Jump to content

Video: The Blunders of this game


Rajiv

Recommended Posts

Posted

..and how teams get away These 2 Decisions cost India only 145 runs. its OK folks, its only happened for the 100th time So this 376 should have technically been 231/7

03JmZ_Gsa1A 6sBToU9f5FQ

Posted
..and how teams get away These 2 Decisions cost India only 145 runs. its OK folks, its only happened for the 100th time So this 376 should have technically been 231/7

03JmZ_Gsa1A 6sBToU9f5FQ

If I remember correctly that nick off IS was when australia were on 190-odd. So we could have potentially got them out for 250. I doubt that a Lee-Hogg partnership would have been as effective as Symonds-Hogg was.
Guest Hiten.
Posted

mattt post kar yaaar....it hurts :( PS: btw check ur pm on DT :P

Posted

Rajeev, as much as i really appreciate you putting up your videos, i simply couldnt understand one thing

These 2 Decisions cost India only 145 runs. its OK folks, its only happened for the 100th time So this 376 should have technically been 231/7
If you really meant this, then i would like to ask you, what kind of simplistic math is this ? This isnt some trigonometric problem, for you to make allowances with numbers. This is real life cricket, anything can happen here.
Guest BossBhai
Posted

-- Removed on request of the user --

Guest dada_rocks
Posted

Man I am sick to the stomach, wy even play just hand them the tophy

Posted
Just hitting the pad is not enough' date=' Bossby.[/quote']wow, thanks for enlightening us, and of course it seems just hitting the bat is not enough for catch too.
Posted
Rajeev, as much as i really appreciate you putting up your videos, i simply couldnt understand one thing If you really meant this, then i would like to ask you, what kind of simplistic math is this ? This isnt some trigonometric problem, for you to make allowances with numbers. This is real life cricket, anything can happen here.
You don't need to go that far, I am offering grade 1 math
Posted
Rajeev, as much as i really appreciate you putting up your videos, i simply couldnt understand one thing If you really meant this, then i would like to ask you, what kind of simplistic math is this ? This isnt some trigonometric problem, for you to make allowances with numbers. This is real life cricket, anything can happen here.
Yes, OZs could've been bundled under 200 runs as well.
Posted

The stumping even I could see he was OUT after the first viewing - never mind x number of replays the 3rd umpire had. This is a simple case of official CHEATING & in Bucknor's case - he doesn't like India - end of story. Bucknor should never be near a cricket field & especially when India are playing. :((

Posted

Even the mistakes made by the two on-field umpires are explainable, but how on earth did the 3rd umpire give that Symmonds stumping as not out ? He had access to everything the on-field umpires didnt have - Slo-mo replays, different angles and yet he made a mistake. The umpires in this match are like a Golf Handicap handed to Aus, or starting a 100 m race with the Aus, with them already 40 m ahead of you.

Guest dada_rocks
Posted

Third umpire haraami ke pass kya excuse tha

Guest Hiten.
Posted
Third umpire haraami ke pass kya excuse tha
he didn't have HDTV :hysterical:
Guest dada_rocks
Posted

Still people say Syms played well freaking after million lives anyone wud play well..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...