Pujara 2.0 or is this the beginning of the end?

[raki05]

Pata nahi bc iin logo ko kyun dho rahey hai. I can understand TM and commrntrators are on BCCI pay scale so they need to back him, but it's surprising to see people here supports such mediocre performer and his non performance since past 2-3 years. He just play one format and even in that he is so pathetic.

[Vijy]

32 minutes ago, raki05 said:

Pata nahi bc iin logo ko kyun dho rahey hai. I can understand TM and commrntrators are on BCCI pay scale so they need to back him, but it's surprising to see people here supports such mediocre performer and his non performance since past 2-3 years. He just play one format and even in that he is so pathetic.

we have so many poor players. iyer is a walking wicket outside SC (and perhaps even within SC), bharath is not a capable batter; the holy trinity of brat, kela, chepu need no introduction; gill is a flashy wannabe who should stick to LOIs

[raki05]

1 hour ago, Vijy said:

we have so many poor players. iyer is a walking wicket outside SC (and perhaps even within SC), bharath is not a capable batter; the holy trinity of brat, kela, chepu need no introduction; gill is a flashy wannabe who should stick to LOIs

Gill, Iyer are still young and wanting their place but Pujara is a non performer since long time. What's the benifit of having him.

[Vijy]

1 minute ago, raki05 said:

Gill, Iyer are still young and wanting their place but Pujara is a non performer since long time. What's the benifit of having him.

no benefit for sure. likewise, no benefit having young duds either... let's get some proper all-conditions test batters into the team instead