Gollum Posted December 17, 2017 Share Posted December 17, 2017 6 hours ago, Vijy said: the same (underachieving) couldbe said of dravid who avg 50 in the 90s as well - he avgd 49.96 which is basically 50. he was avg 58+ at the end of WI series in 2006. another big underachiever. btw, more than 3 batsmen avgd > 50 in the 90s even if one imposes a 1000 run cutoff in that decade. I can think of atleast gooch, tendu, lara and waugh. Yup Gooch averaged in the 50s in the 90s. He was mediocre in the 80s and that pulled his average down, very under rated bat. But I don't put him alongside SRT, Lara, Waugh because he played only for 3-4 years in that decade while the former 3 played the full decade. Link to comment
Rasgulla Posted December 17, 2017 Share Posted December 17, 2017 Lol SRT what a he was... Kohli Link to comment
King Tendulkar Posted December 17, 2017 Share Posted December 17, 2017 1 hour ago, Rasgulla said: Lol SRT what a he was... Kohli Shock ! Rasgulla posts something slating tendulkar looool Link to comment
Rasgulla Posted December 17, 2017 Share Posted December 17, 2017 3 hours ago, King Tendulkar said: Shock ! Rasgulla posts something slating tendulkar looool Shock! King Tendulkar full of double standards King Tendulkar 1 Link to comment
Vijy Posted December 17, 2017 Share Posted December 17, 2017 10 hours ago, Gollum said: Yup Gooch averaged in the 50s in the 90s. He was mediocre in the 80s and that pulled his average down, very under rated bat. But I don't put him alongside SRT, Lara, Waugh because he played only for 3-4 years in that decade while the former 3 played the full decade. yes, he was eng's best batsman after barrington. followed by kp arguably and then root. I don't rate cook on the same level as these guys. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now