Gambhir finally comes of age in the NZ tour

[Shane]

some godfather of rohit sharma in the bcci' date=' who helps in his selection everytime, gives the domestic bowlers huge sums of money to give lollypop bowling to rohit sharma to allow him to hit free runs in domestic cricket[/quote'] Stats :orderorder:

[amits]

i cant understand y most threads where i post eventually turn into rohit sharma v dhawan threads :s::dontknow:

[Shane]

i cant understand y most threads where i post eventually turn into rohit sharma v dhawan threads :s::dontknow:

Thats not the point here, i want stats for genuinity :hitler:

[bharat297]

You may as well give up guys ... amits knows he's been proven wrong, and so he was trying to be funny and just say random stuff. In the last post, he tried changing the subject. He's got nowhere to go now.

[amits]

there is no need to give up. and i havent been proven wrong at all

[fineleg]

there is no need to give up. and i havent been proven wrong at all

Sangwan > Dhawan Right or wrong? and Mishra > Bradman?

[bharat297]

there is no need to give up. and i havent been proven wrong at all

I believe you have, you just said that whatever you say we can guarantee that you can 100% of the time back it up with stats. You then claimed Sharma gets easier bowlers than Dhawan, despite the fact that they play in the same comp. In fact Sharma has played at higher levels than Dhawan (such as India A, and scored hundreds against top teams like Australia). Instead of backing it up with stats, you rambled on about godfathers and what not. Sorry, but whichever way you look at it, you were wrong here. It would be good if you could be a bit mature and admit that you were wrong here.

[amits]

even dhawan has played in india a level. he even hit 184 in aus in the emerging tournament last year and stats dont tell about strength of opposition and some other factors

[amits]

Sangwan > Dhawan Right or wrong? and Mishra > Bradman?

u r right in both cases if u compare their bowling. in batting, the comparision is rediculous for any cricketer to be better than bradman, they have to avg 50+ in tests. this makes players like tendulkar, sehwag, dravid, lara, kallis & even thilan samaraweera better than bradman

[flamy]

u r right in both cases if u compare their bowling. in batting, the comparision is rediculous for any cricketer to be better than bradman, they have to avg 50+ in tests. this makes players like tendulkar, sehwag, dravid, lara, kallis & even thilan samaraweera better than bradman

ok, sometimes my turnip is cooked so much that I have to state the obvious. :(( dumb@$$

[Mr. Wicket]

i cant understand y most threads where i post eventually turn into rohit sharma v dhawan threads :s::dontknow:

Most threads where you post eventually turn into stupidity v. common sense threads. And the people with common sense are getting tired of responding to your totally moronic dumbass comments.

[fineleg]

u r right in both cases if u compare their bowling. in batting, the comparision is rediculous for any cricketer to be better than bradman, they have to avg 50+ in tests. this makes players like tendulkar, sehwag, dravid, lara, kallis & even thilan samaraweera better than bradman

:yousuck:

[flamy]

Let me present a theory. The people causing the most havoc on these forum... is be direct correlate to them not getting any. Case in point: amits. There are other cases I'll let you do the analysis :sherlock:

[bharat297]

amits again you havent been able to prove that rohit sharma gets easier bowlers than shikhar dhawan ... lets face it ... you know you cant prove this ... and furthermore your credibility is rapidly deteriorating by making statements like samaraweera is better than bradman in tests.

[flamy]

amits again you havent been able to prove that rohit sharma gets easier bowlers than shikhar dhawan ... lets face it ... you know you cant prove this ... and furthermore your credibility is rapidly deteriorating by making statements like samaraweera is better than bradman in tests.

:hmmmm2: