Ram Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 Running on a regular basis can slow the effects of ageing, a study by US researchers shows. Elderly joggers were half as likely to die prematurely from conditions like cancer than non-runners. They also enjoyed a healthier life with fewer disabilities, the Stanford University Medical Center team found. Experts said the findings in Archives of Internal Medicine reinforced the importance that older people exercise regularly. Survival of the fittest The work tracked 500 older runners for more than 20 years, comparing them to a similar group of non-runners. All were in their 50s at the start of the study. Nineteen years into the study, 34% of the non-runners had died compared to only 15% of the runners. Both groups became more disabled with age, but for the runners the onset of disability started later - an average of 16 years later. The health gap between the runners and non-runners continued to widen even as the subjects entered their ninth decade of life. Running not only appeared to slow the rate of heart and artery related deaths, but was also associated with fewer early deaths from cancer, neurological disease, infections and other causes. And there was no evidence that runners were more likely to suffer osteoarthritis or need total knee replacements than non-runners - something scientists have feared. At the beginning of the study, the runners ran for about four hours a week on average. After 21 years, their weekly running time had reduced to around 76 minutes, but they were still seeing health benefits from taking regular exercise. Lead author Professor James Fries, from the University of California at Stanford, said: "The study has a very pro-exercise message. If you had to pick one thing to make people healthier as they age, it would be aerobic exercise. "The health benefits of exercise are greater than we thought." Age Concern says many older people do not exercise enough. Figures show more than 90% of people in the UK over 75 fail to meet international guidelines of half-an-hour moderate intensity exercise at least five times a week. Gordon Lishman, director general, said: "This research re-confirms the clear benefits of regular exercise for older people. "Exercise can help older people to stay mobile and independent, ensure a healthy heart, keep weight and stress levels under control, and promote better sleep. "While younger people are barraged with encouragement to lead healthier lifestyles, the health needs of older people are often overlooked." http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7554293.stm
Guest dada_rocks Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 Next day someone will come up and say actually no running expedites the aging proces.. Thes eguys should stop calling themselves researcher.. They go to town for the media soundbite with under-cooked resultds .
THX_1138 Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 irrespective of what the old fart DR has to say, running is indeed an incredible cardiovascular activity and personally i can vouch for its effectiveness as an exercise. furthermore, a cardiovascular activity that strengthens the bones and burns excess calories can undoubtedly contribute towards a greater longevity.
Lurker Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 It is basic common sense isn't it? Running will get you in better health by kicking up your metabolism, burning unwanted fat, improving cardio vascular activity and increase lung capacity. Why wont it help people live longer? Heck I also love the feeling of running and feeling just a miniscule amount of movement in my cheeks. I swear people who run have a healthier skin tone than those who dont. My only dislike for running, well two dislikes: a) it can get monotonous. b) it puts stress on knee, specially if one is not using the correct shoe.
beetle Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 Really? Running is better than not running!What a surprise!:--D
Ram Posted August 12, 2008 Author Posted August 12, 2008 The only thing I find strange in the article; the beginning of the study, the runners ran for about four hours a week on average. Thats 30 mins a day! Thats just too high, IMO. There is no need to run for 30 mins A DAY for general health. 4 times a week, of 25 mins of cardio-vascular activity is sufficient enough, according to the material I have gone through
Ram Posted August 12, 2008 Author Posted August 12, 2008 It is basic common sense isn't it? Running will get you in better health by kicking up your metabolism, burning unwanted fat, improving cardio vascular activity and increase lung capacity. Why wont it help people live longer? Heck I also love the feeling of running and feeling just a miniscule amount of movement in my cheeks. I swear people who run have a healthier skin tone than those who dont. My only dislike for running, well two dislikes: a) it can get monotonous. b) it puts stress on knee, specially if one is not using the correct shoe. You forgot one thing, Its bloody hard work! :D
kumble_rocks Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 It is basic common sense isn't it? Running will get you in better health by kicking up your metabolism, burning unwanted fat, improving cardio vascular activity and increase lung capacity. Why wont it help people live longer? Heck I also love the feeling of running and feeling just a miniscule amount of movement in my cheeks. I swear people who run have a healthier skin tone than those who dont. My only dislike for running, well two dislikes: a) it can get monotonous. b) it puts stress on knee, specially if one is not using the correct shoe. I always thought running can be replaced by brisk walking with the same benefits ! Is it true ?
Lurker Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 I always thought running can be replaced by brisk walking with the same benefits ! Is it true ? I wish I had a straight answer to that KR. First of all brisk walking is great. However the difference between brisk walking and running(atleast to me) is that in the former you essentially rev up the cardio, sweat hard and bump up your metabolism. However when you run you do all of these and you work more of your body as well. I mean if you do a brisk walk, and you run, you will feel that in the former your tummy just doesnt get half the work. If you run your tummy practically reminds you every step, if you are overweight in anyway. Brisk walking is great but I would probably go with running. And if I had to pick one cardio exercise it would be running/brisk walking up the stairs.
kumble_rocks Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 I wish I had a straight answer to that KR. First of all brisk walking is great. However the difference between brisk walking and running(atleast to me) is that in the former you essentially rev up the cardio, sweat hard and bump up your metabolism. However when you run you do all of these and you work more of your body as well. I mean if you do a brisk walk, and you run, you will feel that in the former your tummy just doesnt get half the work. If you run your tummy practically reminds you every step, if you are overweight in anyway. Brisk walking is great but I would probably go with running. And if I had to pick one cardio exercise it would be running/brisk walking up the stairs. Thanks for your reply.
Lurker Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 Lurks, Instead of doing 30 mins of running on a Treadmill at Zero incline can someone substitute that with 10 minutes at full incline at say 4MPH. Which is a better exercise ? The better exercise would be the 30 minutes one BB. Specially if you are looking to burn fat. See what happens is that for the first 10-15 minutes of the running/walking the body utilizes carbs since they are the fastest source of energy. After about 15 minutes the body starts burning stored fat. So if you are doing 30 minutes walking/running you effectively burn up fat for atleast 15 minutes of that. Of course you get the cardio workout as well. If you run on incline at say 4 mile an hour for 30 minutes that will burn lot more calories than say running at 4 miles for 30 minutes on zero incline. So see what works better for you. However if you are planning to lose weight go for a longer period and not the shorter one. Additionally if you can then do this early morning first thing on empty stomach. This will ensure your body starts using stored fat right away(since there is no carbs). If you want to push up the ante have some black coffee and see how it kicks your body overtime. xx
yoda Posted August 12, 2008 Posted August 12, 2008 I should have mentioned that my aim is to not burn fat / weight loss ... my aim is to get cardio fit (again not like a Marathon runner but say avg or little above avg fitness ). you forgot to add....and to spend as little time as possible in that activity. :D
Desi Cartman Posted August 13, 2008 Posted August 13, 2008 :omg: mein nadaaan pagla running he nahi kurta ... I hope this also helps
THX_1138 Posted August 13, 2008 Posted August 13, 2008 The only thing I find strange in the article; Thats 30 mins a day! Thats just too high, IMO. There is no need to run for 30 mins A DAY for general health. 4 times a week, of 25 mins of cardio-vascular activity is sufficient enough, according to the material I have gone through its not that much. even with a wounded knee i can average about 40 minutes a day... and its not that bad. try it some times, and you will notice that it gives you quite a rush! the endorphins released by your body to combat the pain from each shockwave supposedly has a greater high than snorting cocaine. i have never done coke nor do i intend to, but yeah, i get a really really peaceful night's sleep right afterwards.
THX_1138 Posted August 13, 2008 Posted August 13, 2008 :omg: mein nadaaan pagla running he nahi kurta ... I hope this also helps actually that is more effective, especially if you employ the hand resistance as well. besides that removes the impact injuries. though running on a semi hard surface such as grass for an hour or so a week will stimulate greater bone tissue density growth. this was the conclusion of a scientist from the university of denver working on ways to strengthen the bones of astronauts who lose a lot of tissue density due to microgravity in space. he concluded that standing on a vibrating platform for 20 minutes a day or impact exercise for 30-60 minutes every week.
Desi Cartman Posted August 13, 2008 Posted August 13, 2008 ^ I try to use it for 5 times a week for 30mins ...
veer Posted August 13, 2008 Posted August 13, 2008 I find running bit boring also... soo I play tennis once or twice every week .. but now I am thinking of doing more running and less tennis... what you think lurker?
DadaRocks Posted August 13, 2008 Posted August 13, 2008 ^ I try to use it for 5 times a week for 30mins ... ur chances of dying of a heart disease will be gr8tly reduced if u make this a habit....:two_thumbs_up:
Lurker Posted August 13, 2008 Posted August 13, 2008 I should have mentioned that my aim is to not burn fat / weight loss ... my aim is to get cardio fit (again not like a Marathon runner but say avg or little above avg fitness ). Sorry I missed it. 10 minutes is still too little BB. To be cardio fit you would have to put in about 20 minutes minimum. Now this doesnt have to be everyday. Start with 3 weeks a day, go upto 4..or more if you enjoy it but 4 days a week is fine. And if you can not get 20 minutes done at one time you can do short bursts. I do 1 minute running(at 6) then walking (at 3.5). Do these alternate minute for 20 minutes total. You will sweat like crazy, bump up your heart and really get cardio working. This is by far my favorite, and most result oriented cardio technique.
Lurker Posted August 13, 2008 Posted August 13, 2008 I find running bit boring also... soo I play tennis once or twice every week .. but now I am thinking of doing more running and less tennis... what you think lurker? Oh count me in on the boring part. Even watching a cricket match becomes boring on treadmille :(( Playing tennis is great Veer but unless you are really giving yourself a workout it may not be very effective. Most players play tennis at a leisurely paced and that may not be good. It is very handy in maintaining flexibility and giving you loose/limber muscles. Still you need running to take care of your heart and bump up metabolism Veer. Dont give up on tennis though, it is great for flexibility..and sudden raising of heart beat if you make a sudden run for a drop shot or the kind.
Recommended Posts