer the question let me help you. Tells me that you lot are overrated and crap, and when you beat us at home we had a very poor batting line up!!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now