India's match ups against pace in T20

[vvvslaxman]

Last 5 years  vs Left Arm Seamers in T20 format

 

Edited February 27, 2022 by vvvslaxman

[vvvslaxman]

Australia seems to be worse than us. 72 wickets lost to them.

[Vijy]

3 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

Australia seems to be worse than us. 72 wickets lost to them.

yes, they are bad. if we have either peak nattu or peak khaleel, both would represent good T20 options. but for that, they need both fitness and form

[Jay]

1 hour ago, Vijy said:

yes, they are bad. if we have either peak nattu or peak khaleel, both would represent good T20 options. but for that, they need both fitness and form

That explains why natts was good in Australia. Even in tests he did quite decently on a dead flat pitch. First time ever. Got to appreciate it. 

[Vijy]

12 minutes ago, Jay said:

That explains why natts was good in Australia. Even in tests he did quite decently on a dead flat pitch. First time ever. Got to appreciate it. 

yes, if anything, his test performance was even more impressive given his paucity of FC experience and being labelled a T20 specialist.

[Jay]

2 minutes ago, Vijy said:

yes, if anything, his test performance was even more impressive given his paucity of FC experience and being labelled a T20 specialist.

He was brilliant. Cleaned up the tail. If tahane had the nous to play him early vs tail, he would have cleaned them up. Could have been all out for 300 instead of 360 whatever. 

He was no scrub in first class though. He had an average of 27 on dead pitches. Indian wickets is the toughest wicket for fast bowler to excel in.