bulbul Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 Duplicate post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crookbond Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 But then what's your meaning of ghetto??Read up on "Ethnic Integration Policies" in Singapore and the constitutional discussions around them. Most of them are public. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malcolm Merlyn Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 Read up on "Ethnic Integration Policies" in Singapore and the constitutional discussions around them. Most of them are public.We are not Singapore.Else most of us will be in jail for criticising the ruling party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandeep Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 Humans are tribal and they tend to try and live in places where they find their own kind - in any country or society. Some degree of self selected segregation is simply unavoidable. This is especially pronounced in India, and I agree with those who say that is not something to be supported. Secondly, there are a whole host of risks that a landlord has to face in Bombay in particular, and in India in general, and this makes them extremely risk averse. It is very difficult for landlords to get tenants to vacate their property if the tenant refuses to co-operate. These risks make the landlords even more selective in who they rent their property to, and the supply-demand equation is very tilted in their favor, enabling them to do so. Bottomline is that Bombay is no different than any other city in India in this aspect. The only reason it makes the news more, is because of acute scarcity and difficulty of getting rental accommodations is more in Bombay due to seriously constrained supply. To use this issue, to slam Bombay is laughable, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coffee_rules Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Humans are tribal and they tend to try and live in places where they find their own kind - in any country or society. Some degree of self selected segregation is simply unavoidable. This is especially pronounced in India, and I agree with those who say that is not something to be supported. Secondly, there are a whole host of risks that a landlord has to face in Bombay in particular, and in India in general, and this makes them extremely risk averse. It is very difficult for landlords to get tenants to vacate their property if the tenant refuses to co-operate. These risks make the landlords even more selective in who they rent their property to, and the supply-demand equation is very tilted in their favor, enabling them to do so. Bottomline is that Bombay is no different than any other city in India in this aspect. The only reason it makes the news more, is because of acute scarcity and difficulty of getting rental accommodations is more in Bombay due to seriously constrained supply. To use this issue, to slam Bombay is laughable, though. No, it is being used to slam bhakts, sanghis, chaddis, jaahils, bhagwa brigade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crookbond Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 We are not Singapore.Else most of us will be in jail for criticising the ruling party.That was an answer to "what ghetto means". I didn't say we were like Singapore. You are free to read other countries or some Indian committee report itself. The EIP is one of the many canonical examples. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts