Clueless & Spineless - 2 words to describe this team

[The Outsider]

If it was a T-20 or even a 50 over LOI' date=' I can see chance being an explanation. One guy, one inning, one wicket can turn it quickly. But you have to do a lot of things right to win a test match. If you can do it all one time, you can't lose the ability in a matter of weeks.[/quote'] Long term success is defined on a repeatable set of actions in a given framework. Ishant Sharma bowling bouncers and English batsmen playing to script does not strike me as one. On the other hand things going wrong with wrong actions is the underlying image of the team I gather from a sporadic following of it through highlights (watch rate of 50%), cricinfo (limited to occasional glances at the score and historic articles), and ICF (threads where OP or last poster are something I am inclined to read, in this case you). So, my perspective of Indian cricket is very narrow and it is very possible I am wrong.

[AmreekanDesi]

What makes me angrier is that this is a very weak England team with several members having played only a handful of tests. But still they hammered us. The 2011 team was a legit world class outfit so being humiliated by them was atleast somewhat understandable...