sandtest Posted January 26, 2009 Posted January 26, 2009 In case you wondering how?....here is a simple case, let's see if it can open our self-loathing eyes on this republic day. This is a thread created by our resident "secular" stalwart Lurker, about a supposedly Pakistani girl harrased inside a shopping mall in Mumbai. http://www.indiancricketfans.com/showthread.php?t=138716 Basically, the group who attacked were Islamists who got offended becuase a Tatto on her back had words written in Urdu with praise for allah. Now , Indian dhimmi media did their job best as usual and blamed it squarely on "Mumbaikars" attacking pakis, implying that it was some kind of post 26/11 reaction!!...completely shielding any attempt to criticize Islamism. Contrast to this, yesterday, a few chauvisnists attacked a pub and they were termed as "Hindutva" terror in a jiffy by IBN!! And noooone even cared to look inside pub and alleged acts of illegal prostitution flourishing. neverthless, we Indians, lapped it up and continue giving various adjectives like Talibanization yada yada. I have no problem with this, nor do any Indian, but why this duplicity when it comes to criticizing Islamism, can any "seculaar" here answer this??
Kohum Posted January 26, 2009 Posted January 26, 2009 Dude - why do you expect Lurker to even respond. Lurker's first and only post in the thread was: http://mumbaimirror.com/article/2/20...tattoo-in-Urdu People who are working in NGO get their Moms to assault ladies! Today there was an article by Ramchandra Guha in Outlook suggesting how he was welcomed everywhere in Pakistan, here we seem hell bent on beating comedians and students from across the border. Sab saalon ne milke Mumbai ki maan **** di hai. With the title - this is not the mumbai I loved. He/She/it seem to have the same self-loathing mentality and seems to manufacture news out of his own "understanding".
seedhi Posted January 26, 2009 Posted January 26, 2009 Forget the lunatic pseudos here. What about the media and the central govt? When the girl was attacked by islamists, did any minister term them as Taliban? No. Yet in the Mangalore incident Renuka Chaudhary has equated the hooligans with Taliban. It must be the height of irony that the tag "Taliban" is now reserved for Hindus in India. Waaaah re waah. The standard operating procedure of the media and the pseudos is : If Muslims riot/vandalize - blame "Indians" for it and hush the matter up. No mention of religion. If Hindus do so - call it Hindu/Hindutva terror, label them as Taliban and act as if a terrorist attack has taken place.
coffee_rules Posted January 26, 2009 Posted January 26, 2009 But if we target women to discipline them forcefully and bring down historical monuments, we are heading towards taliban.
The Outsider Posted January 26, 2009 Posted January 26, 2009 Basically, the group who attacked were Islamists who got offended becuase a Tatto on her back had words written in Urdu with praise for allah. Contrast to this, yesterday, a few chauvisnists attacked a pub and they were termed as "Hindutva" terror in a jiffy by IBN!! When the girl was attacked by islamists, did any minister term them as Taliban? Yet in the Mangalore incident Renuka Chaudhary has equated the hooligans with Taliban :laugh: This is gut splitting stuff by Bhagwa Brigade!!
The Outsider Posted January 26, 2009 Posted January 26, 2009 Contrast to this, yesterday, a few chauvisnists attacked a pub and they were termed as "Hindutva" terror in a jiffy by IBN!! And noooone even cared to look inside pub and alleged acts of illegal prostitution flourishing. neverthless, we Indians, lapped it up and continue giving various adjectives like Talibanization yada yada. Yeah, I've met a few samples from your category. Ladki ke haath mein daaru ka glass, aur munh mein cigarette dekhi aur r.andi r.andi chillana shuru ho gaye.
Ram Posted January 26, 2009 Posted January 26, 2009 :hahaha: The worst exponents of double standards/selective amnesia whining about duplicity in the media... I've seen it all... The media may have gone overboard in blowing up the M'lore incident as some sort of Hindu extremism, but the distinguished members of the Saffron Brigade should the LAST group of peoples on this planet to raise their voice against biased journalism coz they spare no effort in often quoting articles and opinions of fellow members of the Right-wing Brigade who are also part of the media. This is like Exxon Mobil holding a protest meeting outside Greenpeace H'quarters... :haha:
Ram Posted January 26, 2009 Posted January 26, 2009 Again, it does not matter to these people if what 'Ram Sena' did was right or wrong. All it matters is the so-called duplicity of the so-called Dhimmi media. The experts at skirting the real-issue and browbeating useless ones are at it again.. Just sample a set of their reactions to the M'lore incident and their brazen double standards will come to the fore. First, when many people condemned the incident, you had the Saffron Brigade cry foul that 'Well, look at the Jihadis, they're even worse'.. Then we had them go 'They're calling it Hindu terrorism, why didnt they call the Mumbai incident Taliban terrorism?'.. These may look like valid questions at the surface, but probe a little deeper and you'll know that the shameless blame-game is the foundation of all such notions. However, I am willing to bet a million dollars with anyone promising that you'll NEVER find even single member of the saffron brigade denouncing anything that is flawed with their beloved Hindutva ideology. Their favorite diversionary tactic is, if someone points a finger at their extreme ideology, their immediate knee-jerk reaction is 'Look at the muslims...'... :haha:
suraj Posted January 26, 2009 Posted January 26, 2009 My view is that these so called Ram Sevaks should be punished severly and it is disgusting that such an event took place; of course Taliban is the worst of the worst but there is no point either in labelling them Taliban or trying to minimize this crime by justifying that Taliban is worse; we expect better standards from our nation so there should be outright condemnation and denouncement of the theories floated around by these Ram sevaks. Conversely though we should call for the heads of Islamic fanatic bastards and spit on the faces of the so called "Islamic jehad" when terrorists kill 200 people for being kaffirs instead of trying to be politically correct and going overboard in protecting "Islam" or "Muslim" terminology. Come to think of it if we start denouncing anything brought up in name of religion except for social service, 90% of our problemd will be solved.
seedhi Posted January 26, 2009 Posted January 26, 2009 It is only in the twisted minds of the pseudo-secular brigade that the weird logic holds that "criticizing the overhype of the Mangalore incident by media and secular parties = justifying thses attacks"! No one is defending bashing up of girls in a pub. But why should one stay silent when the media and the pseudo brigade goes overboard with this? I saw clips on NDTV asking people from Kolkata and Mumbai for their opinions.. where were these people when Muslims rioted protesting the danish cartoons, or the muslim girl was beaten up in Mumbai for sporting a koranic tattoo? Why arent Muslim rioters never labelled as Taliban? I dont see how questioning the obvious media bias amounts to supporting the Sri Ram Sena. During entire Mumbai attacks these same media people refrained from using Islamic terrorism. But here they dont shy from labeling them as Hindu terrorists and then equate them to Taliban. Its clear that rationality and objectivity have been sacrificed at the altar of political correctness.
suraj Posted January 26, 2009 Posted January 26, 2009 It is only in the twisted minds of the pseudo-secular brigade that the weird logic holds that "criticizing the overhype of the Mangalore incident by media and secular parties = justifying thses attacks"! No one is defending bashing up of girls in a pub. But why should one stay silent when the media and the pseudo brigade goes overboard with this? I saw clips on NDTV asking people from Kolkata and Mumbai for their opinions.. where were these people when Muslims rioted protesting the danish cartoons, or the muslim girl was beaten up in Mumbai for sporting a koranic tattoo? Why arent Muslim rioters never labelled as Taliban? I dont see how questioning the obvious media bias amounts to supporting the Sri Ram Sena. During entire Mumbai attacks these same media people refrained from using Islamic terrorism. But here they dont shy from labeling them as Hindu terrorists and then equate them to Taliban. Its clear that rationality and objectivity have been sacrificed at the altar of political correctness. These are actually very valid points and that is why it is important that when we say "we don't want to be Taliban" it should mean Indians not just Hindus while Muslims are given a free ride just because something offends their jehadi feelings.
gs Posted January 26, 2009 Posted January 26, 2009 It is only in the twisted minds of the pseudo-secular brigade that the weird logic holds that "criticizing the overhype of the Mangalore incident by media and secular parties = justifying thses attacks"! No one is defending bashing up of girls in a pub. But why should one stay silent when the media and the pseudo brigade goes overboard with this? I saw clips on NDTV asking people from Kolkata and Mumbai for their opinions.. where were these people when Muslims rioted protesting the danish cartoons, or the muslim girl was beaten up in Mumbai for sporting a koranic tattoo? Why arent Muslim rioters never labelled as Taliban? I dont see how questioning the obvious media bias amounts to supporting the Sri Ram Sena. During entire Mumbai attacks these same media people refrained from using Islamic terrorism. But here they dont shy from labeling them as Hindu terrorists and then equate them to Taliban. Its clear that rationality and objectivity have been sacrificed at the altar of political correctness. Absolutely! :two_thumbs_up:
Guest dada_rocks Posted January 26, 2009 Posted January 26, 2009 In case you wondering how?....here is a simple case, let's see if it can open our self-loathing eyes on this republic day. This is a thread created by our resident "secular" stalwart Lurker, about a supposedly Pakistani girl harrased inside a shopping mall in Mumbai. http://www.indiancricketfans.com/showthread.php?t=138716 Basically, the group who attacked were Islamists who got offended becuase a Tatto on her back had words written in Urdu with praise for allah. Now , Indian dhimmi media did their job best as usual and blamed it squarely on "Mumbaikars" attacking pakis, implying that it was some kind of post 26/11 reaction!!...completely shielding any attempt to criticize Islamism. Contrast to this, yesterday, a few chauvisnists attacked a pub and they were termed as "Hindutva" terror in a jiffy by IBN!! And noooone even cared to look inside pub and alleged acts of illegal prostitution flourishing. neverthless, we Indians, lapped it up and continue giving various adjectives like Talibanization yada yada. I have no problem with this, nor do any Indian, but why this duplicity when it comes to criticizing Islamism, can any "seculaar" here answer this?? So once again season of associating individuals with their religion has returned no points for guessing I had no problem wiht this had the morons been consistent.. BTW didn't know lurker mian wud be embarrased so swiftly.. Another similar thuggery comes fom fineless ..see her using the wide brush in that pub.. come islamist jihadist moronic behaviour she spends all her time in establishing how this incidetn must be seen in isolation:--D
youngindia Posted January 27, 2009 Posted January 27, 2009 Alll communalists(sangh parivar is a big representative) are a monument to human stupidity. This moronic thread proves it again :) can't these hindutvadi morons understand that others may not give primacy to religious identity or not obsessed with a racist mentality? not everyone in the world is as abominable or unbelievably stupid as you lot. lurker saw the attack on the pakistani girl as a blot on a city he loves. what's wrong with it? why do these shameless hindutvadi creatures want others to condemn islamism when they are unbashed supporters of communalism of the sangh parivar? am i supposed to take these morons seriously?
Guest dada_rocks Posted January 27, 2009 Posted January 27, 2009 Alll communalists(sangh parivar is a big representative) are a monument to human stupidity. This moronic thread proves it again :) can't these hindutvadi morons understand that others may not give primacy to religious identity or not obsessed with a racist mentality? not everyone in the world is as abominable or unbelievably stupid as you lot. lurker saw the attack on the pakistani girl as a blot on a city he loves. what's wrong with it? why do these shameless hindutvadi creatures want others to condemn islamism when they are unbashed supporters of communalism of the sangh parivar? am i supposed to take these morons seriously? nothign wrong you idiot except the same lurker and company starts usng wide brush when similar eyesore of an incident happens on the other side .. if you cant see the duplicity I guess you are yet to learn logic 101
Recommended Posts