Texan Posted December 17, 2014 Posted December 17, 2014 So, now for Pakistan - Taliban = Bad But Hafiz Saeed, Dawood Ibrahim = still good #doublestandards
Debutant Posted December 18, 2014 Posted December 18, 2014 This is exactly why I never have any sympathy for this shithole country. They deserve each and everything they are getting.
jonas10 Posted December 18, 2014 Posted December 18, 2014 What a shithole country indeed. Here we are like idiots giving prayers and tribulations to them and the next ***in day they are talking about attacking us.
Debutant Posted December 18, 2014 Posted December 18, 2014 Reactions from Indians and Modi were way over the top.
scorpio90 Posted December 18, 2014 Posted December 18, 2014 For our bleeding hearts: 26/11 Accused Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi Gets Bail in Pakistan A Pakistani court has granted bail to Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi, accused of planning the 26/11 attacks in Mumbai in which 166 people were killed six years ago,for lack of evidence Lakhvi, a senior commander of the terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba, has been in a prison in Rawalpindi. This is how Pakistan fights terrorism.
CommonMan Posted December 18, 2014 Posted December 18, 2014 How much more innocent kids should die for these loosers to realize that guys like him are the real culprits?
Debutant Posted December 18, 2014 Posted December 18, 2014 Aur tweet karo #IndiaWith*****istan :whack::whack:
bones Posted December 18, 2014 Posted December 18, 2014 People should get worked about up about this because this guy is one of the leading politicians in the country? Grow a brain ffs. It's a circus clown spewing out rubbish, nothing to get so worked up about.
riya Posted December 18, 2014 Posted December 18, 2014 Well..he has to..Because people in Pak right now are extremely angry that they hate every terrorist the good and the bad.Though he comes under the category of 'good'',not a good time for the good ones either..Hence the atttention diversion tactics..
scorpio90 Posted December 18, 2014 Posted December 18, 2014 But then our previous gov has not exactly covered itself with laurels in 26/11 case. When the Indian state itself is not willing to take the fight to the terrorists and their backers, other countries will point out our shoddy work to make a case for Pakistan. 11,000-page 26/11 Mumbai attack chargesheet had one para on LeT: Book http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/11000-page-26/11-Mumbai-attack-chargesheet-had-one-para-on-LeT-Book/articleshow/39503322.cms The chargesheet in the 26/11 Mumbai attack case that ran into over 11,000 pages had just one paragraph on Lashkar-e-Taiba, the terror organization behind the attacks and scant reference to ISI. According to a book set to be published shortly, the chargesheet also left several other lacunae that thoroughly disappointed many, including Chikako Taya, a former Japanese judge who was on the International Criminal Tribunal for former Yugoslavia (ICTY). Justice Taya studied the Mumbai attack case as part of an effort to see if it can be covered under 'joint criminal enterprise' (JCE), to prosecute those in Pakistan who orchestrated the terror strike under an international tribunal. "(With its flimsy chargesheet) The prosecution relieved the real criminals behind the actual crime. The name of ISI does not figure in the chargesheet and consequentially the name did not figure in the judgment. As it is said, the LeT is also scantily defined in the chargesheet. The terror organization did not draw much indictment from the court," the book says. According to 'Fragile Frontiers: The Secret History of Mumbai Terror Attacks', by Saroj Kumar Rath, when Justice Taya visited the 26/11 attack special public prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam in Mumbai, she was surprised to see that the lawyer in India's most important terrorism case had no clue of JCE, a concept that had been innovatively applied by ICTY recently. "Why was the LeT not adequately dealt in the chargesheet, asked Justice Taya? Nikam answered that 'it has adequately been dealt in the chargesheet'. Justice Taya protested and said only one paragraph in the entire chargesheet was devoted to LeT. Nikam explained that as a criminal lawyer he was well versed in criminal proceeding of the case. As he was out of the investigation team, he did not have much information and the union home ministry might have more information, which would satisfy the quest of his visitor," the book says. The book goes on to raise several questions over the way the investigations into the 26/11 attacks was handled, and the very shallow chargesheet filed in the case. "The entire 11,280-page chargesheet basically dealt with the loss of lives and property in the aftermath of Mumbai attacks. The entire chargesheet is a compilation of the post mortem report of 166 persons, oral testimony of 2,202 persons, detail of loss of property, ballistic evidence of blasts and firing, and details about the materials carried by the terrorist to the attacks sites," the book says. When Justice Taya met Nikam, the book says: "Justice Taya started asking question after question on the role of the ISI, the Pakistan army and the LeT in Mumbai attack. All questions were either deflected or answered in the negative by Nikam. On the question of the LeT and the ISI, Nikam admitted his limitation and asked how he could investigate a matter which came under the jurisdiction of Pakistan." The book is also highly critical of the voluminous judgment delivered in the case, pointing out that it was a compilation of "lofty words and hyperbole, which lacks substance and true wisdom." But to a great extent the blame, the book says, is with the poor evidence presented and weak prosecution.
adi B Posted December 19, 2014 Posted December 19, 2014 People should get worked about up about this because this guy is one of the leading politicians in the country? Grow a brain ffs. It's a circus clown spewing out rubbish, nothing to get so worked up about. And killing indians,giving hate speeches and propagandist of jihad, so yeah nothing for us to worry about :nice:
Recommended Posts