gakgupta Posted August 10, 2016 Posted August 10, 2016 Look at LYON.....He looked so potent and better than sub-continent spinners in Australia and england....but he looked poor in sub-continent ..... Also, bowlers like zaheer looked better than say broad in sub-continent conditions but he didn't do as good as expected in non subcontinent .... Little baffled by this theory Sent from my XT1068 using Tapatalk
tweaker Posted August 10, 2016 Posted August 10, 2016 It is same as our spin bowler bowl overseas,& their pacer's bowl in subcontinent. It may be more about adjusting to different conditions also,as well as adjusting to different balls used ...sg,kookabura etc
gattaca Posted August 10, 2016 Posted August 10, 2016 Adjusting length is the key. It's difficult for any foreign bowler to do that. Except if you are warne, McGrath.
thongale Posted August 11, 2016 Posted August 11, 2016 //adjusting to different balls used ...sg,kookabura etc Good observation. Murali was easily dealt by Indians bowling with SG. But when he got the Kookaburra on his hand, on SL wickets (which are pretty similar to Indians ones) he flattened Indian batsmen. Kumble and Harbhajan was all over SL batsmen in India with SG. But they were reduced to mediocre on SL wickets with the Kookaburra. If one country was more spin friendly than other, the above could not be obserevd. On the other hand against Pakistan. SL and Pakistani spin bowlers have very similar stats home and away, because both countries use Kookaburra. Ankit_sharma03 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now