Temujin Khaghan Posted June 24, 2015 Posted June 24, 2015 joe root is a better all-round batsman and therefore a more useful player than williamson
BlueBee Posted June 24, 2015 Posted June 24, 2015 Both are equally good batsmen but Root is more valuable since he can bowl a bit too and a very good slip catcher. IMO.
f.b.m Posted June 24, 2015 Posted June 24, 2015 Both are equally good batsmen but Root is more valuable since he can bowl a bit too and a very good slip catcher. IMO. Same with Williamson.
BlueBee Posted June 24, 2015 Posted June 24, 2015 Same with Williamson. Root is a better LOI bat and part time bowler, IMO.
India-KXIP fan Posted June 24, 2015 Posted June 24, 2015 1. Smith 2. ABDV 3. Kohli 4. Sangakarra 5. Williamson 6. Root 7. Amla 8. Clarke 9. Warner Talent wise for younger players, potential ATG's: 1. Kohli 2. Smith 3. Williamson 4. Root All 4 can become ATG's. Are expected to become G's at the very least. None seems to have GOAT potential (SRT) though.
Old guy Posted June 24, 2015 Posted June 24, 2015 1. Smith 2. ABDV 3. Kohli 4. Sangakarra 5. Williamson 6. Root 7. Amla 8. Clarke 9. Warner Talent wise for younger players, potential ATG's: 1. Kohli 2. Smith 3. Williamson 4. Root All 4 can become ATG's. Are expected to become G's at the very least. None seems to have GOAT potential (SRT) though. no rahane ?
adi B Posted June 24, 2015 Posted June 24, 2015 Both are same for me ,bowling style is same also lol but kane has proven himself in SC conditions,gotta wait for root to prove his caliber
renjith Posted June 24, 2015 Posted June 24, 2015 pure batting skill wise williamson looks the best amoung williamson, root, kohli and smith.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now