Rajiv Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 ..and how teams get away These 2 Decisions cost India only 145 runs. its OK folks, its only happened for the 100th time So this 376 should have technically been 231/7 03JmZ_Gsa1A 6sBToU9f5FQ Link to comment
maggot_brain Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 ..and how teams get away These 2 Decisions cost India only 145 runs. its OK folks, its only happened for the 100th time So this 376 should have technically been 231/7 03JmZ_Gsa1A 6sBToU9f5FQ If I remember correctly that nick off IS was when australia were on 190-odd. So we could have potentially got them out for 250. I doubt that a Lee-Hogg partnership would have been as effective as Symonds-Hogg was. Link to comment
Rajiv Posted January 2, 2008 Author Share Posted January 2, 2008 Moreso, I would have been on TOP of SuperSelector, all above me have Symonds Cheaters :cantstop: Link to comment
Guest Hiten. Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 mattt post kar yaaar....it hurts :( PS: btw check ur pm on DT :P Link to comment
Ram Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 Rajeev, as much as i really appreciate you putting up your videos, i simply couldnt understand one thing These 2 Decisions cost India only 145 runs. its OK folks, its only happened for the 100th time So this 376 should have technically been 231/7 If you really meant this, then i would like to ask you, what kind of simplistic math is this ? This isnt some trigonometric problem, for you to make allowances with numbers. This is real life cricket, anything can happen here. Link to comment
Guest Hiten. Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 no bade rude ho tum :(( Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
Donny Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 Just hitting the pad is not enough, Bossby. Link to comment
Guest dada_rocks Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 Man I am sick to the stomach, wy even play just hand them the tophy Link to comment
Anakin Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 Just hitting the pad is not enough' date=' Bossby.[/quote']wow, thanks for enlightening us, and of course it seems just hitting the bat is not enough for catch too. Link to comment
Rajiv Posted January 2, 2008 Author Share Posted January 2, 2008 Rajeev, as much as i really appreciate you putting up your videos, i simply couldnt understand one thing If you really meant this, then i would like to ask you, what kind of simplistic math is this ? This isnt some trigonometric problem, for you to make allowances with numbers. This is real life cricket, anything can happen here. You don't need to go that far, I am offering grade 1 math Link to comment
Anakin Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 Rajeev, as much as i really appreciate you putting up your videos, i simply couldnt understand one thing If you really meant this, then i would like to ask you, what kind of simplistic math is this ? This isnt some trigonometric problem, for you to make allowances with numbers. This is real life cricket, anything can happen here. Yes, OZs could've been bundled under 200 runs as well. Link to comment
veer Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 this is BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUULLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL..... Link to comment
Dooks Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 The stumping even I could see he was OUT after the first viewing - never mind x number of replays the 3rd umpire had. This is a simple case of official CHEATING & in Bucknor's case - he doesn't like India - end of story. Bucknor should never be near a cricket field & especially when India are playing. :(( Link to comment
Ram Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 Even the mistakes made by the two on-field umpires are explainable, but how on earth did the 3rd umpire give that Symmonds stumping as not out ? He had access to everything the on-field umpires didnt have - Slo-mo replays, different angles and yet he made a mistake. The umpires in this match are like a Golf Handicap handed to Aus, or starting a 100 m race with the Aus, with them already 40 m ahead of you. Link to comment
Guest dada_rocks Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 Third umpire haraami ke pass kya excuse tha Link to comment
Guest Hiten. Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 Third umpire haraami ke pass kya excuse tha he didn't have HDTV :hysterical: Link to comment
Guest dada_rocks Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 Still people say Syms played well freaking after million lives anyone wud play well.. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now