Guest BossBhai Posted December 12, 2007 Posted December 12, 2007 -- Removed on request of the user --
fineleg Posted December 12, 2007 Posted December 12, 2007 71.2 Harbhajan Singh to Misbah-ul-Haq, no run, round the wicket again and that's beaten, goes away from the batsman, bit of extra bounce and there's a huge appeal for caught behind, Karthik not too sure about it, though, and umpire Koertzen says not out They showed replays of this and it was definitely out. :angry_smile: Ah, the vagaries of the game and umpiring errors, they make the game so interesting. It all evens out in the long run. :angry_smile: RUDY KOERTZEN!!! Feel like kicking him :angry_smile:
Guest BossBhai Posted December 12, 2007 Posted December 12, 2007 -- Removed on request of the user --
Sachinism Posted December 12, 2007 Posted December 12, 2007 great performance by india's bowlers im sure we got atleast 35 wickets
The Outsider Posted August 6, 2010 Author Posted August 6, 2010 Bump. For those who think Sydney '08 was a one off! :D
Chorazin Reto Posted August 6, 2010 Posted August 6, 2010 I've been watching the England vs Pakistan Test and the review system has been working alright, might have helped in this game lol.
thevortex Posted August 7, 2010 Posted August 7, 2010 Sydney '08 was most definitely a one-off! There was nothing before, nothing after on that scale.
The Outsider Posted August 8, 2010 Author Posted August 8, 2010 I disagree totally on one count. Umpiring decisions can never terminate/adversely affect a player's career. We havent had ONE player, past or current, come out and say that poor umpiring cost him dearly in his career. Zulqarnain Haider would have been dismissed for a king pair on debut and most likely have been consigned to history books forever today, but for the referral system. Currently batting on 73, the highest score by a Pakistani on this tour and has got a fair chance of making a career for himself thanks to technology and Hawk Eye.
thevortex Posted August 9, 2010 Posted August 9, 2010 Zulqarnain Haider would have been dismissed for a king pair on debut and most likely have been consigned to history books forever today' date=' but for the referral system. Currently batting on 73, the highest score by a Pakistani on this tour and has got a fair chance of making a career for himself thanks to technology and Hawk Eye.[/quote'] Can you walk us through this miracle performed by Hawkeye, Outsider?
thevortex Posted August 9, 2010 Posted August 9, 2010 On another note, I just read that Umar Akmal was given out after a review which showed the ball clipping the bails! Not sure what the sequence of events was. But if Hawkeye - which is basically a stump magnet for the cricket ball - shows the ball clipping the bails, there is a lot of probability that it was going above.
Sachinism Posted August 9, 2010 Posted August 9, 2010 Can you walk us through this miracle performed by Hawkeye' date=' Outsider?[/quote'] Knowing what PCB are like, how many more chances would he have been given after a king pair?
thevortex Posted August 9, 2010 Posted August 9, 2010 Knowing what PCB are like' date=' how many more chances would he have been given after a king pair?[/quote'] Cant say, Sachinism. Zulqarnain looked very good with the big gloves so far as I saw. And they need a change behind the wickets for sure.
The Outsider Posted August 9, 2010 Author Posted August 9, 2010 Cant say' date=' Sachinism. Zulqarnain looked very good with the big gloves so far as I saw. And they need a change behind the wickets for sure.[/quote'] Is that why Sarfraz Ahmed was dropped immediately after the Hobart test, not just from the team but from the squad as well?
thevortex Posted August 10, 2010 Posted August 10, 2010 Is that why Sarfraz Ahmed was dropped immediately after the Hobart test' date=' not just from the team but from the squad as well?[/quote'] Are you really saying - with impunity - that you can predict how the Pakistani selection panel functions? For my part - I am saying no, I am a mere mortal. Their workings are way beyond me :). Seriously though, Zulqarnain would not have been dropped like a hot coal after just this one game. He did well behind the wicket and in general added a bit of zip and zest to the team as opposed to the glum faced Kamran Akmal. At the very least he would have got another game.
saneindian Posted August 10, 2010 Posted August 10, 2010 Was watching highlights of Dada's debut 100 at Lord's. There was a loud shout for LBW on the very first ball Dada faced which was not given by the umpire. The ball from Dominic Cork pitched on off stump and curved into Ganguly, hitting him below the knee roll and missed the bat by a mile (whereas dada lifted his bat to let the umpire(Darrel Hair) know that he had hit it. That was a plumb LBW, the ball would have taken the middle stump out. With the UDRS in use, one of the all time fairy tale debuts would never have happened!!
thevortex Posted August 10, 2010 Posted August 10, 2010 Now, thats another perspective :). Good one, saneindian.
Sachinism Posted August 10, 2010 Posted August 10, 2010 Ask an England fan about that, most wouldn't care about the fairy tale, they'll tell you he should have been back in the hut
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now