Sir john Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 ^ are you disagreeing with the facts presented :dontknow: :two_thumbs_up::two_thumbs_up:
imran666 Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 alll i can say about this thread is :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: its like compairing mohammed hafeez with sachin tendulker
Mr. Wicket Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 I think that's a bit harsh. Akram may not have been as tailunted as Agarkar was, but paralleling him with Hafeez is uncalled for.
Guest sachin200 Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 Agarkar was good wicket taking bowler but compairing with wasim akram :giggle:
Zap_Brannigan Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 Do all the noobies only read the thread title?
imran666 Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 Agarkar was good wicket taking bowler but compairing with wasim akram :giggle: i agree ..agarkar was a good bowler but unfortunally he is very underrated ..evan by indians ..if u look at indias matches of 1990s he was amazing swinging the ball both ways evan reverse swing with the old ball at good pace...but he was nowere near akram i agree
Roshanrocks Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 i agree ..agarkar was a good bowler but unfortunally he is very underrated ..evan by indians ..if u look at indias matches of 1990s he was amazing swinging the ball both ways evan reverse swing with the old ball at good pace...but he was nowere near akram i agree The Original poster meant the title to be a joke...so he used the word "tailunted" and not "talented". Its basically to show how statistics can be mis-interpreted or rather bent to come to any conclusion. get it? :dontknow:
Hur Rizvi Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 Well this thread is a joke By using this logic Rana NAved will be better than wasim akram and even mohammad sami will be at par wid wasim ....In order to compare talent and quality compare the test stats of both wasim and Agarkar......... And if you are comparing odi stats economy also gets some weithage .... Agarkar's Econ was above 5 and wasim's economy was under 4 tells u about quality of the man
EnterTheVoid Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 Well this thread is a joke By using this logic Rana NAved will be better than wasim akram and even mohammad sami will be at par wid wasim ....In order to compare talent and quality compare the test stats of both wasim and Agarkar......... And if you are comparing odi stats economy also gets some weithage .... Agarkar's Econ was above 5 and wasim's economy was under 4 tells u about quality of the man Abe n00b, its a joke thread. Not meant to be taken seriously :headshake:
Gunner_Mania Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 It's a joke' date='but a stupid one.[/quote'] Abey dhakkan why are you going around bumping old threads?
Shawn Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 Abey dhakkan why are you going around bumping old threads? I'm new here.I found this on "Introduction thread for new members"
Guest Gunner Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 I think that's a bit harsh. Akram may not have been as tailunted as Agarkar was' date=' but paralleling him with Hafeez is uncalled for.[/quote'] Gem!!!! Subah'nallah...:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Cricket_Guru Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 Agrakar might be more tailunted than akram, but he never delivered to expectations, where as wasim akram did, and did it consistently throughout his career. tell me who would you people like to have in indian team sir agarkar or akram? the answer is quiet obvious:eyedance:, so why insult akram then, because he's a pakistani:pray:
Clarke Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 tell me who would you people like to have in indian team sir agarkar or akram? the answer is quiet obvious:eyedance:' date=' so why insult akram then, because he's a pakistani:pray:[/quote'] u never heard of Sir Aggy :ohmy:
Cricket_Guru Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 u never heard of Sir Aggy :ohmy: what made you say this?
Gunner_Mania Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 Agrakar might be more tailunted than akram, but he never delivered to expectations, where as wasim akram did, and did it consistently throughout his career. tell me who would you people like to have in indian team sir agarkar or akram? the answer is quiet obvious:eyedance:, so why insult akram then, because he's a pakistani:pray: Wasim Akram? Did you know gay gay aar picked Sir Aggy before Wasim?
Cricket_Guru Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 ^^ lol no i didnt, i put my hand up and admit in loosing this battle. :--D
mastana Posted June 30, 2010 Posted June 30, 2010 Agrakar might be more tailunted than akram, but he never delivered to expectations, where as wasim akram did, and did it consistently throughout his career. tell me who would you people like to have in indian team sir agarkar or akram? the answer is quiet obvious:eyedance:, so why insult akram then, because he's a pakistani Why would we like to have Akram(Pakistani) in our Indian team? Agarkar is indian only he can play for India. :dontknow:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now