MechEng Posted February 9, 2016 Posted February 9, 2016 Blewett was certainly not a top players. Most of the others were decent but hardly great batsman (except Tugga Waugh).He did score a superb 214 against Donald and Pollock giving Australia an innings win. You don't have to consistently trouble great batsmen to be called a great bowler, Mcgrath was an exception to this.
express bowling Posted February 9, 2016 Posted February 9, 2016 Who the heck is this Blewett?http://www.espncricinfo.com/India/content/player/4161.html moniker 1
Vijy Posted February 9, 2016 Author Posted February 9, 2016 He did score a superb 214 against Donald and Pollock giving Australia an innings win. You don't have to consistently trouble great batsmen to be called a great bowler, Mcgrath was an exception to this.One good innings doesn't make a player good. Azhar Mahmood (from Pak) started his career with a bang and scored some great 100s in the beginning, but he was quite ordinary on the whole. Same goes for Blewett. The day Blewett starts to be called a good/great player is when Ishant will become a great fast bowler
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now