Guest dada_rocks Posted December 3, 2007 Posted December 3, 2007 CC too asked this question umpteeneth time:hysterical:.. What is sthg.. ( sthg : i.e. something)
maggot_brain Posted December 3, 2007 Posted December 3, 2007 CC too asked this question umpteeneth time:hysterical:.. What is sthg.. ( sthg : i.e. something) I've already explained why I am not CC, short of posting a scan of my passport and losing all anonymity there is no way I can disprove you.
Guest dada_rocks Posted December 3, 2007 Posted December 3, 2007 Cos I did a search for all post by you to see if my assumption about you being a right-winger was correct. Obviously it is. As for the CC accusal. I do not even have Indian citizenship' date=' I am British subject. CC also mentioned that both of his parents' families were from Bangladesh originally. My father is from Kolkata, whereas my mother is from the UK. And please don't reply in Hindi, I do not understand it.[/quote'] :hysterical: So in thousands of posts u plucked those posts.. Who does that..
maggot_brain Posted December 3, 2007 Posted December 3, 2007 :hysterical: So in thousands of posts u plucked those posts.. Who does that.. Me, obviously. I also did a search on Islam and saw CC arguing with some guy from Bangladesh. What happened to CC, was he banned? Do people believe CC to be bongosamaj?
Guest dada_rocks Posted December 3, 2007 Posted December 3, 2007 I too have bought that till u came up with new revelations.. Anyway benefit of doubt goes to you.. A suggestion if u are not CC then go ahead post ur hearts out but if u are and are trying to hide identity then post less frequently that way facade will last longer..
Guest dada_rocks Posted December 3, 2007 Posted December 3, 2007 I agree they should give a level playing field' date=' I just hate the BJP. You should give the same rights to your enemy that you enjoy too.[/quote'] Enemy where did this word come from we are taking about election not war-zone. Here parties differ in views they ain;t enemies baying for each other's blood. So u do accept level -playing field is necessary and hence ur first post in this thread was brainless rant. :two_thumbs_up:
maggot_brain Posted December 3, 2007 Posted December 3, 2007 I too have bought that till u came up with new revelations.. Anyway benefit of doubt goes to you.. A suggestion if u are not CC then go ahead post but ur hearts out if u are and are tryign to hide identity then post less frequently that way facade will last longer.. What, so people now think I am CC and not bongosamaj? If I was that much of an idiot why would I help you? I am confused, anyway I am not CC, end of story. If I'm not mistaken CC also supports Musharraf. I don't. The reason I did a search was when this whole CC nonsense started was cos I wanted to see what had happened and why people would think I was him. There are similarities between us but some things are completely different.
Guest dada_rocks Posted December 3, 2007 Posted December 3, 2007 Me' date=' obviously. I also did a search on Islam and saw CC arguing with some guy from Bangladesh. What happened to CC, was he banned? Do people believe CC to be bongosamaj?[/quote'] Who knows and who cares
Guest dada_rocks Posted December 3, 2007 Posted December 3, 2007 Forget CC issue; that will come up if and when new data comes to the fore.. peace kapish
maggot_brain Posted December 3, 2007 Posted December 3, 2007 Enemy where did this word come from we are taking about election not war-zone. Here parties differ in views they ain;t enemies baying for each other's blood. So u do accept level -playing field is necessary and hence ur first post in this thread was brainless rant. :two_thumbs_up: Political enemies not actual ones. The first post was bascially cos I'm not going to shed any tears over the BJP's problems. Didn't kumble_rocks point out though that it is difficult to legislate a private TV station? I don't know what the laws are in India so you'll have to enlighten me.
Guest dada_rocks Posted December 3, 2007 Posted December 3, 2007 Nothing is difficult all it needs is one piece of legislation.. If it can be done in usa/canada it can be done anywhere else.. The first post was bascially cos I'm not going to shed any tears over the BJP's problems This is what I call communazi talk.. Don't crib when table is turned, it's matter of time BTW..
kumble_rocks Posted December 3, 2007 Posted December 3, 2007 Nothing is difficult all it needs is one piece of legislation.. If it can be done in usa/canada it can be done anywhere else.. So , what makes you think that Fox news has equal proportion ads for right wingers as well as leftists. So do you seriously think that Obama/Hillary gets the same billing as Romney/Guliani ? I still maintain , can't legislate private channels on what ads they put. Same with other news feeds like newspapers.
maggot_brain Posted December 3, 2007 Posted December 3, 2007 So ' date=' what makes you think that Fox news has equal proportion ads for right wingers as well as leftists. So do you seriously think that Obama/Hillary gets the same billing as Romney/Guliani ? I still maintain , can't legislate private channels on what ads they put. Same with other news feeds like newspapers.[/quote'] Thanks! This is basically what I am getting at.
Guest dada_rocks Posted December 3, 2007 Posted December 3, 2007 So ' date=' what makes you think that Fox news has equal proportion ads for right wingers as well as leftists. So do you seriously think that Obama/Hillary gets the same billing as Romney/Guliani ? I still maintain , can't legislate private channels on what ads they put. Same with other news feeds like newspapers.[/quote'] Point is this, FOX news can't say no to the advertisement request of obama/hilary. Dems do not approch those channels. Their reporters media pundits will talk about republican no doubt but even they show dems advertisements. Talk show hosts have their personal opinion I am fine with that wud have liked objectivity even there but unfortunately can't curb one's fundamnetal right of opinion. In contrast I am yet to find even a signle advertisement of BJP on cnn-ibn. I am not asking Rajdeep Sardesai to become sane all of a sudden he can remain happy loony. All i am asking why black out BJPs advertisement.. I am not willing to buy that BJP didn't approach this channel with their advertisement.
kumble_rocks Posted December 3, 2007 Posted December 3, 2007 Point is this, FOX news can't say no to the advertisement request of obama/hilary. Dems do not approch those channels. Their reporters media pundits will talk about republican no doubt but even they show dems advertisements. Talk show hosts have their personal opinion I am fine with that wud have liked objectivity even there but unfortunately can't curb one's fundamnetal right of opinion. In contrast I am yet to find even a signle advertisement of BJP on cnn-ibn. I am not asking Rajdeep Sardesai to become sane all of a sudden he can remain happy loony. All i am asking why black out BJPs advertisement.. I am not willing to buy that BJP didn't approach this channel with their advertisement. See the positive side . At least CNN-IBN does not run negative ad against BJP unlike Foxnews which routinely runs anti-hilllary/Obama ads supported by Mccain/Gulian/Romney i etc
Guest dada_rocks Posted December 3, 2007 Posted December 3, 2007 See the positive side . At least CNN-IBN does not run negative ad against BJP unlike Foxnews which routinely runs anti-hilllary/Obama ads supported by Mccain/Gulian/Romney i etc Are you kidding me non-stop negative ad is on,, other than that congress ad.. Forget about the big-shots of the channel every 2-bit reporter seems to have been given clear directive. Just go click on anything that has to do with BJP/MODI and gujrata election it has negative propaganda written all over it.
THX_1138 Posted December 4, 2007 Posted December 4, 2007 I am witnessing non-stop congress ad on ibn-live without a trace of BJP ad. Can't belive MOdi could not muster resources to place his ad on this channel. SO only reason could be this pinko channle won't entertain Modi. Now the question is don't we have moral code of conduct for media houses for giving equal amount of air-time to all the parties involved in election. I guess sthg to this effect is in place in north america at least We need this legislation asap otherwise party in power and people with jaundiced views will keep misusing their media power.. well why must anyone suffer that fool narendra modi, except maybe a prison cell; and no there is no such regulation on the media here, or anywhere that claims to be, and is indeed a democracy. a state regulated media would result in an election like the ones that just concluded in russia. i.e. a big middle finger to the rest of the world. and parties can purchase air time on channels just like advertisers. there is however, editorial discretion of what the channel might want to air. hence, NAMBLA cant air its ads on CNN even if it forked out the required sum for the air time.
THX_1138 Posted December 4, 2007 Posted December 4, 2007 Are you kidding me non-stop negative ad is on,, other than that congress ad.. Forget about the big-shots of the channel every 2-bit reporter seems to have been given clear directive. Just go click on anything that has to do with BJP/MODI and gujrata election it has negative propaganda written all over it. use your remote, change the channel.
Guest dada_rocks Posted December 4, 2007 Posted December 4, 2007 When I talk on some issue it's never just about me, just a clarification . Whence channel changing is not going to help..
Cricketics Posted December 4, 2007 Posted December 4, 2007 I am witnessing non-stop congress ad on ibn-live without a trace of BJP ad. Can't belive MOdi could not muster resources to place his ad on this channel. SO only reason could be this pinko channle won't entertain Modi. Now the question is don't we have moral code of conduct for media houses for giving equal amount of air-time to all the parties involved in election. I guess sthg to this effect is in place in north america at least We need this legislation asap otherwise party in power and people with jaundiced views will keep misusing their media power.. do u really think these add really make any impact on ppl?? i m not sure really.. the bjpz would continue to support bjpz.. and the congressmenz would continue to support congress regardless of whateve cr@p stuff done under one's party
Recommended Posts