vvvslaxman Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 1990 wimbledon junior singles final.. tell me who win this without googling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zep1706 Posted July 6, 2014 Author Share Posted July 6, 2014 Did you see that Volley.. even 2 year kid would have made that :cantstop: Djokovic has terrible volleys, always been so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bones Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 Its okay guys. Fedex will win in 4 sets. This was a fluke win by CHOKOVICH No fluke in winning that set, in fact he should be up 2-0, he's better better today, marginally, but better so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zep1706 Posted July 6, 2014 Author Share Posted July 6, 2014 1990 wimbledon junior singles final.. tell me who win this without googling. Leander Paes? :nervous: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sachin=GOD Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 1990 wimbledon junior singles final.. tell me who win this without googling. Paes :hmmm: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vvvslaxman Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 Leander Paes? :nervous: yup Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vvvslaxman Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 Leander Paes defeated South Africa Marcos Ondruska 7–5, 2–6, 6–4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zep1706 Posted July 6, 2014 Author Share Posted July 6, 2014 yup He should have been able to do better on grass. This surface was tailor made for him. I know that Sampras did not give anyone a chance (except once) but Leander should have gone deeper than he did. His serve was not strong enough. I haven't seen Edberg, but of all the players I have seen since 1997, Leander is probably the best volleyer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vvvslaxman Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 One player lost one of the wimbledon final without losing even a single game . Tell me who that is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vvvslaxman Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 He should have been able to do better on grass. This surface was tailor made for him. I know that Sampras did not give anyone a chance but Leander should have gone deeper than he did. His serve was not strong enough. I haven't seen Edberg' date=' but of all the players I have seen since 1997, Leander is probably the best volleyer.[/quote'] Edberg was the boss of serve and volley. Very smooth, artistic player. In the early 1990s. Right about the time Power Tennis took over. Guys like Jim Courier made the game unwatchable with power hitting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sachin=GOD Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 One player lost one of the wimbledon final without losing even a single game . Tell me who that is. Ivanisevic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zep1706 Posted July 6, 2014 Author Share Posted July 6, 2014 It's getting darker, hope it does not rain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vvvslaxman Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 Ivanisevic? sorry one correction.. It was semi final. my bad. He beat two of the coaches today to win the wimbledon. semi and final . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SLICKR392 Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 It's getting darker' date=' hope it does not rain.[/quote'] What happens if its washed out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zep1706 Posted July 6, 2014 Author Share Posted July 6, 2014 What happens if its washed out? They have a roof. :haha: Follow the roof here https://twitter.com/WimbledonRoof Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vvvslaxman Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 Edberg broke his serve once. Stich did not break even one of his serve. Yet Stich won 4-6,7-6,7-6,7-6 1991 wimbledpn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sachin=GOD Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 sorry one correction.. It was semi final. my bad. Edit.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akshayxyz Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 Federer's best chance is 4 sets. Djoker is marginally better, just enough and Federer is 10-15% below his best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vvvslaxman Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 Not much drama. It is like watching one of those Lords Test match lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akshayxyz Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 Federer needs to break once. No way Djoker is going to let go next tie breaker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now