Haarkarjeetgaye Posted May 19, 2014 Posted May 19, 2014 They were going to teach a lesson to BJP. I hope they learnt some
Roshanrocks Posted May 21, 2014 Author Posted May 21, 2014 AFter elections!!!!!!! 1. Kejri apologizes for resigning from Delhi... 2. AAP party peepal want Kejri to re-form govt in Delhi with Kangress support, Kangress refuse... 3. BJP fires first arrow onto Kejri --->Nitin Gadkari gets Kejri arrested, Kejri refuses to pay bail... WIlll relax in Tihar jail till 23rd May... Ashutosh gets angry, very angry... To be continued...
Roshanrocks Posted May 21, 2014 Author Posted May 21, 2014 Twitter attack Both pro and anti AAP fire salvos at easch other... few samples...' Bahadur @my2bit 8m So when #Kejriwal takes out a list of "corrupt" politicians its not political but his arrest is. Bittu Sharma @KapilLaughs 48s Arvind Kejriwal is ready to pay Rs.85000 as rent to retain Govt. house but not Rs.10000 to avoid arrest. Now again 'Sab mile hue hai'. Pratik Prasenjit @pratikprasenjit 10m SC is an Ambani agent MT @mehranzaidi M than 1 yr to arrest Subrata Roy for refusing to to pay 20,000cr & a day to arrest Kejriwal? Syed.M.Z.Raheman @Raheodisha 1h "@tweetfromRaghu: Shocked at Arvind kejriwal's arrest. Jailed for calling gadkari corrupt. Amit shah, etc not prosecuted for hate speeches?" @AsuraVeera @AsuraVeera 1h If BJP supporters believe that Kejriwal's arrest is all publicity drama, why don't they withdraw the case? #kejriwalarrested Rushed Kludge @_high_five 1h Congress/BJP always make wild allegations about each other. But when @ArvindKejriwal does, they file defamation case. #Kejriwalarrest
coffee_rules Posted May 21, 2014 Posted May 21, 2014 How can one make allegations and not show proof when asked? Dumbo
Roshanrocks Posted May 21, 2014 Author Posted May 21, 2014 Section 144 imposed outside Tihar Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Arvind Kejriwal was sent to Tihar jail on Wednesday after a Delhi court ordered him to be taken into judicial custody as the former Delhi chief minister refused to furnish bail bond in a criminal defamation complaint filed against him by BJP leader Nitin Gadkari. There was commotion outside Tihar jail in the evening as AAP activists staged a protest forcing the authorities to impose Section 144 outside the central prison. Several AAP workers, including senior party leader Yogendra Yadav, were detained by police following the clash. As the AAP supporters started gathering outside the jail to protest against the court's decision, police started evicting them and Section 144, which prohibits mass gatherings, was also imposed outside the jail. AAP leaders Rakhi Birla, Manish Sisodia and Sanjay Singh were also present outside the jail to lead the party's supporters. "If it is a crime to call a corrupt person corrupt, then send us to jail or hang us. This is dictatorship," said Singh. Yadav slammed the police's move to evict them saying, "We are not doing anything illegal. Those who are indulging in corruption... are sitting in their drawing rooms and enjoying while those opposing corruption are being sent to jail. What kind of justice is this? "This is police high-handedness. There should be women police to deal with women protesters," he said. Earlier in the day, the Patiala House court ordered Kejriwal to be take in to judicial custody. "Take him into custody," Metropolitan Magistrate Gomati Manocha ordered after the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader and former Delhi chief minister repeatedly refused to furnish a personal bail bond of Rs 10,000 and a surety of like amount. "In these circumstances as the accused has refused to furnish bail bond or even personal bond without surety, this court is constrained to take the accused into custody. "Let the accused be sent to judicial custody and be produced before the court on May 23," the magistrate said. Kejriwal was summoned as an accused by the court in the defamation complaint in which Gadkari had alleged that he was defamed by the AAP leader, who had included his name in the party's list of "India's most corrupt" The magistrate, in her three-page order, also observed that the procedure of courts cannot be "thrown to the winds" at the whims and fancies of the litigants. "The court cannot act as a mute spectator when a particular litigant intentionally seeks to violate the procedure established by law. "This case cannot be dealt with any differently than any other criminal cases where the courts insist on furnishing bail bond/personal bond to secure the presence of the accused persons. "The accused in the present case cannot seek differential treatment to be let off only on an oral undertaking in violation/divergence to the settled practice/procedure regarding bail," the court said. The court, in its order, also said that this was not a case where the accused is unable to furnish bail bond due to financial inability. "The accused is just adamant to not furnish bail bond or even a personal bond for his appearance before the court," it said.
Roshanrocks Posted May 21, 2014 Author Posted May 21, 2014 FAQ What is bail? In adult court, bail is money that some criminal defendants have to deposit to guarantee that they will return to court if released from jail while their cases are pending. The money is returned after the case is fi nished. However, if the defendant is convicted, a percentage of the money will be deducted. 2. How do u get ur bail money back? If the defendant has made court appearances as required, cash bail should be returned at the end of the case.
Recommended Posts