Umpires will think twice now !!!

[Willow_on_fire]

No more aussie crap appealing and bump catches will be favoured...and that is a big blow to aussie cricket...aussies have mis-used their world champ status to the max....but since bucknor was fcuknored...things have changed now....shove it up aussies....:haha:

[fineleg]

itz a blow to auzzie cricket...but that does not mean they will stop dominating just coz they've lost umpiring goof ups in their favor. they'll have to work harder - but they will.

[Pancho]

what bump catches ? oh you mean this one.. ? bOr-81K49Ks get over the umps in the test series. its lame, especially when there is some good cricket being played.

[Willow_on_fire]

what bump catches ? oh you mean this one.. ? bOr-81K49Ks get over the umps in the test series. its lame, especially when there is some good cricket being played.

can you post the VDO of clark as well?...thanks

[Pancho]

nah there is no footage.. besides anil kumble settled it with clarke and believed him when he told him 100% he caught it. so the only problem seems to be you guys ? even when your captain has settled it.. whinging much ?

[Willow_on_fire]

nah there is no footage.. besides anil kumble settled it with clarke and believed him when he told him 100% he caught it. so the only problem seems to be you guys ? even when your captain has settled it.. whinging much ?

Well...Kumble is a gentleman....and aussies are cowards/cheats....once bitten...twice shy...Kumble scrapped the crappy rule...and ponting has to perform now...no more cheating....:haha:

[fineleg]

Well...Kumble is a gentleman....and aussies are cowards/cheats....once bitten...twice shy...Kumble scrapped the crappy rule...and ponting has to perform now...no more cheating....:haha:

:two_thumbs_up:

[Pancho]

Well...Kumble is a gentleman....and aussies are cowards/cheats....once bitten...twice shy...Kumble scrapped the crappy rule...and ponting has to perform now...no more cheating....:haha:

suppose we cheated in the 2003 world cup final then huh ? kumble a gentleman ? bwhahaha please. how was the appeal for the bat-pad catch in adelaide where it hit symonds square on the knee ? gentleman bwhahaha thats hillarious. kumble is one of the biggest over appealers in the game.

[16 str8]

Are people in here forgetting the reason that we now have neutral umpires in test cricket is because of the way touring teams that visited Indian and Pakistan in the past were treated? They were on the receiving end of blatant cheating, there's no other way to put it. If it weren't for this, Australia and India may have had Simon Taufel, the umpire who has been voted Umpire of the year every year since 2004, in control of the match. If this were the case who is to say that Ponting would not have received a terrible LBW decision when he was given out in the first innings, and Symonds may have been given out when he edged it. But no, India had to ruin it for the rest of the world and it's coming back to haunt them. Thanks India.

[Rohip]

If it weren't for this' date=' Australia and India may have had Simon Taufel, the umpire who has been voted Umpire of the year every year since 2004, in control of the match.[/quote'] Either him or Darrel 'The Racist' Hair so your argument is ****

[16 str8]

Either him or Darrel 'The Racist' Hair so your argument is ****

Wow, you showed me Rohip. Oh that's right, if a decision goes against an Indian/Pakistan then it is clearly racist......Great argument, well done!! If the Pakistani's didn't tamper with the ball, there would be no problem. If Murali didn't chuck, there would be no problem. Why can't some teams just play by the rules? Australia plays by the rules, and it has dominated cricket like no other team in history. I don't get it.........

[talksport]

Bucknor is Bucknored

:haha::haha:

[kablooee87]

Wow, you showed me Rohip. Oh that's right, if a decision goes against an Indian/Pakistan then it is clearly racist......Great argument, well done!! If the Pakistani's didn't tamper with the ball, there would be no problem. If Murali didn't chuck, there would be no problem. Why can't some teams just play by the rules? Australia plays by the rules, and it has dominated cricket like no other team in history. I don't get it.........

You've hit the nail on the head with that last statement.

[Rohip]

Wow, you showed me Rohip. Oh that's right, if a decision goes against an Indian/Pakistan then it is clearly racist......Great argument, well done!! If the Pakistani's didn't tamper with the ball, there would be no problem. If Murali didn't chuck, there would be no problem. Why can't some teams just play by the rules? Australia plays by the rules, and it has dominated cricket like no other team in history. I don't get it.........

Hair's an Aussie so there's no way he can be in the wrong must be those brown people who are the cheaters like the Indians, the Pakis and the Sri Lankans Aussies are the most fair non-bump catch claiming, always walking people on the earth. i mean Gilly never claims a catch which he knows didnt edge the bat, of course he doesnt he's a walker so come on umpires give him the benefit

[IndianRenegade]

nah there is no footage.. besides anil kumble settled it with clarke and believed him when he told him 100% he caught it. so the only problem seems to be you guys ? even when your captain has settled it.. whinging much ?

Where did Kumble tell he believed him, Kumble told he understands what clarke says thats all! And there is no evidence huh?

[IndianRenegade]

See the Pup who is 100% sure of what he does, did at 3:57: LpYKrstzVmw

[MundaPakistani]

Are people in here forgetting the reason that we now have neutral umpires in test cricket is because of the way touring teams that visited Indian and Pakistan in the past were treated? They were on the receiving end of blatant cheating, there's no other way to put it. If it weren't for this, Australia and India may have had Simon Taufel, the umpire who has been voted Umpire of the year every year since 2004, in control of the match. If this were the case who is to say that Ponting would not have received a terrible LBW decision when he was given out in the first innings, and Symonds may have been given out when he edged it. But no, India had to ruin it for the rest of the world and it's coming back to haunt them. Thanks India.

this happened all around the world. On Pak's tour of WI in 1988 the umpire himself admitted that he was cheating because he was worried that the locals would burn his house down. Then there was Gooch's run out of 1992 where he was out by yards and is widely considered as one of the worst decisions in the history of test cricket.

[chanakya]

Are people in here forgetting the reason that we now have neutral umpires in test cricket is because of the way touring teams that visited Indian and Pakistan in the past were treated? They were on the receiving end of blatant cheating, there's no other way to put it. If it weren't for this, Australia and India may have had Simon Taufel, the umpire who has been voted Umpire of the year every year since 2004, in control of the match. If this were the case who is to say that Ponting would not have received a terrible LBW decision when he was given out in the first innings, and Symonds may have been given out when he edged it. But no, India had to ruin it for the rest of the world and it's coming back to haunt them. Thanks India.

yeah he might have even given Ponting out to Ganguly before that. At that time it was because of the way touring teams that visited Indian and Pakistan in the past were treated? Let's just say it was because the power in cricket at that time lay in the hands of some other people who are always honest. Not to forget the 90 over a day rule which was brought into place because of the WI time wasting tactics which was blatantly being forgotten in the Perth test match for some time.

[16 str8]

yeah he might have even given Ponting out to Ganguly before that. At that time it was because of the way touring teams that visited Indian and Pakistan in the past were treated? Let's just say it was because the power in cricket at that time lay in the hands of some other people who are always honest. Not to forget the 90 over a day rule which was brought into place because of the WI time wasting tactics which was blatantly being forgotten in the Perth test match for some time.

Come on, at least have some understading of what happened in Perth before you start accusing players of things. Ponting was forced to bowl the part timers Clarke and Symonds for longer than he wanted because of the slow over rate. He did this because he was facing the possibility of being suspended for 1 match. Hardly "blatantly being forgotten" is it? And on the matter of time wasting, how about that stunt the Indians pulled by sending out Sharma with the wrong gloves in the dying stages at Sydney? What a low act. Luckily it didn't affect the outcome of the match.

[Gambit]

this happened all around the world. On Pak's tour of WI in 1988 the umpire himself admitted that he was cheating because he was worried that the locals would burn his house down. Then there was Gooch's run out of 1992 where he was out by yards and is widely considered as one of the worst decisions in the history of test cricket.

I've heard a lot about that. Got a clip?