zen Posted January 26, 2020 Posted January 26, 2020 If the current Indian TM was responsible for it in the late 80s? Guys like Jayasuriya debuted in 89 and were struggling relatively. Would likes of Jayasuriya have survived to win SL the WC in 1996? View overall figures [change view] Primary team Sri Lanka Start of match date between 1 Jan 1989 and 1 Jan 1995 Qualifications runs scored greater than or equal to 1000 Ordered by batting average (reverse) Page 1 of 1 Showing 1 - 6 of 6 First Previous Next Last Return to query menu Cleared query menu Overall figures Player Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 ST Jayasuriya 1989-1994 74 67 2 1161 140 17.86 1579 73.52 1 6 7 HP Tillakaratne 1989-1994 90 76 16 1693 104 28.21 2956 57.27 1 6 3 AP Gurusinha 1989-1994 74 72 4 1920 117* 28.23 3051 62.93 1 10 5 RS Mahanama 1989-1994 84 81 11 2154 119* 30.77 3655 58.93 3 12 5 PA de Silva 1989-1994 92 90 8 2913 107* 35.52 3450 84.43 3 20 4 A Ranatunga 1989-1994 88 83 16 2726 101* 40.68 3437 79.31 1 20 2
Vijy Posted January 26, 2020 Posted January 26, 2020 3 minutes ago, zen said: If the current Indian TM was responsible for it in the late 80s? Guys like Jayasuriya debuted in 89 and were struggling relatively. Would likes of Jayasuriya have survived to win SL the WC in 1996? View overall figures [change view] Primary team Sri Lanka Start of match date between 1 Jan 1989 and 1 Jan 1995 Qualifications runs scored greater than or equal to 1000 Ordered by batting average (reverse) Page 1 of 1 Showing 1 - 6 of 6 First Previous Next Last Return to query menu Cleared query menu Overall figures Player Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 ST Jayasuriya 1989-1994 74 67 2 1161 140 17.86 1579 73.52 1 6 7 HP Tillakaratne 1989-1994 90 76 16 1693 104 28.21 2956 57.27 1 6 3 AP Gurusinha 1989-1994 74 72 4 1920 117* 28.23 3051 62.93 1 10 5 RS Mahanama 1989-1994 84 81 11 2154 119* 30.77 3655 58.93 3 12 5 PA de Silva 1989-1994 92 90 8 2913 107* 35.52 3450 84.43 3 20 4 A Ranatunga 1989-1994 88 83 16 2726 101* 40.68 3437 79.31 1 20 2 SL is a small nation with limited resources. this is why they persisted with jaya so long - and it paid off. on a diff note, just look at how good ranatunga was in between 1989-94. A SR of 80 was very good then as was an avg of 40+. damn fine ODI player.
zen Posted January 26, 2020 Author Posted January 26, 2020 1 minute ago, Vijy said: SL is a small nation with limited resources. this is why they persisted with jaya so long - and it paid off. on a diff note, just look at how good ranatunga was in between 1989-94. A SR of 80 was very good then as was an avg of 40+. damn fine ODI player. This is a hypothetical thread so we have to make some assumptions
Straight Drive Posted January 26, 2020 Posted January 26, 2020 SL in that era was nowhere and they had no option but to build core for a team. There was not other way out.
Vijy Posted January 26, 2020 Posted January 26, 2020 26 minutes ago, Straight Drive said: SL in that era was nowhere and they had no option but to build core for a team. There was not other way out. yes, attapattu had an even worse start to his test career but he became a highly effective HTB (although a midget abroad).
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now