bulbul Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 First post 2.55 pm: Supreme Court rejects Srinivasan and BCCI's options According to Times Now, The Supreme Court has rejected all of the options put forward by the BCCI and Srinivasan. The court has said it has to be an independent body that decides on the punishment for CSK and Meiyappan. It can't be any body related to the BCCI. Link to comment
bulbul Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 The court also had said that BCCI elections should go ahead, but directed that all board members who are under investigation to keep away. Then, it asked the Indian board if there was any provision in its constitution to debar Srinivasan from contesting the BCCI polls in future. IBNlive Link to comment
asterix Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 The way Srini is fighting with SC... Imagine how dangerous the guy is.... I hope he gets banned by SC and Velu's ban gets revoked by ICF... Else no funz... Link to comment
Crookbond Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 Plot twist - Srinivasan is velu on ICF Link to comment
diga Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 Inderjit Bindra @inderjitbindra · 23h 23 hours ago 1/5 PURCHASE OF CHENNAI SUPER KINGS was the mother of all conflicts. 2/5 In Goa mtng 2008 I had proposed that anti-corruption should be handed over to ICC. Srini vehemently opposed-obvious conflict of interest 3/5 PURCHASE OF FLINTOFF BY CHENNAI SUPER KINGS-complete details on Lalit Modi's blog 4/5 Despite clear cut decision to put ALL PLAYERS IN THE POOL FOR RE-AUCTION AFTER 3 YEARS, he had his way on RETENTION OF PLAYERS 5/5 SAHARA CONTRACT FOR TEAM INDIA WAS FOR 3.3 Crores/match. After Sahara's withdrawal Srini signed a contract with STAR with 30% reduction 5a/5 He also signed a contract with STAR for sponsoring CSK for 10 Cr/season--an obvious conflict of interest resulting in loss to d Board Link to comment
Malcolm Merlyn Posted December 9, 2014 Author Share Posted December 9, 2014 I hope Srini is banned forever. Link to comment
Precambrian Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 Supreme Court is grovelling. It is pontificating and trying to score points but ultimately it knows it's sreeni 1- SC 0. Maama nu summa va Link to comment
yoda Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 First the SC gives BCCI options, then it says can't accept the options when the BCCI comes back with same SC options + 1 extra. Not sure what's going on. Link to comment
asterix Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 I think SC is just dilly dallying... I mean another investigation panel of retired judges... Just pronounce a judgment and move on to other cases... No wonder you get so much of case backlogs... Link to comment
bulbul Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 I think SC is just dilly dallying... I mean another investigation panel of retired judges... Just pronounce a judgment and move on to other cases... No wonder you get so much of case backlogs... Agree..look like their favorite player is in this mess, so they are just dragging. Link to comment
Crookbond Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 I think SC is just dilly dallying... I mean another investigation panel of retired judges... Just pronounce a judgment and move on to other cases... No wonder you get so much of case backlogs... Trust me, SC is just being cautious. The thing with the BCCI is that it will find many loopholes and the SC is keeping its cards close to the chest. From a legal perspective, SC is just doing a fantastic job! Link to comment
bulbul Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 CCI president-in-exile N Srinivasan on Wednesday told the Supreme Court that if he is re-elected to the cricket body, he would stay away from IPL governing council till a proposed committee decides on the question of conflict of interest involving him and his IPL franchisee Chennai Super Kings. Srinivasan in an undertaking to the apex court also said that he will completely dissociate from IPL till a mechanism on conflict of interest is evolved http://ibnlive.in.com/news/cricketnext/will-stay-away-from-ipl-meetings-if-allowed-to-contest-bcci-elections-srinivasan-to-sc/517406-78.html :haha: :haha: Link to comment
bulbul Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 According to Times Now, the BCCI's lawyers have cited case law showing why it is necessary to preserve their autonomy. It is okay with a Supreme court-appointed probe panel but the panel must follow BCCI rules. The BCCI's lawyers have finished making their arguments. The Cricket Association of Bihar's lawyers will not get a chance to make their case Link to comment
bulbul Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 1.10 pm: Gurunath Meiyappan did not bet from the venue, says India Cements :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical: Link to comment
asterix Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical: :wall: Link to comment
bulbul Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 :wall: more 1:40 pm: Gurunath was betting in his personal capacity, claims India Cements Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now