Zap_Brannigan Posted March 17, 2008 Posted March 17, 2008 Gold digger.I would say slut, prostitute etc., but seeing that she was one, it really wouldn't be an insult. What the hell did she do to earn it?
kumble_rocks Posted March 18, 2008 Posted March 18, 2008 I don't understand this , why did this old man marry her in the first place. It ain't hard to figure out that she is a gold digger ....
Ram Posted March 18, 2008 Posted March 18, 2008 I dont understand this concept of paying money to your ex-spouse after divorce. I dont exactly recall the name, but if i am right, its called repatriation expense or something. Why is it paid and for what ?
CC1981 Posted March 18, 2008 Posted March 18, 2008 Take a lesson from this- and don't forget your prenup agreement before you get married. Else, the girl may clean you out of your hard-earned money in the future.
kumble_rocks Posted March 18, 2008 Posted March 18, 2008 Take a lesson from this- and don't forget your prenup agreement before you get married. Else, the girl may clean you out of your hard-earned money in the future. I was following this on TV and I gather that the prenuptial is not enforceable in UK like the way it is USA. It is totally left to the discretion of the Judge in UK ..Hence her appeal.
CC1981 Posted March 18, 2008 Posted March 18, 2008 Well then we are bolloxed in the UK. I guess it means we should use our brains more and our penis less for making decisions about who we marry.
King Tendulkar Posted March 19, 2008 Author Posted March 19, 2008 Pre nup is not legally binding in Uk. But it can have some influence on judges verdict if drawn up fairly! So they say still best to have one as can help. But must be drawn fairly so still for example mills would have got millions. I dont think anyone agrees with these crazy verdicts. Even women are disgusted by this verdict. These big payouts for short marriages are crazy.
Predator_05 Posted March 19, 2008 Posted March 19, 2008 I dont understand this concept of paying money to your ex-spouse after divorce. I dont exactly recall the name' date=' but if i am right, its called repatriation expense or something. Why is it paid and for what ?[/quote'] In the US, it's called an alimony settlement. It's usually paid out when the spouse is earning significantly less - the judge decides whether she would be able to survive on her own and calls for an alimony settlement based on that.
beetle Posted March 19, 2008 Posted March 19, 2008 Take a lesson from this- and don't forget your prenup agreement before you get married. Else, the girl may clean you out of your hard-earned money in the future. Unless you plan to get a really rich dulhan!:D
Ram Posted March 19, 2008 Posted March 19, 2008 In the US' date=' it's called an alimony settlement. It's usually paid out when the spouse is earning significantly less - the judge decides whether she would be able to survive on her own and calls for an alimony settlement based on that.[/quote'] Yes, Alimony... Thanks.
yoda Posted March 19, 2008 Posted March 19, 2008 She deserves it. Remember she is rasing their kid as well. MC is worth almost a billion dollars.
kumble_rocks Posted March 19, 2008 Posted March 19, 2008 She deserves it. Remember she is rasing their kid as well. MC is worth almost a billion dollars. So you think 50 million dollars is not enough to raise the kid ? Apparently the judge thinks it's ok and so do most public !
yoda Posted March 19, 2008 Posted March 19, 2008 So you think 50 million dollars is not enough to raise the kid ? Apparently the judge thinks it's ok and so do most public ! It all depends on the life style you want your kid to have and how much money the kid as his heir deserves to get. Paul M's kid deserves to live like a queen and yes, 50 mill is prolly enough, but nothing for Sir Paul to be so adamant about not giving.
King Tendulkar Posted March 19, 2008 Author Posted March 19, 2008 It all depends on the life style you want your kid to have and how much money the kid as his heir deserves to get. Paul M's kid deserves to live like a queen and yes, 50 mill is prolly enough, but nothing for Sir Paul to be so adamant about not giving. Well give him custody and then she can have the lifestyle you deem she needs.
kumble_rocks Posted March 19, 2008 Posted March 19, 2008 It all depends on the life style you want your kid to have and how much money the kid as his heir deserves to get. Paul M's kid deserves to live like a queen and yes, 50 mill is prolly enough, but nothing for Sir Paul to be so adamant about not giving. From what I gather , he was willing to settle for that amount outside the court ... She wanted 250 million dollars... The concept of prenuptial took it's nascency in USA because of litigation like this ... You can't expect the man to shell out 250 million dollars for four years marriage ...
Recommended Posts