Murali vs. Tendulkar

[Jersey #10]

Actually your beloved ICC ratings and Wisden do too. Ponting and Murali both top 900 performance points , whereas their other beloved contemporary has never touched 900, ever.

Murali was only ranked in test matches by ICC compared to sachin who has been ranked in both formats...allrounded player sachin may be? ...

[Guest Hiten.]

Actually your beloved ICC ratings and Wisden do too. Ponting and Murali both top 900 performance points , whereas their other beloved contemporary has never touched 900, ever.

Forget everything and just my query over why exactly do you consider Murali "greater (as a bowler) over SRT (as a batsman)" when he averages miserably against the BEST team in the world he faced in their own backyard ? Shouldn't that thump all the facts and ratings ? I mean if *your* best cannot perform against the best what is all the facade about his greatness ? :hmmmm: You consider SRT as lesser cricketer due to his *poor* show in the finals, so how can you consider Murali as a great one when he is treated as a street bowler in Australia ?

[jusarrived]

Murali is a javelin thrower , please dont compare him to Warne or tendulkar

[The Outsider]

Actually your beloved ICC ratings and Wisden do too. Ponting and Murali both top 900 performance points , whereas their other beloved contemporary has never touched 900, ever.

Do you even understand what those ratings and numbers mean? The last time we spoke you were not even able to define "hardly any" for me? Did you get Afridi's remnant brain cells transplanted in the mean time? :hysterical:

[patriot]

Do you even understand what those ratings and numbers mean? The last time we spoke you were not even able to define "hardly any" for me? Did you get Afridi's remnant brain cells transplanted in the mean time? :hysterical:

Baaharwali chipkali, Better than you - challenge ho jaye. :yay:

[The Outsider]

Baaharwali chipkali, Better than you - challenge ho jaye. :yay:

Chalo, deshbhakt. Let's start with your definition of "hardly any".

[patriot]

Chalo' date=' deshbhakt. Let's start with your definition of "hardly any".[/quote'] Baaharwale - you have been going on an on about this like a toota hua recorder. Can you tell me what you are refering too ?

[veer]

transparent brain, Learn to read properly. As a bowler - Murali owns more records than SRT as batsman . OK ?

yeahh.. chakrams do like chucker these days..

[The Outsider]

Baaharwale - you have been going on an on about this like a toota hua recorder. Can you tell me what you are refering too ?

This post of yours :

You are showing yourself to be rather dumb - the fact that for all those records in the last 10 years ( since 1999) he has hardly been in the top 5 of the ICC ODI ratings tells its own story. Oh...those guys who wrote the ranking algorithm must be rather dumb isn't it or intellectually dishonest themselves.:hysterical:

From the "We are losing the finals to Lanka..for sure.". Can you put a percentage on what you mean by when you say "he has hardly been"?

[patriot]

You are showing yourself to be rather dumb - the fact that for all those records in the last 10 years ( since 1999) he has hardly been in the top 5 of the ICC ODI ratings tells its own story. Oh...those guys who wrote the ranking algorithm must be rather dumb isn't it or intellectually dishonest themselves

Baaharwale, I stick to what I said: 1999-2009 Top 5 is what I said iiint ??? http://www.iccreliancerankings.com/playerdisplay/odi/batting/?id=1905&graph=ranking Except for a cumulativce period of about 3 years mostly between March 01 -March 03 - the graph dips below 1/10 of the scale of 50 ( out of top 5). I mean that should be "hardly" for someone whos fans claim him to be " God" and what not.

[The Outsider]

Baaharwale, I stick to what I said: 1999-2009 Top 5 is what I said iiint ??? http://www.iccreliancerankings.com/playerdisplay/odi/batting/?id=1905&graph=ranking Except for a cumulativce period of about 3 years mostly between March 01 -March 03 - the graph dips below 1/10 of the scale of 50 ( out of top 5). I mean that should be "hardly" for someone whos fans claim him to be " God" and what not.

Don't go into sophistry - let's be very clear. What percentage do you usually have in mind when you say "hardly has been"? And don't worry, I will also prove your sophistry wrong, but all in due course.

[patriot]

Don't go into sophistry - let's be very clear. What percentage do you usually have in mind when you say "hardly has been"? And don't worry, I will also prove your sophistry wrong, but all in due course.

Wah re wah...aap toh antaryaami hone ke sanket dete hain, baba. :boffing::saint:

[patriot]

BTW' date=' loved the OP goose. Hopefully, I will split it up into a meaningful discussion and the trolling at some point.[/quote'] I see. Anything that challenges the unabated , nauseating worship of a single player is " trolling". Worshipping Tendu may be the only thing that someone does here - but so long as he does that its fine. Ok. Ab samjha.

[The Outsider]

Wah re wah...aap toh antaryaami hone ke sanket dete hain, baba. :boffing::saint:

Chalo, we are done here again. No quantitative numbers to support random words! :hysterical:

[The Outsider]

I see. Anything that challenges the unabated ' date=' nauseating worship of a single player is " trolling". Worshipping Tendu may be the only thing that someone does here - but so long as he does that its fine. Ok. Ab samjha.[/quote'] Let's make a start - I've asked you on around 10 occasions what "hardly has been" means when you use that term. Define it in a quantitative manner and we can move ahead - till then you are precisely a troll who spouts garbage or an idiot who does not know what he means when he types something.

[patriot]

Chalo' date=' we are done here again. No [u']quantitative numbers to support random words! :hysterical:

Baahwarle baba, - Could you enlighten me on what could non-quantitative numbers mean in that case ? Or was the above a display of your typical random use of words to create rhetotic ? :gamer1: :giggle:

[patriot]

Let's make a start - I've asked you on around 10 occasions what "hardly has been" means when you use that term. Define it in a quantitative manner and we can move ahead - till then you are precisely a troll who spouts garbage or an idiot who does not know what he means when he types something.

Ok jee. In all honesty I hadn't seen Tendulkar in the top 5 ICC ODI ratings for long long time - and it was my long short bet - which hasn't exactly paid low dividends. OK ?

[The Outsider]

Ok jee. In all honesty I hadn't seen Tendulkar in the top 5 ICC ODI ratings for long long time - and it was my long short bet - which hasn't exactly paid low dividends. OK ?

Bottom line - you were spouting garbage without checking facts?

[patriot]

Bottom line - you were spouting garbage without checking facts?

Still wan't way off the mark. Not as way of the mark as your " non- quantitative numbers ". LOL . You must be spouting some really cheap tharra , when you let out that pearl.

[The Outsider]

Baahwarle baba, - Could you enlighten me on what could non-quantitative numbers mean in that case ? Or was the above a display of your typical random use of words to create rhetotic ? :gamer1: :giggle:

Deshbhakti to seekhi ki nahin pata nahin gandit seekh lo - Numbers having non quantitative properties is a mainstream area of research for example infinity and indeterminate numbers have non quantitative properties. People who know more Math than I do will verify, I am sure.