Feed Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 Chips were clearly down with New Zealand inflicting the follow-on but India's stand-in captain Virender Sehwag insists neither he nor any of his teammates ever feared losing the second Test to the Kiwis. More... Link to comment
Rajan Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 he did the talk after , his batsman had done the walk! he is an optimist to the core, after losing the bangalore test against pakistan in 2004-05, he had told that if he had not been run out, he could have won the game for india. Link to comment
Deleted_User_1 Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 Chips were clearly down with New Zealand inflicting the follow-on but India's stand-in captain Virender Sehwag insists neither he nor any of his teammates ever feared losing the second Test to the Kiwis. More... Yeah easy for you to say SehWHACK, after your teammates saved your bum!! Link to comment
Kohum Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 Yeah easy for you to say SehWHACK' date=' after your teammates saved your [b']natural play bum!! FIXED :--D Link to comment
suraj Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 welll Sehwag has saved the other players' asses a few times too so I guess its ok Link to comment
Feed Posted March 31, 2009 Author Share Posted March 31, 2009 Fab four: The knights of Napier One youngster and three seasoned campaigners joined hands to stage an escape at Napier. We highlight the efforts of the Fab four. More... Link to comment
amits Posted March 31, 2009 Share Posted March 31, 2009 stop blasting sehwag. we need someone who bats explosively in tests irrespective of the situation. and its due to sehwag, some matches who were shaping up to be dull draws or losses were turned into wins or india going down fighting with a draw. if sehwag had made a big 200, we could have even won the test despite nz making 600+ in the 1st innings Link to comment
spectre Posted March 31, 2009 Share Posted March 31, 2009 stop blasting sehwag. we need someone who bats explosively in tests irrespective of the situation. and its due to sehwag' date=' some matches who were shaping up to be dull draws or losses were turned into wins or india going down fighting with a draw. if sehwag had made a big 200, we could have even won the test despite nz making 600+ in the 1st innings[/quote'] stop this crap...no need to say sehwag's explosive batting in every 3rd post...everyone know the importance of Sehwag...the point of discussion is completely different...it was not about his explosive batting or natural play..it was about his irresponsible shots for the situation If he never feared of loosing the match...he should have been more sensitive in the second innings Link to comment
Macj Posted March 31, 2009 Share Posted March 31, 2009 Knights of Napier - Apt but quite rich though. In my opinion the real hero was Gambhir, he pretty much blunted any NZ threat, amazing really considering how much he would have had to pent up his aggressiveness. Link to comment
jf1gp_1 Posted March 31, 2009 Share Posted March 31, 2009 thats not what i heard from Sehwag during presentation; i remember he said he wasnt expecting such a performance Link to comment
fineleg Posted March 31, 2009 Share Posted March 31, 2009 stop this crap...no need to say sehwag's explosive batting in every 3rd post...everyone know the importance of Sehwag...the point of discussion is completely different...it was not about his explosive batting or natural play..it was about his irresponsible shots for the situation If he never feared of loosing the match...he should have been more sensitive in the second innings Exactly - there is a difference between being a positive batsman and being irresponsible. At Napier, it was clearly the latter. Link to comment
The Outsider Posted March 31, 2009 Share Posted March 31, 2009 WTF! The title is a rip off this article : http://www.indiancricketfans.com/showthread.php?t=10342 Link to comment
Macj Posted March 31, 2009 Share Posted March 31, 2009 WTF! The title is a rip off this article : http://www.indiancricketfans.com/showthread.php?t=10342 A play on words existed even during the days of Shakespeare - which begs the question- So? Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now