After Donald's runout in 1999 wc, this one will be remembered the most

[Cricketics]

Posting and sharing this as I heard the game was not televised in India.

 

Stoinis had almost clinched his team to victory from no where with incredible century. 

 

But then 7 runs were needed and Williamson set up a brilliant field and Hazlewood was ready for a single thinking Stoinis would like to keep the strike and he was found short.

 

There was no run

 

[BCCI]

I knew it all along only way they could lose was a run  out and they managed it without fail.I mean he could have played a maiden next over and won .And who told Stoinis that Hazlewood is Chris Martin with bat.

[Cricketics]

Just now, BCCI said:

I knew it all along only way they could lose was a run  out and they managed it without fail.I mean he could have played a maiden next over and won .And who told Stoinis that Hazlewood is Chris Martin with bat.

Still, hazelwood came out from no where. He should have kept his bat in the crease as Williamson was standing right next to him.

 

 

[BCCI]

30 minutes ago, Cricketics said:

Still, hazelwood came out from no where. He should have kept his bat in the crease as Williamson was standing right next to him.

 

 

Both Hazlewood and Starc did not use their brains.NZ were rattled,could have done it easily.

[Cricketics]

27 minutes ago, MultiB48 said:

hazelwood panicked ,should have had more confidence in his batting

More than panic, it was the pressure moment getting the better of him. He knew he had to give strike to Stoinis and hence was ready for single, but under pressure he made a blunder of forgetting the fielder and seeing his partner. 

[Cricketics]

4 minutes ago, MultiB48 said:

couldn't he bat out 1 over ,he didnt even had to score any runs, there was plenty of time ,then next over stoinis could have finished it,should have stayed in his crease but once he came out it was always going to be tough for him

Yes, and that is why I said pressure. But another thing is thst with the way sixes were being hit by Stoinis, Stoinis must have told to look for a single whenever there is a single as if Stoinis had batted any other way other than attacking, they could have lost. But that was the difference, knowing when to take the single. If there is no single, them you can't try to make one with just one wicket in hand. Clearly there was no single.