TNAmarkFromIndia Posted September 21, 2020 Posted September 21, 2020 33 minutes ago, Khota said: I think I have mentioned it before, the way cricket does numbers, averages etc. is wrong. I rest my case. You're convincing no one but yourself with that weak closing statement.
Khota Posted September 22, 2020 Author Posted September 22, 2020 17 hours ago, TNAmarkFromIndia said: You're convincing no one but yourself with that weak closing statement. My statement is rooted in science not emotion. If weights are not assigned to different bowlers than runs scored don't matter. Think about it.
TNAmarkFromIndia Posted September 22, 2020 Posted September 22, 2020 43 minutes ago, Khota said: My statement is rooted in science not emotion. What emotion is a player's strike rate rooted in? From any scientific point of view, a strike rate of 79.04 in ODIs in 2018/19 is pathetic. Deeper analysis would show that his average is inflated by soft runs he's scored when bulk of the work was already done by the top order. Ankit_sharma03 1
Ankit_sharma03 Posted September 22, 2020 Posted September 22, 2020 1 hour ago, Khota said: My statement is rooted in science not emotion. If weights are not assigned to different bowlers than runs scored don't matter. Think about it. Rayudu scored against rahul n krunal who were bowling with wet ball and among them u call krunal crap, u are countering urself pretty well
Recommended Posts