Gambit Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 Please post in new thread. http://www.indiancricketfans.com/showthread.php?t=143006
Gambit Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 Oh c'mon fbm and Dan. That is ridiculous. Please select someone else as the 5th bowler.
Gambit Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 Vote regarding Minnow Stats to be excluded - YES
f.b.m Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 OK, I think just one replacement is enough. Otherwise, it'll just drag on for too long. And as for minnows, yeah you can exclude them. The reason I say that is because our team is completely free of minnow bashers. And besides, our very own Chandu bhai performs better against quality teams anyway.
nospam Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 how do guys calculate MRichardson away avg? his home stats: 1 innings 9 overs 16 runs and 1 wicket. away stats: hasnt bowled
rahuliverpool Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 OK, I think just one replacement is enough. Otherwise, it'll just drag on for too long. And as for minnows, yeah you can exclude them. The reason I say that is because our team is completely free of minnow bashers. And besides, our very own Chandu bhai performs better against quality teams anyway. We dun need the explanation, just an answer !
SachDan Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 OK, I think just one replacement is enough. Otherwise, it'll just drag on for too long. And as for minnows, yeah you can exclude them. The reason I say that is because our team is completely free of minnow bashers. And besides, our very own Chandu bhai performs better against quality teams anyway. another master stroke ?:cantstop: kidding...but if you exclude minnows,calculation won't be easy by any means !
f.b.m Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 f.b.m' date=' kya kare ??[/quote'] OK, we can change it to Michael Clarke. But then again, its unfair to us who had this in mind since quite early. It was deliberately planned since 4-5 players were selected.
zubinpepsi Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 no. No ! NO OK, I think just one replacement is enough. Otherwise, it'll just drag on for too long. And as for minnows, yeah you can exclude them. The reason I say that is because our team is completely free of minnow bashers. And besides, our very own Chandu bhai performs better against quality teams anyway. pls jus one per team.... read b4 posting.. kthxbye
punjabi_khota Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 how do guys calculate MRichardson away avg? his home stats: 1 innings 9 overs 16 runs and 1 wicket. away stats: hasnt bowled PWNED. Choose infinity for away average.
Guest Hiten. Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 What exactly is this, Gambit ? What is the point of picking World XI ?
f.b.m Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 Damn, Clarke's average has gone all the way up to 37. That dents our ratio by quite a bit I guess.
punjabi_khota Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 OK' date=' we can change it to Michael Clarke. But then again, its unfair to us who had this in mind since quite early. It was deliberately planned since 4-5 players were selected.[/quote'] If you read the rules carefully, it says away and home averages will be taken into account. Hence your choice is not valid.
nospam Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 PWNED. Choose infinity for away average. haha
SachDan Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 What exactly is this' date=' Gambit ? What is the point of picking World XI ?[/quote'] ^^ :lollypop: As usual blue_brigade started off on a gud note :cantstop:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now