cowboysfan Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 SL have the most rounded attack. The others are too one dimensional. SL can succeed in most wickets. really?-i would hold off on that till may 2011 the lankans tour england.:winky: Link to comment
amits Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 its ind. the poll is about best bowling line-up, not best bowler. sl is a 1-man bowling attack with mendis Link to comment
Bumper Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 Barring Mendis, the rest of the Lankan attack has been pedestrian outside the subcontinent. That said, Mendis is a HUGE factor, his impact cannot be ignored. Based on the overall potential & balance of the attack, I'd rate Lanka marginally ahead of South Africa. India 3rd (spinners tilt the scales in our favor), England 4th, Australia 5th, Pakistan 6th (dopey-mopey will figure in the same lineup only in fantasy land), followed by the minnows. Link to comment
Lord Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 india has the best bowling attack no doubt.our bench strength is also superb.others are one dimensional Link to comment
Shane Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 Sri Lanka !!! Closely followed by India !!! Link to comment
Lord Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 Sri Lanka !!! Closely followed by India !!! nope.srl doesnt have quality pacers.zak,ishant,RP & sree,munaf combo is much better than vaas,malinga,fernando,maharoof.they havent done well overseas Link to comment
Shane Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 nope.srl doesnt have quality pacers.zak' date='ishant,RP & sree,munaf combo is much better than vaas,malinga,fernando,maharoof.they havent done well overseas[/quote'] Mendis >>> Bhaj ... the attacks are evenly matched ... i pick Sri Lanka Link to comment
Lord Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 Mendis >>> Bhaj ... the attacks are evenly matched ... i pick Sri Lanka zak>> vaas ishant>>malinga RP SINGH>>>FERNANDO u r ony talking about the spin attack.srl is too reliant on M&M even wen they abroad.and they dont have bench strength in that too.mendis is overrated ,he will be sorted out sooner rather than later.even the zimboks played him quite comfortably.and remember we dominated him int the ODI series Link to comment
Shane Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 I hope Mendis is over rated and gets sorted out in the future and Murali retires ... but for now they are the better unit !!! Link to comment
Lord Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 ^^ only when laying in srl Link to comment
Shane Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 ^^ only when laying in srl may be or may be not !!! Link to comment
Lord Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 may be or may be not !!! yeah but india is certainly better wherever they play Link to comment
Shane Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 yeah but india is certainly better wherever they play we havnt yet won a series abroad with the above attack !!! Link to comment
Lord Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 we havnt yet won a series abroad with the above attack !!! but the bowlers apart from mishra has performed.its our batsman who have let us down.we have managed to take 20 wickets in almosst every tour Link to comment
Shane Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 ok ... so have sri lanka Link to comment
Rajan Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 Akhtar and Asif are convicted dope cheats. Akhtar may have got away, but is at a stage where he'd have a cardiac arrest just getting to his bowling mark. Saqlain doesn't make the first team anymore and is looking to get into Bloomsbury XI as a British citizen. Kaneria has worse figures than Harbhhajan & Mishra and will probably be dropped soon, Shoaib Malik is a part-timer slightly worse than Yuvraj or Sehwag and the new guy hasn't played a Test yet. All in all, a completely nonsensical post. No cigars for that one, Rajan. Perhaps you meant it for another forum? thanks for your views.however nonsensical my post is, u would get a reality check- when Pak plays SL -about Akthar and perhaps Kaneria.if judging our bowling in the right perspective with out hyping unduly is nonsensical or giving the devil its due is nonsencial, i have no issues! as far the other forum remark, i am not on a good will mission there but to purely to defend our players and team, even BCCI when it is fair.i have been consistently doing that against aussie,SA and Pak forummers there are many members here who are members there and post regularly and must have read my posts.u r free to point out any of my posts there that u feel i have "meant" for the other forum, or i tried to 'please' the other side of the border, u can PM me here , i will quit both forums if i am wrong.i dont have aliases to make re-entry. if not, plz desist from such remarks. it is unbecoming of a senior member like you to make a snide remark like that in response to a frank observation. thanks. Link to comment
msb1991 Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 Certainly must be Sri Lanka, despite Vaas being past it and the second seamer role being contested between second rate bowlers. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now