Cook's dismissal!

[Dhoni's English]

Did anyone see this joke of a decision? It pitched on (or just outside) leg stump and was going further down leg. Don't you just love some umpires?:cry_smile::sad_smile:

[varun]

Who was the umpire again ?

[bharat297]

Yea I saw it ... absolute rubbish decision.

[Holysmoke]

need tech

[Dravid]

KP got fcked too..

[apocalypse]

here are highlights GOesfnNWyOY

[Chaos]

wtf, is this is umpiring. Pieterson was ot out and so is cook. When sanga was plumb they didnt give it. SL are fckin big cheaters.

[Deleted_User_1]

Who was the umpire again ?

Daryl Harper

[Cricketics]

are we havin cricket or what.. bloody damn it... poor umpiring is an insult to this game.... i mean look @ this.. daryl harper and aleem dar are discusin about giving kp out or not.. why not just bloody forward the decision to the third umpire..

[Dhoni's English]

are we havin cricket or what.. bloody damn it... poor umpiring is an insult to this game.... i mean look @ this.. daryl harper and aleem dar are discusin about giving kp out or not.. why not just bloody forward the decision to the third umpire..

Innit. They're making a mockery of the sport we all love.:confused_smile:

[sm332]

what we need is for Oz and Poms to lose some big series due to poor decisions ... you will see change on the quick when that happens ...

[Dhoni's English]

Thanks for those highlights Apocalype.:two_thumbs_up:

[MundaPakistani]

are we havin cricket or what.. bloody damn it... poor umpiring is an insult to this game.... i mean look @ this.. daryl harper and aleem dar are discusin about giving kp out or not.. why not just bloody forward the decision to the third umpire..

it would have still been debatable. In such situations it is better to trust the fielders. p.s i watched ICL matches today and apparently they are using technology for the LBWs and other border line decisions. Now admittedly i have only watched 2 out of the 11 or 12 games but from what i saw the umpiring was well below par.

[Cricketics]

it would have still been debatable. In such situations it is better to trust the fielders. .

in the video replay u can easily figure out that ball had a connection with the ground

[MundaPakistani]

in the video replay u can easily figure out that ball had a connection with the ground

very hard to say for sure but if it had been referred then the benefit of the doubt would have gone to the batsman(which isn't right either)

[Chaos]

very hard to say for sure but if it had been referred then the benefit of the doubt would have gone to the batsman(which isn't right either)

dont back that shiity umpire gan distan

[Cricketics]

very hard to say for sure but if it had been referred then the benefit of the doubt would have gone to the batsman(which isn't right either)

isn't right?? mate here u can see ball touching the ground and u feel benifit of doubt shoudn't have gone to the batsman?? actually the benifit rule shoudn't have been applied anyway.. as the ball can be clearly seen touching the ground..

[Dhoni's English]

very hard to say for sure but if it had been referred then the benefit of the doubt would have gone to the batsman(which isn't right either)

Oh come on man. The replay clearly shows that after catching the ball, the fielder goes down and the ball is shown coming into contact with the ground. 3rd umpires' decision would have been OUT!

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --