Pagalpanti Posted July 29, 2015 Posted July 29, 2015 Well....very and yuvi didn't even have 8500 runs. If we're going to count them in the could have been list' date=' then there are at least 10 players who scored more career runs than them but didn't hit the 10k mark.[/quote'] Yuvi stopped playing after 2011 WC, 4 years - 2000 runs is easy for a player of his calibre. Sehwag probably yeah was never going to reach the mark.
Gollum Posted July 29, 2015 Posted July 29, 2015 Very under rated player, was one of the chief architects behind Lanka's great runs in ICC events. Kudos :hatsoff: Also a brilliant fielder :two_thumbs_up:
HippoSucks Posted July 29, 2015 Posted July 29, 2015 Sachin is an obviously better opener' date=' Amla may be, but we have to wait till he finishes. I feel Dilshan as an opener is better than Jaya, especially on harder bouncier wickets, because of his ability with cross bat shots. Unlike Greenidge or Haynes, Dilshan is a superb player of spin, better than many in that list, except Sachin and Saurav. Third best opener, hmm, I will not drop that claim easily.[/quote'] Why does the ability to play a particular bowling style make a difference here? Apart from Sachin, the others (Greenidge, Ganguly, Anwar, Jayasuriya, Hayden, Gilchrist, Waugh, Kirsten and Haynes) are better ODI openers than Dilshan (some argument can be made for him over someone like Jayasuriya but that's about it). So you think Gilchrist isn't a better opener than Dilshan?
thongale Posted July 30, 2015 Posted July 30, 2015 Why does the ability to play a particular bowling style make a difference here? It's because openers play more pace than spin. Simple logic. Having said that Dilshan is no slouch in playing spin too. Gives advantage over Haynes and Greenidge. Apart from Sachin, the others (Greenidge, Ganguly, Anwar, Jayasuriya, Hayden, Gilchrist, Waugh, Kirsten and Haynes) are better ODI openers than Dilshan (some argument can be made for him over someone like Jayasuriya but that's about it). Ganguly over Jayasuriya is a hilarious comparison. :hysterical:. After Sachin, it's some one like Jayasuriya or Gilly take the openers slot due to their superb second and third disciplines and quick scoring. Ganguly has neither qualities, and woefully slow compared to openers of his day (SR in mid 70s?). So was the case with Hayden. Dilshan on other hand has a superb average, and scores quick too. He has second, third and fourth disciplines to add in to a team (ATG fielder, servicable offspinner, and reserve keeper). None of the openers other than Jayasuriya and Gilly has above qualities, not even Sachin. Because of this he is a valuable player top open the innings.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now