Khota Posted October 27, 2019 Author Share Posted October 27, 2019 29 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: highest wkt taker of the series doesnt take a place he owns it.....he was the best bowler of the series so he owns it Yea in some years when ull disappear from ICF coz he ll break so many records at a rate that many cudnt Also nadeem came in for kuldeep place...ashwin n jadeja are legend in indian condition and their position cant be touched. Their record is as good as any ATG at home Someone just did and ICF experts are insecure. Link to comment
Ankit_sharma03 Posted October 27, 2019 Share Posted October 27, 2019 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Khota said: Someone just did and ICF experts are insecure. really who touched the guy who didnt find a place in next test ....so the joke is on u and even if he wud have Fact check it wud have been for kuldeep not ashwin Ashwin n jadeja cannot be dropped in Indian condition in test when they do ping me ......till then live in ur delusion as ashwin will keep breaking records left right centre Edited October 27, 2019 by Ankit_sharma03 Link to comment
Khota Posted October 27, 2019 Author Share Posted October 27, 2019 1 hour ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: really who touched the guy who didnt find a place in next test ....so the joke is on u and even if he wud have Fact check it wud have been for kuldeep not ashwin Ashwin n jadeja cannot be dropped in Indian condition in test when they do ping me ......till then live in ur delusion as ashwin will keep breaking records left right centre Same arrogant reason why Murali cannot be dropped but it did cost India two series wins. Link to comment
Ankit_sharma03 Posted October 27, 2019 Share Posted October 27, 2019 (edited) 35 minutes ago, Khota said: Same arrogant reason why Murali cannot be dropped but it did cost India two series wins. Are u fcking serious....vijay was struggling for runs....ashwin is the highest wkt taker of series....how is that same . Murali alone didnt cost those series ....for u memory all 3 openers failed and pujara n rahane were extremely inconsistent to. No one players can loose a series These two are winning series after series at home.....for info India hasnt lost a series since 2012 at home....so complain when they loose at home . Ashwin avg 22 at home jadeja 20...... So they are untouchable at home......not only that these 2 contribute with bat which nadeem , kuldeep cant Edited October 27, 2019 by Ankit_sharma03 Link to comment
Ankit_sharma03 Posted October 27, 2019 Share Posted October 27, 2019 38 minutes ago, Khota said: Same arrogant reason why Murali cannot be dropped but it did cost India two series wins. as if ur suggestion to include dhawan n kartik won us in England.....both were **** n got kicked out permanently post that in test cricket Link to comment
Muloghonto Posted October 27, 2019 Share Posted October 27, 2019 8 hours ago, Khota said: How on earth did you come to this conclusion it is one off? Maybe it is the norm. It is a one off because it has happened only once. A singular instance is always one off in statistics. But what isn’t a one off is Ashwin destroying Dartbhajan when they played together . Link to comment
Khota Posted October 28, 2019 Author Share Posted October 28, 2019 5 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: Are u fcking serious....vijay was struggling for runs....ashwin is the highest wkt taker of series....how is that same . Murali alone didnt cost those series ....for u memory all 3 openers failed and pujara n rahane were extremely inconsistent to. No one players can loose a series These two are winning series after series at home.....for info India hasnt lost a series since 2012 at home....so complain when they loose at home . Ashwin avg 22 at home jadeja 20...... So they are untouchable at home......not only that these 2 contribute with bat which nadeem , kuldeep cant So a new guy comes along, outperforms but the brahmins of Indian cricket are untouchables. When you learn to understand that anyone can be dropped than you will understand sports. Nothing against you but you know zilch about competitive sports. Link to comment
Khota Posted October 28, 2019 Author Share Posted October 28, 2019 5 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: as if ur suggestion to include dhawan n kartik won us in England.....both were **** n got kicked out permanently post that in test cricket Dhawan >>>> Murali as an opener. Kartik >>>>> Dhoni as wkt kpr. Link to comment
Khota Posted October 28, 2019 Author Share Posted October 28, 2019 5 hours ago, Muloghonto said: It is a one off because it has happened only once. A singular instance is always one off in statistics. But what isn’t a one off is Ashwin destroying Dartbhajan when they played together . This will be the norm if he gets the opportunity. The simple explanation is why Nadeem did better is because as of now Ashwin sucks. Link to comment
Muloghonto Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 27 minutes ago, Khota said: This will be the norm if he gets the opportunity. This is a wishful thinking from a biassed person like you, not fact. 27 minutes ago, Khota said: The simple explanation is why Nadeem did better is because as of now Ashwin sucks. The simple explanation is , it’s a one off fluke, which one offs are. And if Nadeem is better than Ashwin due to a one off, Ashwin is definitely better than Bhajji coz he outdid Bhajji in five times as many games as Nadeem has to Ashwin. Link to comment
Muloghonto Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 32 minutes ago, Khota said: So a new guy comes along, outperforms but the brahmins of Indian cricket are untouchables. When you learn to understand that anyone can be dropped than you will understand sports. Nothing against you but you know zilch about competitive sports. Nowhere in competitive sports do we drop a stalwart ball of famer because a newbie on his debut outdid the stalwart. Link to comment
Khota Posted October 28, 2019 Author Share Posted October 28, 2019 4 minutes ago, Muloghonto said: This is a wishful thinking from a biassed person like you, not fact. The simple explanation is , it’s a one off fluke, which one offs are. And if Nadeem is better than Ashwin due to a one off, Ashwin is definitely better than Bhajji coz he outdid Bhajji in five times as many games as Nadeem has to Ashwin. Why is Bhajji in this discussion? If your guy is so good he would not take double the overs to get half the wkts. Link to comment
Khota Posted October 28, 2019 Author Share Posted October 28, 2019 4 minutes ago, Muloghonto said: Nowhere in competitive sports do we drop a stalwart ball of famer because a newbie on his debut outdid the stalwart. We bench them all the time. Kindly use the word stalwart carefully. Link to comment
Muloghonto Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 15 minutes ago, Khota said: Why is Bhajji in this discussion? If your guy is so good he would not take double the overs to get half the wkts. Because of consistency in your argument. If A >B based on 1 sample, then B>C based on 5 samples. Link to comment
Muloghonto Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 15 minutes ago, Khota said: We bench them all the time. Kindly use the word stalwart carefully. So name one time a debutant has caused an ALLTIME GREAT STALWART to be benched in any sport, after just one game. we are using the word Stalwart carefully. Ashwin is a stalwart. Bhajji was not. Link to comment
Khota Posted October 28, 2019 Author Share Posted October 28, 2019 53 minutes ago, Muloghonto said: Because of consistency in your argument. If A >B based on 1 sample, then B>C based on 5 samples. So A is greater than B. Thanks! Link to comment
Khota Posted October 28, 2019 Author Share Posted October 28, 2019 52 minutes ago, Muloghonto said: So name one time a debutant has caused an ALLTIME GREAT STALWART to be benched in any sport, after just one game. we are using the word Stalwart carefully. Ashwin is a stalwart. Bhajji was not. Seriously? Link to comment
Muloghonto Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 1 hour ago, Khota said: So A is greater than B. Thanks! Cherry picking yet again. If A>B. THEN B>> C. why did you leave that part out ? Link to comment
Muloghonto Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 1 hour ago, Khota said: Seriously? Seriously. Man has ATG numbers. Bhajji was a mediocre and inferior bowler as we have proven and you keep running away from it due to Punjabi pride issues. Link to comment
Ankit_sharma03 Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 (edited) 7 hours ago, Khota said: Dhawan >>>> Murali as an opener. In od's - yes In test - No. Dhawan has 2 tours of SA n ENG yet not a single 50 yea .....even shami scored a 50 in england N we are talking about test cricket something thats played with red ball Quote Kartik >>>>> Dhoni as wkt kpr. Even DK wont agree to that Dhoni - ATG in ODI Kartik- waste of talent ....also what has he done Edited October 28, 2019 by Ankit_sharma03 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now