youngindia Posted August 7, 2009 Posted August 7, 2009 Do you want me to pull up the stats of the test matches where SRT has played Aus with his nemesis Mcgrath ? Both his last 2 series..in Aus..he dint get to face his ultimate nemesis, as was in the recent series in India. The last time Mcgrath did play even in India..he owned SRT big time. : mcgrath was no nemesis.its a figment of your imagination. last time they played a test series. sachinwas underdone due to injury and din't play the first two matches. you are another clueless fanl who thinks too much of your second rate tastes. there is no element of genius in the game of ponting. he merely does many thigns well.but a master btasman he ain't. so keep your false gods to yourself. its always annoys me when people don't have first rate tastes but have the gall to open their mouth. as for stats. you are clueless to udnerstand that batsman's career consists of peaks and troughs,. watch the troughs bring down his average in the coming years. then you will be left without the stats argument as well.
Mr. Wicket Posted August 7, 2009 Posted August 7, 2009 you are another clueless fanl who thinks too much of your second rate tastes. there is no element of genius in the game of ponting. he merely does many thigns well.but a master btasman he ain't. so keep your false gods to yourself. its always annoys me when people don't have first rate tastes but have the gall to open their mouth. And how do you judge the difference between first rate and second rate tastes?
youngindia Posted August 7, 2009 Posted August 7, 2009 first rate taste means you discern and admire a masterpiece of a genius first and foremost. you can clearly distiniguish between geniuses, great,very good and good. that means as a tennis lover,you admire the creative shotmaking of federer. if you think roddick is a genius, there is a clearly a problem with your taste. :)
kabira Posted August 7, 2009 Posted August 7, 2009 what is ponting is average in India? In western world, India is supposed to produce batting belters, India is no good for bowlers and look our genious average there. Case Close No for discussion.
Sachinism Posted August 7, 2009 Posted August 7, 2009 How many people would pay to watch Ponting? Not many How many people would pay to watch Sachin? You could exclude all of India and you'd still get millions People recognize greatness. Sachin has that x-factor which makes him so great. Ponting has had the advantage of coming in after Langer, Slater, Taylor, Hayden have killed the spirit of the bowlers. Tendulkar for many years carried the whole team on his own. Our openers would get out cheaply and put a bounce in the step of the bowlers and he'd have to come in to face that. Lets look at how often Tendulkar has been screwed over by crappy umpires and how often Ponting is given a chance early on in his innings, yeh it is not their fault but it makes a massive difference when you start looking at stats and look past what actually happened when they were in the middle
EnterTheVoid Posted August 7, 2009 Posted August 7, 2009 How many people would pay to watch Ponting? Not many Sorry, Come again.
Sachinism Posted August 7, 2009 Posted August 7, 2009 Sorry' date=' Come again.[/quote'] I should have said outside Australia. I don't think that many, I know MANY cricket fans and they wouldn't miss an appointment to watch Ponting bat. Forget that, they wouldn't go watch him bat if they had nothing to do and a free ticket edit: Watch the reception he is getting in the ashes
Bradman99 Posted August 7, 2009 Posted August 7, 2009 Ponting should rightly go down as one of the greats, you can't downplay his achievements, he is a beautiful player to watch when his at his best. For me, no matter what the statistics say he is still not in the Tendulkar/Lara mould but he is not as far off Tendulkar as some Indians would tend to think.
zubinpepsi Posted August 7, 2009 Posted August 7, 2009 pr.ick on his way to a century at leeds... :((
DomainK Posted August 7, 2009 Posted August 7, 2009 pr.ick on his way to a century at leeds... :(( Yup. Only 61 short of his century. And looks like the English bowlers will serve those 61 runs on a platter.
EnterTheVoid Posted August 7, 2009 Posted August 7, 2009 I really like Ponting. I hope he gets his century. For a player of his calibre and worth, don't undermine his achievements with the tired old, second rate excuses.
EnterTheVoid Posted August 7, 2009 Posted August 7, 2009 I should have said outside Australia. I don't think that many' date=' I know MANY cricket fans and they wouldn't miss an appointment to watch Ponting bat. Forget that, they wouldn't go watch him bat if they had nothing to do and a free ticket [/quote'] Sorry. Really ? Captained his side to two sucessive world cup wins, is an excellent fielder and slips catcher, a very accomplished batsman and ambassador to numerous charities and fund raisers to help under priveleged children. Why would people deprive themselves the opportunity to see him ? I honestly don't give a shyt about his sledging, poor sportsmanship and all that. Too much is made of that nonsense, storm in a tea cup, you could say. As far as personal preference goes, I really enjoy watching him bat.
Sachinism Posted August 7, 2009 Posted August 7, 2009 Sorry. Really ? Captained his side to two sucessive world cup wins, is an excellent fielder and slips catcher, a very accomplished batsman and ambassador to numerous charities and fund raisers to help under priveleged children. Why would people deprive themselves the opportunity to see him ? I honestly don't give a shyt about his sledging, poor sportsmanship and all that. Too much is made of that nonsense, storm in a tea cup, you could say. As far as personal preference goes, I really enjoy watching him bat. They're not depriving themselves of anything, there is nothing they want to see
EnterTheVoid Posted August 7, 2009 Posted August 7, 2009 A difference of opinion. Agree to disagree than.
Sachinism Posted August 7, 2009 Posted August 7, 2009 A difference of opinion. Agree to disagree than. Exactly. :nice:
riya Posted August 7, 2009 Posted August 7, 2009 I should have said outside Australia. I don't think that many, I know MANY cricket fans and they wouldn't miss an appointment to watch Ponting bat. Forget that, they wouldn't go watch him bat if they had nothing to do and a free ticket edit: Watch the reception he is getting in the ashes He is an absolutely aggressive beautiful player to watch.What u r talking about?Man in full form is an absolute treat,don't get confused with his crap personality.There are many who love to watch Ponting in full form.He won'ty bat like a snail,he will go after the bowlers.Very entertaining batsman indeed.
riya Posted August 7, 2009 Posted August 7, 2009 I really like Ponting. I hope he gets his century. For a player of his calibre and worth, don't undermine his achievements with the tired old, second rate excuses. Also we sound like sour grapes too.Infact some of us have that insecurity while Ponting closing down to Sachin's record,am i right ?
EnterTheVoid Posted August 7, 2009 Posted August 7, 2009 Also we sound like sour grapes too.Infact some of us have that insecurity while Ponting closing down to Sachin's record' date='am i right ?[/quote'] If Ponting at some stage, equals or better's Sachin's record, his achievements would've been based on years and years of toil and hard work. If he works hard enough, and does achieve it, who is to say whether he deserved it or not ? Take the 2003 WC final for example. As painful as it is to watch, the sheer brilliance of that 140 odd cannot be downplayed. Is it not possible to be a fan of Sachin and a fan of Ponting ? If I admire Sachin, than do I have to hate Ponting and constantly downplay his achievements ?
riya Posted August 7, 2009 Posted August 7, 2009 If Ponting at some stage, equals or better's Sachin's record, his achievements would've been based on years and years of toil and hard work. If he works hard enough, and does achieve it, who is to say whether he deserved it or not ? Take the 2003 WC final for example. As painful as it is to watch, the sheer brilliance of that 140 odd cannot be downplayed. Is it not possible to be a fan of Sachin and a fan of Ponting ? If I admire Sachin, than do I have to hate Ponting and constantly downplay his achievements ? yeah,but according to some pundits here that was a ''second rate'' innings:giggle: And u will be accused as a tasteless fan too.:--D Constantly down playing Ponting means they are insecure and jealous.Sachin's place in history is intact and no one can replace him ever.
zubinpepsi Posted August 7, 2009 Posted August 7, 2009 pr.ick on his way to a century at leeds... :(( :eyedance:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now