Dhondy Posted July 14, 2009 Author Posted July 14, 2009 Ravi, I deserve a few ICF dollars for lifting the readership of the site. It's obvious that these rats were reading the thread in droves, fuming with fury at the home truths being rammed down their furry throats but didn't have the courage to come out and face the music. The moment their side has fluked a day of good cricket, they have emerged from the shadows and are swarming all over the place, trying to spread the plague that shrouds their own bills and burrows. Looks like this thread hit home in spectacular fashion.:hysterical:
patriot Posted July 14, 2009 Posted July 14, 2009 It's obvious that these rats were reading the thread in droves, fuming with fury at the home truths being rammed down their furry throats but didn't have the courage to come out and face the music. Thats delighfully brutal.:hysterical::hysterical:
DomainK Posted July 14, 2009 Posted July 14, 2009 Pakistan's recent innings does not undo the two back-to-back collapses. They remain.
Dhondy Posted July 14, 2009 Author Posted July 14, 2009 We'll continue to appreciate good cricket when it's played and be ruthless in slamming cowardly performances like the ones that have come to characterise that side in the recent years. Regular posters will know how scathing I can be when India underperform, but try and explain that to our furry, long tailed friends.
Gambit Posted July 14, 2009 Posted July 14, 2009 This thread is a clear case of PE. Never count your bros before the end of the match. :D
Mr. Wicket Posted July 14, 2009 Posted July 14, 2009 Or is it that Monga and co have got it right and we have the wrong end of the stick. You can never tell with Pakistan. Hardly. The fact that they've collapsed again today just shows that the days with their really good/outstanding performances are more an aberration or part of their usual cycle of inconsistencies, but hardly representative performances or indicative of a quality team. One day they play with a fire up their arses, the next they're back to being gutless wonders.
patriot Posted July 14, 2009 Posted July 14, 2009 Donkeys have lost 6 wickets for 31 runs.:hysterical: .:hysterical: .:hysterical:
patriot Posted July 14, 2009 Posted July 14, 2009 Have to say cornered donkeys, with their mercurial ways are the most entertaining cricket team in the world. :winky:
DomainK Posted July 14, 2009 Posted July 14, 2009 Have to say cornered donkeys, with their mercurial ways are the most entertaining cricket team in the world. :winky: Most entertaining.....I was never entertained like this before.
Tapioca Posted July 14, 2009 Posted July 14, 2009 CI writing is literally like paint by numbers stuff. Lazy, boring writing with the same handful of adjectives and verbs every piece. Writing about Pakistan? Watch the words enigmatic, mercurial, inconsistent, etc show up right away in the title. Pietersen? Everything is 'outrageous, explosive, dominant, thrilling', just as any knock from Tendulkar these days is calculating or crafty. Just be glad that Dileep Premachandran isn't around to tell us about every coruscating drive and coruscating cut of Sehwag's! :haha: I occasionally look up his blog but his current writing is not as TOEFL as it used to be
DomainK Posted July 14, 2009 Posted July 14, 2009 Nine wickets for 35 runs. I can not understand which one of the three is the worst.
King Posted July 14, 2009 Posted July 14, 2009 Oh my goodness me..... am I reading it right? Yet again, another collapse. From 1 for 284 to 320 bowled out.... god help their coaches. They must be scratching their head and wondering what they can do about this. Forget the famous "English collapse", Pakistan now has patented it. How can a team collapse this badly 3 times in a row? Barring couple of batsmen the rest of the scores sound like a phone number. Perhaps you can put it like one of the Sri Lankan mate said, "Sri Lankans usually are good under pressure, Pakistan is pants under pressure". They need psychological help to get a bit tougher mentally like Ijaz Ahmed said. They can't play under pressure.
DomainK Posted July 14, 2009 Posted July 14, 2009 Oh my goodness me..... am I reading it right? Yet again, another collapse. From 1 for 284 to 320 bowled out.... god help their coaches. They must be scratching their head and wondering what they can do about this. Forget the famous "English collapse", Pakistan now has patented it. How can a team collapse this badly 3 times in a row? Barring couple of batsmen the rest of the scores sound like a phone number. Perhaps you can put it like one of the Sri Lankan mate said, "Sri Lankans usually are good under pressure, Pakistan is pants under pressure". They need psychological help to get a bit tougher mentally like Ijaz Ahmed said. They can't play under pressure. But where was the pressure when the collapse started? They were in full control. It was Lanka who was under pressure. It all started with that foolish shot from YK and they created their own pressure out of nothing.
King Posted July 14, 2009 Posted July 14, 2009 But where was the pressure when the collapse started? They were in full control. It was Lanka who was under pressure. It all started with that foolish shot from YK and they created their own pressure out of nothing. Another 100 runs they could have closed the game. Just when they started to look fine they squandered the opportunity. How can you explain 21 runs from 8 batsmen? That's an average of under 3 per batsman :omg:
saneindian Posted July 14, 2009 Posted July 14, 2009 World no 1 and 2 and such hillarious collapse. Will they blame it on BCCI or will it be RAW? Welcome to test cricket world champs.
Desi Cartman Posted July 14, 2009 Posted July 14, 2009 3 collapses in 3 innings :yikes: They are just trying to support ICC by finishing test matches in less than 4 days :hitler:
King Posted July 14, 2009 Posted July 14, 2009 They are just trying to support ICC by finishing test matches in less than 4 days :hitler: Meanwhile 5 days of cricket in the Ashes produced a spectacular finish and ended in a draw... go figure.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now